Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of heat stress responsive factors on growth and physiology of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pakistan ranked highest with reference to average temperatures in cotton growing areas of the world. The heat waves are becoming more intense and unpredictable due to climate change. Identification of heat tolerant genotypes requires comprehensive screening using molecular, physiological and morphological analysis. Heat shock proteins play an important role in tolerance against heat stress. In the current study, eight heat stress responsive factors, proteins and genes (HSFA2, GHSP26, GHPP2A, HSP101, HSC70-1, HSP3, APX1 and ANNAT8) were evaluated morphologically and physiologically for their role in heat stress tolerance. For this purpose, cotton crop was grown at two temperature conditions i.e. normal weather and heat stress at 45 °C. For molecular analysis, genotypes were screened for the presence or absence of heat shock protein genes. Physiological analysis of genotypes was conducted to assess net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, leaf-air temperature and cell membrane stability under control as well as high temperature. The traits photosynthesis, cell membrane stability, leaf-air temperature and number of heat stress responsive factors in each genotypes showed a strong correlation with boll retention percentage under heat stress. The genotypes with maximum heat shock protein genes such as Cyto-177, MNH-886, VH-305 and Cyto-515 showed increased photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, negative leaf-air temperature and high boll retention percentage under heat stress condition. These varieties may be used as heat tolerant breeding material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu W, Zhou Z, Zhan D, Zhao W, Meng Y, Chen B, Liu W, Wang Y (2020) The difference in the formation of thermotolerance of two cotton cultivars with different heat tolerance. Arch Agron Soil Sci 66:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM (1997) A comparison of scenarios for the effect of global climate change on cotton growth and yield. Aust J Plant Physiol 24:707–713

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reddy KR, Brand D, Wijewardana C, Gao W (2017) Temperature effects on cotton seedling emergence, growth, and development. Agron J 109:1379–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li X, He X, Smith R, Choat B, Tissue D (2020) Temperature alters the response of hydraulic architecture to CO2 in cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum). Environ Exp Bot 172:104004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iqbal M, Ul-Allah S, Naeem M, Ijaz M, Sattar A, Sher A (2017) Response of cotton genotypes to water and heat stress: from field to genes. Euphytica 213:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loka DA, Oosterhuis DM, Baxevanos D, Noulas C, Hu W (2020) Single and combined effects of heat and water stress and recovery on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf physiology and sucrose metabolism. Plant PhysiolBiochem 148:166–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Virk G, Snider JL, Pilon C (2020) Associations between first true leaf physiology and seedling vigor in cotton under different field conditions. Crop Sci 60:404–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang S, Fu W, Zhang Z, Fan Y, Liu T (2017) Effects of elevated CO2 concentration and temperature on some physiological characteristics of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves. Environ Exp Bot 133:108–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabagh AE, Hossain A, Islam MS, Barutcular C, Ratnasekera D, Gormus O, Tariq M (2020) Drought and heat stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): consequences and their possible mitigation strategies. Agronomic Crops. Springer, Singapore, pp 613–634

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmad A, Ilyas MZ, Aslam Z, Roman M, Ali A, Naeem S, Nazar M, Rehman SU (2020) Physiological screening of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes against drought tolerance. Pure ApplBiol 9:140–147

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abro S, Rajput MT, Khan MA, Sial MA, Tahir SS (2015) Screening of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes for heat tolerance. Pak J Bot 47:2085–2091

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamil A, Khan SJ, Ullah K (2020) Genetic diversity for cell membrane thermostability, yield and quality attributes in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 67:1405–1414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karademir E, Karademir C, Sevilmis U, Basal H (2018) Correlations between canopy temperature, chlorophyll content and yield in heat tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes. Fresen Environ Bull 27:5230–5237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasanuzzaman M, Hossain MA, da Silva JAT, Fujita M (2012) Plant response and tolerance to abiotic oxidative stress: antioxidant defense is a key factor. Crop stress and its management: perspectives and strategies. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 261–315

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam M, Roychowdhury R, Fujita M (2013) Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int J MolSci 14:9643–9684

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fender SE, O’Connell MA (1989) Heat shock protein expression in thermotolerant and thermosensitive lines of cotton. Plant Cell Rep 8:37–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Momcilovic I, Ristic Z (2007) Expression of chloroplast protein synthesis elongation factor, EF-TU, in two lines of maize with contrasting tolerance to heat stress during early stages of plant development. J Plant Physiol 164:90–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haq S, Khan A, Ali M, Gai WX, Zhang HX, Yu QH, Gong ZH (2019) Knockdown of CaHSP60-6 confers enhanced sensitivity to heat stress in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Planta 250:2127–2145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sable A, Rai MK, Choudhary A, Yadav VK, Agarwal SK, Sawant SV (2018) Inhibition of Heat Shock proteins HSP90 and HSP70 induce oxidative stress, suppressing cotton fiber development. Sci Rep 8:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Usman MG, Rafii MY, Ismail MR, Malek MA, Latif MA, Oladosu Y (2014) Heat shock proteins: functions and response against heat stress in plants. Int J Sci Res 3(11):204–218

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Lu Y, Cantrell RG, Hughs E (2005) Molecular marker diversity and field performance in commercial cotton cultivars evaluated in the southwestern USA. Crop Sci 45:1483–1490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Burke JJ, Wanjura DF (2001) Opportunities for improving cotton’s tolerance to high temperature. ProcBeltwide Cotton ConfNati Cotton Counc Memphis TN 1453:54

    Google Scholar 

  23. Young TE, Ling J, Geisler-Lee CJ, Tanguay RL, Caldwell C, Gallie DR (2001) Developmental and thermal regulation of the maize heat shock protein, Hsp101. Plant Physiol 127:777–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong SW, Vierling E (2000) Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana defective in the acquisition of tolerance to high temperature stress. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 97:4392–4397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishizawa A, Yabuta Y, Yoshida E, Maruta T, Yoshimura K, Shigeoka S (2006) Arabidopsis heat shock transcription factor A2 as a key regulator in response to several types of environmental stress. Plant J 48:535–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshida T, Ohama N, Nakajima J, Kidokoro S, Mizoi J, Nakashima K, Maruyama K et al (2011) Arabidopsis HsfA1 transcription factors function as the main positive regulators in heat shock-responsive gene expression. Mol Genet Genom 286:321–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shi WM, Muramoto Y, Ueda A, Takabe T (2001) Cloning of peroxisomalascorbate peroxidase gene from barley and enhanced thermotolerance by overexpressing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 273:23–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cantero A, Barthakur S, Bushart TJ, Chou S, Morgan RO, Fernandez MP, Clark GB, Roux SJ (2006) Expression profiling of the Arabidopsisannexin gene family during germination, de-etiolation and abiotic stress. Plant PhysiolBiochem 44:13–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh RP, Prasad PV, Sunita K, Giri SN, Reddy KR (2007) Influence of high temperature and breeding for heat tolerance in cotton: a review. AdvAgron 93:313–385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Z, Shang H, Shi Y, Huang L, Li J, Ge Q, Gong J et al (2016) Construction of a high-density genetic map by specific locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-Seq) and its application to quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for boll weight in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). BMC Plant Biol 16(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat 1. Crop Sci 21:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fischer RA, Maurer R (1978) Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. 1. Grain-yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 29:897–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dewey RD, Lu KH (1959) A correlation and phenotypic correlation analysis of some quality characters and yield of seed cotton in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Int J BiolSci 1:235–236

    Google Scholar 

  35. Burton GW, Devane EH (1953) Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material 1. Agron J 45(10):478–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cottee NS, Wilson IW, Tan DK, Bange MP (2014) Understanding the molecular events underpinning cultivar differences in the physiological performance and heat tolerance of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Funct Plant Biol 41:56–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Burke JJ, Hatfield JL, Klein RR, Mullet JE (1985) Accumulation of heat shock proteins in field-grown cotton. Plant Physiol 78:394–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Larkindale J, Vierling E (2008) Core genome responses involved in acclimation to high temperature. Plant Physiol 146:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maqbool A, Abbas W, Rao AQ, Irfan M, Zahur M, Bakhsh A, Riazuddin S, Husnain T (2010) Gossypium arboreum GHSP26 enhances drought tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum. BiotechnolProg 26:21–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Qi Y, Wang H, Zou Y, Liu C, Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang W (2011) Over-expression of mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 suppresses programmed cell death in rice. FEBS Lett. 585:231–3941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van der Westhuizen MM, Oosterhuis DM, Berner JM, Boogaers N (2020) Chlorophyll a fluorescence as an indicator of heat stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). S Afr J Plant Soil 37:116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was part of the NRPU research project of HEC entitled “Marker assisted gene pyramiding for heat tolerance in cotton” Project ID: 7965. We are thankful to HEC for providing funds for this research work.

Funding

Source: Higher Education Commission Islamabad, Pakistan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bahauddin Zakaryia University, Multan, Pakistan

    Muhammad Asif Saleem, Waqas Malik, Abdul Qayyum, Muhammad Qadir Ahmad, Hammad Afzal & Muhammad Farjad Ateeq

  2. College of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Bahadur Sub-campus, Layyah, Pakistan

    Sami Ul-Allah

  3. State Key Lab. of Crop Genetics & Germplasm, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing, China

    Muhammad Waqas Amjid

  4. Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan

    Zia Ullah Zia

Authors
  1. Muhammad Asif Saleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Waqas Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdul Qayyum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sami Ul-Allah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Qadir Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hammad Afzal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muhammad Waqas Amjid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Muhammad Farjad Ateeq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zia Ullah Zia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MAS (PI), WM (Co-PI), AQ (Supervised Field work), SUA (data analysis), MQA (Supervised lab work), HA (Field work), MWA (manuscript preparation), MFA (Lab work) and ZUZ (Checked purity of research material in the field).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Asif Saleem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest with any journal, institute etc.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 138 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saleem, M.A., Malik, W., Qayyum, A. et al. Impact of heat stress responsive factors on growth and physiology of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mol Biol Rep 48, 1069–1079 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06217-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06217-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation