Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 721–729 | Cite as

The Master-Slave Stochastic Knapsack Modeling for Fully Dynamic Spectrum Allocation



Scarcity problem of radio spectrum resource stimulates the research on cognitive radio technology, in which dynamic spectrum allocation attracts lots of attention. For higher access efficiency in cognitive radio context, we suggest a fully dynamic access scheme for primary and secondary users, which is modeled by a master-slave stochastic knapsack process. Equilibrium behavior of this knapsack model is analyzed: expressions of blocking probability of both master and slave classes are derived as performance criterion, as well as forced termination probability for the slave class. All the theoretic results are verified by numeric simulations. Compared to traditional opportunistic spectrum access (OSA), which can be regarded as half dynamic due to primary users’ rough preemption, our scheme leads to less termination events for the secondary users while keeping the same performance for the primary class, thus promotes the system access performance. Nonideal spectrum sensing algorithm with detection error is also taken into consideration to evaluate its impact on system access performance, which is a practical issue for implementation.


blocking forced termination probability master-slave stochastic knapsack fully dynamic spectrum allocation nonideal spectrum sensing 



This work was supported by the National Major Special Projects in Science and Technology of China under Grant 2010ZX03003-001, 2010ZX03005-003, and 2011ZX03003-003-04, National Key Technology R&D Program under Grant 2008BAH30B12.


  1. 1.
    Mitola J (2000) Cognitive radio: an integrated agent atchitecture for software defined radio. Ph.D. dissertation, KTH, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Webb W (2007) Wireless communications: the future. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Federal Communications Commission (2005) Notice of proposed rule making and order: facilitating opportunities for flexible, efficient, and reliable spectrum use employing cognitive radio technologies. ET Docket No. 03-108Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haykin S (2005) Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 23(2):201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akyildiz IF, Lee W-Y et al (2006) Next generation dynamic spectrum access cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Comput Netw 50:2127–2159MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu X, Shen L, Yum T-SP (2007) Analysis of cognitive radio spectrum access with optimal channel reservation. IEEE Commun Lett 11(4):304–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diego Pacheco-Paramo VP, Martinez-Bauset J (2009) Optimal admission control in cognitive radio networks. In: Proc. 4th int. conf. on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and commun.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalil MA, Al-Mahdi H, Mitschele-Thiel A (2009) Analysis of opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive ad hoc networks. In: ASMTA 2009, pp 16–28Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stevenson C, Chouinard G, Lei Z, Hu W, Shellhammer S, Caldwell W (2009) IEEE 802.22: the first cognitive radio wireless regional area network standard. IEEE Commun Mag 47:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cabric D, Mishra SM, Brodersen RW (2004) Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. In: 38th Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, IEEE, vol 1, pp 772–776Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeng Y, Liang Y-C, Hoang AT, Zhang R (2010) A review on spectrum sensing for cognitive radio—challenges and solutions. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2010:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong X, Wang C, Chen H, Zhang Y (2009) Secondary spectrum access networks. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 4:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Capar E, Martoyo I, Weiss T, Jondral E (2002) Comparison of bandwidth utilization for controlled and uncontrolled channel assignment in a spectrum pooling system. In: 55th conference on vehicular techniques, IEEE, vol 3, pp 1069–1073Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martinez-Bauset J, Pla V, Pacheco-Paramo D (2009) Comments on ‘Analysis of cognitive radio spectrum access with optimal channel reservation’. IEEE Commun Lett 13:739Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Y, Ren P, Su Z (2011) A POMDP based distributed adaptive opportunistic spectrum access strategy for cognitive ad hoc networks. IEICE Trans Commun E94-B(06):1621–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yucek T, Arslan H (2009) A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 11(1):116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghasemi A, Sousa ES (2007) Optimization of spectrum sensing for opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. In: 4th conference on consumer communications and networking, IEEE, pp 1022–1026Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geirhofer S, Tong L, Sadler BM (2006) A measurement-based model for dynamic spectrum access in WLAN channels. In: IEEE military communications conference, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yin W, Ren P, Cai J, Su Z (2011) A pilot-aided detector for spectrum sensing of DVB-T signals in cognitive radio networks. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. doi: 10.1002/wcm.1170 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yin W, Ren P, Su Z, Ma R (2011) A multiple antenna spectrum sensing scheme based on space and time diversity in cognitive radios. IEICE Trans Commun E94-B(05):1254–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zeng Y, Liang Y (2009) Eigenvalue-based spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio. IEEE Trans Commun 57:1784–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liang Y-C, Zeng Y, Peh ECY, Hoang AT (2008) Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7:1326–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peh E, Liang Y-C (2007) Optimization for cooperative sensing in cognitive radio networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC’07), pp 27–32, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ghasemi A, Sousa E (2005) Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments. In: Proc. IEEE int. symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, pp 131–136, Baltimore, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gandetto M, Regazzoni C (2007) Spectrum sensing: a distributed approach for cognitive terminals. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 25:546–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ross KW, Hancock PJ (1995) Multiservice loss models for broadband telecommunication networks. Springer, New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wireless Information Network Lab., Department of Electronic Engineering and Information ScienceUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations