Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 12, Issue 5–6, pp 450–459 | Cite as

Coexistence of IEEE 802.11b and Bluetooth: An Integrated Performance Analysis

  • Min Song
  • Sachin Shetty
  • Deepthi Gopalpet


IEEE 802.11b wireless networks and Bluetooth networks provide complimentary services using the same unlicensed radio frequency band. As the benefits of utilizing these services become increasingly apparent, the likelihood of mutual interference also increases. The well-known frequency hopping algorithm and adaptive frequency hopping algorithm do not fully consider the interference level of the operating environment. In this paper an algorithm called interference-aware adaptive frequency hopping (IAFH) is presented and implemented on Bluetooth devices to mitigate the interference between IEEE 802.11b and Bluetooth wireless networks. An analytical model of IAFH is developed to evaluate the performance of 802.11b stations and Bluetooth devices in a mutual interference environment. The analysis comprises the collision probability, packet error rate, and throughput performance for both IEEE 802.11b and Bluetooth wireless networks. Simulation results confirm that 802.11b station and IAFH-enabled Bluetooth devices experience lower packet error rates and better throughput as compared to the frequency hopping and adaptive frequency hopping algorithms.


802.11b Bluetooth frequency hopping coexistence interference 



Min Song’s research is supported by NSF CAREER award CNS-0644247.


  1. 1.
    Conti A, Dardari D, Pasolini G, Andrisano O (2003) Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11b coexistence: analytical performance evaluation in fading channels.. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 21(2):259–269, FebCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golmie N, Rebala O, Chevrollier N (2003) Bluetooth adaptive frequency hopping and scheduling. IEEE MILCOM-2003 2:1138–1142, OctCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Golmie N (2004) Bluetooth dynamic scheduling and interference mitigation. ACM Mobile Network, MONETGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howitt I (2001) IEEE 802.11 and Bluetooth coexistence analysis methodology. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2:1114–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wadhwa M, Song M (2006) Performance of IEEE 802.11b Devices in the presence of adaptive frequency hopping enabled Bluetooth devices. Proc. of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education. Tel Aviv, Israel, OctGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cordeiro CM, Abhyankar S, Toshiwal R, Agarwal DP (2003) A novel architecture and coexistence method to provide global access to/from Bluetooth WPANs by IEEE 802.11 WLANs. Proc. IEEE Int Perform Comput Commun, pp 23–30Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golmie N, Chevrollier N, Rebala O (2003) Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence: challenges and solutions. IEEE Wireless Commun 10(6):22–29, DecCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howitt I (2001) WLAN and WPAN coexistence in UL band. Trans Veh Technol 50(4):1114–1124, JulyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng W, Nallanathan A, Krishna GN (2003) Performance of physical (PHY) and medium access control (MAC) layers of IEEE 802.11b in the presence of Bluetooth piconets. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2:1489–1492, AprGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Popovski P, Yomo H, Prasad R (2006) Dynamic adaptive frequency hopping for mutually interfering wireless personal area networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 5(8):991–1003, AugCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jo J-H, Jayant N (2003) Performance evaluation of multiple IEEE 802.11b WLAN stations in the presence of Bluetooth radio interference. IEEE J Commun 2:1163–1168, MayGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bamahdi OA, Zummo SA (2006) An adaptive frequency hopping technique with application to Bluetooth–WLAN coexistence. Proc. of International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies, Mauritius, AprGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    IEEE (1999) Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE Standard 802.11 [Online]. Available:
  14. 14.
    Specification of the Bluetooth system. Core, Version 2.0 [Online]. Available:, Nov. 2004
  15. 15.
    Roh JS (2000) Performance analysis and evaluation of Bluetooth networks in wireless channel environment. Proc. IEEE Int Conf Syst Netw Commun, pp 61–65Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ennis G (1998) Impact of Bluetooth on 802.11 direct sequence. IEEE P802.11 Working Group Contribution, IEEE P802.11-98/319, SepGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fumolari D (2001) Link performance of an embedded Bluetooth personal area network. Proc. of IEEE ICC’01, Helsinki, Finland, JuneGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Golmie N, Mouveaux F (2001) Interference in the 2.4 GHz ISM band: Impact on the Bluetooth access control performance. Proc IEEE ICC’01, Helsinki, Finland, JuneGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Golmie N, Van Dyck RE, Soltanian A (2001) Interference of Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11: Simulation modeling and performance evaluation. Proc. of the 4th ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, JulyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Howitt I, Mitter V, Gutierrez J (2001) Empirical study for IEEE 802.11 and Bluetooth interoperability. Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), SpringGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kamerman A (2000) Coexistence between Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11 CCK: solutions to avoid mutual interference. IEEE P802.11 Working Group Contribution, JulyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lansford J, Stephens A, Nevo R (2001) Wi-Fi (802.11b) and Bluetooth: enabling coexistence. IEEE Netw Mag, SepGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shellhammer S (2000) Packet error rate of an IEEE 802.11 WLAN in the presence of Bluetooth. IEEE P802.15 Working Group Contribution, MayGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zyren J (1999) Reliability of IEEE 802.11 WLANs in presence of Bluetooth radios. IEEE P802.11 Working Group Contribution, Sep.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zurbes S, Stahl W, Matheus K, Haartsen J (2000) Radio network performance of Bluetooth. Proc. of IEEE ICC 2000, JuneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations