Advertisement

Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 41–49 | Cite as

Microsatellite marker set for genetic diversity assessment of primitive Chitala chitala (Hamilton, 1822) derived through SMRT sequencing technology

  • Nimisha Dutta
  • Rajeev K. SinghEmail author
  • Vindhya Mohindra
  • Abhinav Pathak
  • Raj Kumar
  • Priyanka Sah
  • Sangeeta Mandal
  • Gurjeet Kaur
  • Kuldeep K. Lal
Original Article
  • 184 Downloads

Abstract

In present study, single molecule-real time sequencing technology was used to obtain a validated set of microsatellite markers for application in population genetics of the primitive fish, Chitala chitala. Assembly of circular consensus sequencing reads resulted into 1164 sequences which contained 2005 repetitive motifs. A total of 100 sequences were used for primer designing and amplification yielded a set of 28 validated polymorphic markers. These loci were used to genotype n = 72 samples from three distant riverine populations of India, namely Son, Satluj and Brahmaputra, for determining intraspecific genetic variation. The microsatellite loci exhibited high level of polymorphism with PIC values ranging from 0.281 to 0.901. The genetic parameters revealed that mean heterozygosity ranged from 0.6802 to 0.6826 and the populations were found to be genetically diverse (Fst 0.03–0.06). This indicated the potential application of these microsatellite marker set that can used for stock characterization of C. chitala, in the wild. These newly developed loci were assayed for cross transferability in another notopterid fish, Notopterus notopterus.

Keywords

PacBio RSII Contigs NGS Population genetics Genotype Cross species amplification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the consistent support of the Director, ICAR-NBFGR, Lucknow during this work. The work was a part of ICAR plan funded project entitled, Outreach Activity on Fish Genetic Stocks, Phase II. We are thankful to Sh R.S. Sah and Sh Rajesh Kumar for their excellent technical assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bentzen P, Taggart CT, Ruzzante DE, Cook D (1996) Microsatellite polymorphism and the population structure of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the northwest Atlantic. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53(12):2706–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta A, Lal KK, Punia P, Singh RK, Mohindra V, Sah RS, Kumar R, Luhariya RK, Dwivedi AK, Masih P, Mishra RM (2013) Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers and genetic diversity in wild bronze featherback, Notopterus notopterus (Pallas,1769). Mol Biol Rep 40(12):6625–6631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Billotte N, Lagoda PJL, Risterucci AM, Baurens FC (1999) Microsatellite-enriched libraries: applied methodology for the development of SSR markers in tropical crops. Fruits 54(4):277–288Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloor PA, Barker FS, Watts PC, Noyes HA, Kemp SJ (2008) Microsatellite libraries by enrichment. Protocol available at: http://www.genomics.liv.ac.uk/animal/research/microsatellite
  5. 5.
    Luo W, Nie Z, Zhan F, Wei J, Wang W, Gao Z (2012) Rapid development of microsatellite markers for the endangered fish Schizothorax biddulphi (Günther) using next generation sequencing and cross-species amplification. Int J Mol Sci 13(11):14946–14955CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sahu BP, Sahoo L, Joshi CG, Mohanty P, Sundaray JK, Jayasankar P, Das P (2014) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in Indian major carp, Catla catla using next-generation sequencing platform. Biochem Syst Ecol 57:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu SR, Li JL, Xie N, Zhu LM, Wang Q, Yue GH (2014) Genetic diversity based on SSR analysis of the cultured snakehead fish, Channa argus,(Channidae) in China. Genet Mol Res 13:8046–8054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Travers KJ, Chin CS, Rank DR, Eid JS, Turner SW (2010) A flexible and efficient template format for circular consensus sequencing and SNP detection. Nucleic Acids Res 38(15):e159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grohme MA, Soler RF, Wink M, Frohme M (2013) Microsatellite marker discovery using single molecule real-time circular consensus sequencing on the Pacific Biosciences RS. Biotechniques 55(5):253–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wei NA, Bemmels JB, Dick CW (2014) The effects of read length, quality and quantity on microsatellite discovery and primer development: from Illumina to P ac B io. Mol Ecol Resour 14(5):953–965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tørresen OK, Star B, Jentoft S, Reinar WB, Grove H, Miller JR, Walenz BP, Knight J, Ekholm JM, Peluso P, Edvardsen RB (2017) An improved genome assembly uncovers prolific tandem repeats in Atlantic cod. BMC Genom 18(1):95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Froese R, Pauly D (2003) Fish Base WWW Electronic Publication. World Fish. http://www.fishbase.org
  13. 13.
    Mandal A, Mohindra V, Singh RK, Punia P, Singh AK, Lal KK (2012) Mitochondrial DNA variation in natural populations of endangered Indian Feather-Back Fish, Chitala chitala. Mol Biol Rep 39(2):1765–1775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaudhry S (2010) Chitala chitala. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T166510A6225101.  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.20104.RLTS.T166510A6225101.en
  15. 15.
    CAMP (1998) Report of the workshop on Freshwater Fishes of India, Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP), Zoo Outreach Organization/CBSG. Coimbatore and National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, p 164Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Punia P, Gupta HS, Singh RK, Mohindra V, Lal KK, Chauhan VS, Lakra WS (2006) Polymorphic microsatellite markers isolated from partially enriched genomic library of Chitala chitala. Mol Ecol Notes 6:1263–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ruzzante DE, Taggart CT, Cook D (1996) Spatial and temporal variation in the genetic composition of a larval cod (Gadus morhua) aggregation: cohort contribution and genetic stability. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53(12):2695–2705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh RK, Lal KK, Mohindra V, Punia P, Sah RS, Kumar R, Gupta A, Das R, Lakra WS, Ayyappan S (2012) Genetic diversity of Indian major carp, Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822) populations inferred from microsatellite loci. Biochem Syst Ecol 44:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li W, Godzik A (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22(13):1658–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG (2012) Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40(15):e115CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holleley CE, Geerts PG (2009) Multiplex Manager 1.0: a cross-platform computer program that plans and optimizes multiplex PCR. Biotechniques 46(7):511–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16(5):1099–1106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Resour 4(3):535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Belkhir K (1996–2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la genetique des populations. http://www.univmontp2.fr/~ genetix/genetix/genetix.htm
  26. 26.
    Raymond M (1998) GENEPOP (version 3.1). http://www.cefe.cnrs-mop.fr/
  27. 27.
    Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1:117693430500100003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg NA, Donnelly P (2000) Association mapping in structured populations. Am J Hum Genet 67(1):170–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zalapa JE, Cuevas H, Zhu H, Steffan S, Senalik D, Zeldin E, McCown B, Harbut R, Simon P (2012) Using next generation sequencing approaches to isolate simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in the plant sciences. Am J Bot 99(2):193–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Loomis EW, Eid JS, Peluso P, Yin J, Hickey L, Rank D, McCalmon S, Hagerman RJ, Tassone F, Hagerman PJ (2013) Sequencing the unsequenceable: expanded CGG-repeat alleles of the fragile X gene. Genome Res 23(1):121–128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ (2006) Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett 9(5):615–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    An HS, Kim JW, Lee JW, Kim SK, Lee BI, Kim DJ, Kim YC (2012) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for an endangered species, Epinephelus bruneus, to establish a conservation program. Anim Cells Syst 16(1):50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pimentel JS, Carmo AO, Rosse IC, Martins AP, Ludwig S, Facchin S, Pereira AH, Brandão-Dias PF, Abreu NL, Kalapothakis E (2018) High-throughput sequencing strategy for microsatellite genotyping using neotropical fish as a model. Front Genet 9:73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32(3):314PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wright S (1978) Evolution and the genetics of populations: a treatise in four volumes: vol. 4: variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    ECAFE (1966) A compendium of major international rivers in the ECAFE region Water Resources Ser. United Nation. No. 29Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nazia AK, Azizah MS (2014) Isolation of microsatellites in the bighead catfish, Clarias macrocephalus and cross-amplification in selected Clarias species. Mol Biol Rep 41(3):1207–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Masih P, Luhariya RK, Das R, Gupta A, Mohindra V, Singh RK, Srivastava R, Chauhan UK, Jena JK, Lal KK (2014) Cross-priming of microsatellite loci in subfamily cyprininae (family Cyprinidae): their utility in finding markers for population genetic analysis in three Indian major carps. Mol Biol Rep 41(8):5187–5197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Bureau of Fish Genetic ResourcesLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Amity Institute of BiotechnologyAmity University, Lucknow CampusLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations