Metal Science and Heat Treatment

, Volume 50, Issue 3–4, pp 164–170 | Cite as

Effect of magnetic field on martensitic transformation in iron-nickel alloys with different size of austenite grains

  • Yu. V. Kaletina
  • V. M. Schastlivtsev
  • E. A. Fokina


The effect of the size of austenite grains on the temperature of the beginning of martensitic transformation during cooling, on the amount of the α-phase, and on the value of the critical field that causes the appearance of the first portions of martensite is studied for the case of treatment of iron-nickel alloys in a magnetic field.


Magnetic Field Austenite Martensite Nickel Alloy Test Piece 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. B. Pickering, Physical Metallurgy and Design of Steels [Russian translation], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1982).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. G. Korshunov, A. M. Polyakova, N. L. Chernenko, and V. M. Umoeva, “Effect of grain size and tempering temperature on the wear resistance of steel 38KhN3MA,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 61(5), 1007–1012 (1986).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. G. Gaidukov and V. D. Sadovskii, “About the problem of the effect of the grain size of austenite on martensitic transformation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 96(1), 67–68 (1954).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Umemoto and W. S. Owen, “Effects of austenitizing temperatures and austenite grain size on the formation of athermal martensite in an iron-nickel and an iron-nickel-carbon alloy,” Metall. Trans., 5(9), 2041–2046 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. P. Maksimova and V. V. Nemirovskii, “About nucleation of martensite in iron-nickel alloys possessing burst-like transformation kinetics,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 177(1), 81–84 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. V. Voznesenskii, A. A. Dobrikov, V. I. Izotov, and A. P. Kozlov, “Effect of the size of initial austenite grains on the structure and the yield strength of steel hardened for martensite,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 40, 92–101 (1975).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. P. Maksimova and V. N. Zambrzhitskii, “About the effect of the grain size of martensite on martensitic transformation and mechanical properties of metastable austenitic alloys,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 62(5), 974–984 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. N. Blinova, A. M. Glezer, M. N. Pankova, and E. L. Krotkina, “Special features of martensitic transformation in Fe-Ni alloys hardened from liquid state,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 87(4), 49–54 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. N. Blinova, A. M. Glezer, N. B. D'yakonova, and V. A. Zhorin, “Size effect in martensitic transformation in iron-nickel alloys hardened from melt,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz., 65(10), 1444–1449 (2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. M. Glezer, E. N. Blinova, and V. A. Pozdnyakov, “Martensitic transformation in single-crystal iron-nickel alloys,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz., 66(9), 1263–1275 (2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. A. Krivoglaz, V. D. Sadovskii, L. V. Smirnov, and E. A. Fokina, Hardening of Steel in Magnetic Field [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. A. Fokina, L. V. Smirnov, V. N. Olesov, et al., “Special features of the morphology of martensite formed under the action of magnetic field,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 51(1), 160–165 (1981).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. M. Schastlivtsev, V. N. Olesov, L. V. Smirnov, et al., “Effect of magnetic field on the morphology of martensite and mechanical properties of steel 50N26,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., No. 11, 166–174 (1990).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Maki, S. Shimooka, M. Umemoto, and J. Tamura, “The morphology of strain-induced and thermally transformed martensite in Fe-Ni-C alloys,” J. Jpn. Inst. Met., 35(11), 1073–1082 (1971).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Maki, S. Shimooka, et al., “The morphology of thin plate-like martensite in Fe-Ni-C alloys,” J. Jpn. Inst. Met., 14, 62–67 (1973).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. Ya. Georgieva and O. P. Maksimova, “About interrelation between the kinetics and the structure in martensitic transformations,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 32, 364–376 (1971).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. L. Roitburd, “A theory of formation of a heterophase structure,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 113(1), 69–104 (1974).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. V. Kaletina
    • 1
  • V. M. Schastlivtsev
    • 1
  • E. A. Fokina
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Metals Physics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesEkaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations