Advertisement

Earth, Moon, and Planets

, Volume 106, Issue 2–4, pp 133–157 | Cite as

Revolution in Field Science: Apollo Approach to Inaccessible Surface Exploration

  • P. E. Clark
Article

Abstract

The extraordinary challenge mission designers, scientists, and engineers, faced in planning the first human expeditions to the surface of another solar system body led to the development of a distinctive and even revolutionary approach to field work. Not only were those involved required to deal effectively with the extreme limitation in resources available for and access to a target as remote as the lunar surface; they were required to developed a rigorous approach to science activities ranging from geological field work to deploying field instruments. Principal aspects and keys to the success of the field work are discussed here, including the highly integrated, intensive, and lengthy science planning, simulation, and astronaut training; the development of a systematic scheme for description and documentation of geological sites and samples; and a flexible yet disciplined methodology for site documentation and sample collection. The capability for constant communication with a ‘backroom’ of geological experts who make requests and weigh in on surface operations was innovative and very useful in encouraging rapid dissemination of information to the greater community in general. An extensive archive of the Apollo era science activity related documents provides evidence of the principal aspects and keys to the success of the field work. The Apollo Surface Journal allows analysis of the astronaut’s performance in terms of capability for traveling on foot, documentation and sampling of field stations, and manual operation of tools and instruments, all as a function of time. The application of these analysis as ‘lessons learned’ for planning the next generation of human or robotic field science activities on the Moon and elsewhere are considered here as well.

Keywords

Lunar and planetary exploration Apollo program Lunar science Surface science Field science Field geology Robotic precursors Science planning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to especially recognize Eugene Shoemaker, for establishing the basis for the Apollo Field Methodology and encouraging the author during his lifetime. The author would like to thank Paul Lowman, Don Beatty, Gerry Schaber, and David Portree for their contributions to this work, through their efforts in formal and informal archiving and sharing of Apollo era material, keeping the stories alive, and ‘passing the torch’.

References

  1. P. Ables, Time and motions required to perform an active seismic experiment proposed for the first Apollo landing. USGS Technical Letter. Astrogeol. 12 (1967)Google Scholar
  2. J. Allen, Summary of scientific results, Apollo 15 preliminary science report, NASA SP–289, 2-1-2-11, (1972) http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/a15psr.html
  3. J. Allton, Catalog of apollo lunar surface geological sampling tools and containers, JSC-23454/LESC-26676, (1989) http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar_resources/documents/LunarSampleToolCatalog.pdf
  4. Apollo 15 Field Geology Investigation Team, Apollo 15 Lunar Samples–Preliminary Description. Sci. 175(4020), 363–375 (1972)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Apollo 16 Field Geology Investigation Team, Apollo 16 Exploration of Descartes–Geologic Summary. Sci. 179(4068), 62–69 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Apollo 17 Field Geology Investigation Team, Geologic Exploration of Taurus–Littrow–Apollo 17 Landing Site. Sci. 182(4113), 672–680 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Apollo 15 Preliminary Examination Team, Geologic Setting of Apollo 15 Samples. Sci. 175(4020), 407–415 (1972)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Apollo 16 Preliminary Examination Team, Apollo 16 Lunar Samples–Petrographic and Chemical Description. Sci. 179(4068), 23–24 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Apollo 17 Preliminary Examination Team, Apollo 17 Samples–Chemical and Petrographic Description. Sci. 182(4113), 659–672 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Bailey, G. Ulrich, K. Edmonds (1967) Apollo applications program field test 8 with section on task analysis. USGS Technical Lett. 26, (1967)Google Scholar
  11. A. Basu, D. McKay, R. Fruland, Origin and modal petrography of Luna 24 soils, in Mare crisium: the view from luna 24, ed. by R. Merrill, J. Papike (Pergamon, New York, 1978), pp. 321–337Google Scholar
  12. D. Beatty, Taking science to the moon (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2001)Google Scholar
  13. P. Benjamin, Revision of Operational Constraints for J Mission Traverse Planning, Case 320, Bellcom 2032-PB-mp, (1970)Google Scholar
  14. D.L. Bish, S.A. Howard, Quantitative phase analysis using the Rietveld Method. J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 86–91 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Blake, Remote X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence analysis on planetary surfaces. Adv. X-ray Anal. 43, 487–496 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. D. Blake, P. Sarrazin, D. Bish, S. Chiprera, D. Vaniman, CheMin: A Definitive Mineralogy Instrument in the Analytical Laboratory of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL ‘09), Lun Plan Sci XXXVI, 1608.pdf, (2005)Google Scholar
  17. D. Bland, R. Blevins, J. Olmsted, R. Koppa, Final Lunar Surface Procedures vol 1 and 2. (1972)Google Scholar
  18. D. Byers, Destination Moon: A History of the Lunar Orbiter Program, NASA TM X-3487, (1977) http://history.nasa.gov/TM-3487/top.htm
  19. P.E. Clark, A. Basu, B.R. Hawke, The relationship between orbital, ground-based and sample data for lunar landing sites. Proc Lun Plan Sci Conf 20th, 147–160, (1990)Google Scholar
  20. P.E. Clark, S.A. Curtis, M.L. Rilee, W. Truszkowski, G. Marr, C.Y. Cheung, M. Rudisill, BEES for ANTS: Space Mission Applications for the Autonomous NanoTechnology Swarm, AIAA Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, Session 29-IS-13: ANTS, (2004)Google Scholar
  21. P.E. Clark, S.A. Curtis, M.L. Rilee, C.Y. Cheung, R. Wesenberg, J. Dorband, G. Brown, The next generation of tetrahedral rovers, in Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF-07), ed. by M.S. El-Genk, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 880 (2007), pp 711–718Google Scholar
  22. P.E. Clark, K. Gendreau, Z. Arzoumanian, A portable tool for in situ sample screening and site characterization on the Moon, 1st NLSI Lunar Science Conference, 2101.pdf (2008)Google Scholar
  23. P.E. Clark, J. Bleacher, S. Mest, N. Petro, L. Leshin, Lunar field exploration scenarios for a south pole outpost. LPS XL, 1135.pdf (2009a)Google Scholar
  24. P.E. Clark, C.R. Weisbin, K. Shelton, J.H. Smith, J. Mozinski, W. Lincoln, A. Elfes, H. Hua, V. Adumitroaie, R. Silberg, Lunar surface mission productivities as a function of mission duration and weighted science objectives, AIAA Space 2009 Proceedings Online, AIAA-2009-6632-216, (2009b)Google Scholar
  25. P.E. Clark, J. Bleacher, S. Mest, N. Petro, Comparison of Geological Field Work for Similar Investigations at Different Landing Sites and for Different Architectures at the Same Landing Sites. Lunar and Planetary Science XLI, 1261.pdf (2010a)Google Scholar
  26. P.E. Clark, S.A. Curtis, F. Minetto, J. Marshall, J. Nuth, C. Calle, SPARCLE: Electrostatic Dust Control Tool Proof of Concept, SPESIF-10, ed. by G. Patterson, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1208 (2010b), pp. 549–556Google Scholar
  27. P.E. Clark, P.S. Millar, B. Beaman, P.S. Yeh, L. Cooper, S. Feng, E. Young, Ultra Low Temperature Ultra Low Power Instrument Packages for Planetary Surfaces, SPESIF-10, ed. by G. Patterson, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1208 (2010c), pp 541–548Google Scholar
  28. A. England, Summary of scientific results, apollo 16 preliminary science report, NASA SP–315, 3-1-3-8, (1972) http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/a16psr.html
  29. A. Hammond, Lunar science: analyzing the apollo legacy. Science 179(4080), 1313–1315 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. N. Hinners Apollo 16 Site Selection, Apollo 16 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP–315, 1-1–1-3 (1972), http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/a16psr.html
  31. N. Hinners Apollo 17 Site Selection, Apollo 17 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP–330, 1-1–1-5 (1973), http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17psr.html
  32. Hall lunar impact: a history of project ranger, NASA SP-4210 (1977), http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4210/pages/Info.htm
  33. O. James, Petrologic and age relations in Apollo 16 rocks: Implications for subsurface geology and the age of the Nectaris basin. Proc. Lun. Plan. Sci. 12B, 209–233 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. R. Kain, R. Koppa, J. Olmsted, T. Montgomery, Preliminary Apollo 16 Preliminary Lunar Surface Procedures, NASA TMX70010, (1971)Google Scholar
  35. E.H. Kloman, Unmanned Space Project Management Surveyor and Lunar Orbiter, SP-4901, (1997)http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4901/sp-4901.htm
  36. J. Martin, J. Marshall, L. Mason, D. Scheld, In situ geologic analyzer for lunar and martian surfaces, (2008) http://www.nscicorp.com/public/InSitu Geologic Analyzer for Lunar and Martian Surfaces.pdf
  37. D. McKay, G. Heiken, A. Basu, G. Blanford, S. Simon, R. Reedy, B. French, J. Papike, The lunar regolith. In: G. Heiken, D. Vaniman, B. French, (eds) The Lunar Sourcebook (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991) pp 285–356Google Scholar
  38. J. M’Gonigle, D. Schleicher, I. Lucchitta (1969) A proposed scheme for lunar geologic description. USGS Interagency report: Astrogeology 18, (1969)Google Scholar
  39. J. Mitchell, D. Carrier, N. Costes, W. Houston, R. Scott, H. Hovland, Soil Mechanics. Apollo 17 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP–330, 8-1-8-22 (1973), http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17psr.html
  40. W. Muehlberger, R. Batson, E. Boudette, C. Duke, R. Eggleton, D. Elston, A.England, V. Freeman, M. Hait, T. Hall, J. Head, C. Hodges, H. Holt, E. Jackson, J. Jordan, K. Larson, D. Milton, V. Reed, J. Rennilson, G. Schaber, J. Schafer, L. Silver, D. Stuart–Alexander, R. Sutton, G. Swann, R. Tyner, G. Ulrich, H. Wilshire, E. Wolfe, J. Young, Preliminary geologic investigation of the Apollo 16 landing site, Apollo 16 Preliminary Science report, NASA SP-315, 6-1-6-81 (1972), http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/a16psr.html
  41. W. Muehlberger, R. Batson, E. Cernan, V. Freeman, M. Hait, H. Holt, K Howard, E. Jackson, K. Larson, V. Reed, J. Rennilson, H. Schmitt, D. Scott, R. Sutton, D. Stuart–Alexander, G. Swann, N. Trask, Ulrich, H. Wilshire, E. Wolfe, Preliminary geologic investigation of the Apollo 17 landing site, Apollo 17 Preliminary Science report, NASA SP–330, 6-1-6-91 (1973), http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17psr.html
  42. NASA Manned Spaceflight Office, Apollo 15 Mission Operation Report, NASA M–933–71–15, (1971)Google Scholar
  43. NASA/MSC Lunar Missions Office, J–1 Mission Science Requirements, MSC-02536, (1970)Google Scholar
  44. NASA/MSC Science Mission Support Division, J–2 Mission Science Planning Document. MSC-04143 (1972a)Google Scholar
  45. NASA/MSC Science Mission Support Division, J–3 Mission Science Planning Document. MSC–05871 (1972b)Google Scholar
  46. C. Neal, LEAG Science Roadmap (2009), http://www.lpi.usra.edu/leag
  47. R. Parker, Summary of scientific results, apollo 17 preliminary science report, NASA SP–330, 3-1-3-7 (1973) http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17psr.html
  48. R. Regan, Preliminary geophysical report o selected geologic test sites. USGS Technical Letter, Astrogeol 29, (1967)Google Scholar
  49. G. Schaber Chronology of activities from conception through the end of project apollo 1960–1973. USGS Astrogeology Branch, Open File Report 2005–1190, (2005) http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1190/
  50. H. Schmitt, Apollo 17 report on the valley of Taurus–Littrow. Science 182, 681–690 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  51. H. Schmitt, G. Cernan, A geological investigation of the Taurus–Littrow Valley, Apollo 17 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP–330, 5-1–5-21 (1973), http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17psr.html
  52. P. Spudis, Apollo 16 site geology and impact melts: Implications for the geologic history of the lunar highlands. Proc Lun Plan Sci Conf 15th, JGR, 91, C95–C107, (1984)Google Scholar
  53. P. Spudis, C. Pieters, Global and regional data about the moon, in The lunar sourcebook, ed. by G. Heiken, D. Vaniman, B. French (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991), pp. 595–632Google Scholar
  54. P. Spudis, G. Ryder, Geology and petrology of the Apollo 15 landing site: Past, present, and future understanding. Eos. Trans. AGU, 66, 721–726 (1985)Google Scholar
  55. D. Stoffler, A. Bischoff, R. Borchardt, A. Burghele, A. Deutsch, E. Jessberger, R. Ostertag, H. Palme, B. Spettel, W. Reimold, K. Wacker, H. Wanke, Composition and evolution of the lunar crust I the Descartes Highlands, Apollo 16. Proc Lun Plan Sci Conf 15th, JGR, 89, C449–C506, (1985)Google Scholar
  56. G. Swann, N. Bailey, R. Batson, V. Freeman, M. Hait, J. Head, H. Holt, K. Howard, J. Irwin, G. Schaber, D. Scott, L. Silver, R. Sutton, G. Ulrich, H. Wilshire, E. Wolfe, Preliminary geologic investigations of the Apollo 15 landing site, Apollo 15 Preliminary Science Report, NASA SP–289, 5-1-5-112 (1972), http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/a15psr.html
  57. G. Ulrich, C. Hodges, W. Muehlberger, Geology of the apollo 16 area, central lunar highlands. USGS Prof Paper 1048, 1–539, (1981)Google Scholar
  58. D. Vaniman, J. Papike, in Lunar highland melt rocks: Chemistry, petrology, and silicate mineralogy, eds. by J. Papike, R. Merrill. Proceedings of the conference on the lunar highlands crust, (Pergamon, New York, 1980) pp. 271–337Google Scholar
  59. D. Vaniman, R. Reedy, G. Heiken, G. Olhoeft, W. Mendell, The Lunar Environment, in The lunar sourcebook, ed. by G. Heiken, D. Vaniman, B. French (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991), pp. 27–60Google Scholar
  60. B. Wood, Apollo 17 traverse planning data, 3rd edn. (1972), Reissued in 2008Google Scholar
  61. B. Wood, Apollo program summary report, JSC–09423 (1975), http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/APSR-JSC-09423.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic University of America, NASA/GSFCGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations