Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 4083–4090 | Cite as

Molecular characterization and genetic structure of Quercus acutissima germplasm in China using microsatellites

  • Yuanyan Y. Zhang
  • Yanming M. Fang
  • Mukui K. Yu
  • Xuexia X. Li
  • Tao Xia


Quercus acutissima is native to eastern Asia. It has a wide distribution in China and China is an important component in understanding the ecology and genetic structure of this species. Q. acutissima attained high economic value for hardwood product and can be managed as an energy tree species. To investigate the genetic variation of Q. acutissima provenances, 12 microsatellite primer pairs were used to analyze 672 trees sampled from 28 provenances of Q. acutissima in China. All of the tested microsatellite loci proved to be effective for the studied Q. acutissima provenances. The results revealed that allele numbers varied from 5 to 13 per locus, with an average of 8 alleles per locus. The mean observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity were 0.4927 and 0.7023, respectively. The relatedness of the provenances was studied using the arithmetic mean algorithm based on Nei’s genetic distance and principal coordinates analysis. Interestingly, both approaches revealed two main groups: one consisted of the eastern Chinese provenances, and the other comprised of the western Chinese provenances. An analysis of molecular variance indicated that most genetic variation was contained within populations (84 %). The two microsatellite markers developed in this study may be employed for genetic characterization of other oak species. Considering the management or breeding programs of Q. acutissima provenances in China, we should treat each main group as a single gene resource.


Microsatellites Quercus acutissima Genetic structure Germplasm Provenance Management 



We would like to thank Dr. T. M. Yin for his valuable comments on the manuscript. We owe special thanks to Dr. Z. L. Liu for his previous work on collecting acorns of Q. acutissima. We would also like to acknowledge Y. Xia and Y. X. Chen for their contributions in collecting samples. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of C. P. Xie in the plotting of the geographic map using ArcGis. This work was supported by the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), the National Key Technology R&D Program (2008BAC39B01, 2008BAC39B06), the Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University, and the National Public Benefit Research Foundation of China (200704034).

Supplementary material

11033_2013_2486_MOESM1_ESM.tif (544 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIF 544 kb)


  1. 1.
    Huang CJ, Zhang YT, Bruce B (1999) Fagaceae. Flora of China 4:314–400Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung MY, Nason J, Chung MG, Kim KJ, Park CW, Sun BY, Pak JH (2002) Landscape-level spatial genetic structure in Quercus acutissima (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 89:1229–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu CQ, Liu H, Huo YH, Wang XL (2005) Study on directive cultivation of Quercus acutissima timber-forest for edible fungus. Jilin For Sci Technol 5:35–38 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aldrich PR, Parker GR, Ward JS, Michler CH (2003) Spatial dispersion of trees in an old-growth temperate hardwood forest over 60 years of succession. For Ecol Manage 180:475–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aldrich PR, Parker GR, Romero-Severson J, Michler CH (2005) Confirmation of oak recruitment failure in Indiana old-growth forest: 75 years of data. For Sci 51:406–416Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi HS, Kim YY, Hong KN, Hong YP, Hyun JO (2005) Genetic structure of a population of Quercus acutissima in Korea revealed by microsatellite markers. Korean J Genet 27:267–271Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greene SL, Morris JB (2001) The case for multiple-use plant germplasm collections and a strategy for implementation. Crop Sci 3:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peeters JP, Martinelli JA (1989) Hierarchical cluster analysis as a tool to manage variation in germplasm collections. Theor Appl Genet 78:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Odong TL, van Heerwaarden J, Jansen J, van Hintum TJL, van Eeuwijk FA (2011) Determination of genetic structure of germplasm collections: are traditional hierarchical clustering methods appropriate for molecular marker data? Theor Appl Genet 123:195–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang L, Zhao D, Yan C, Liu ZL, Fang SZ, Yu MK (2009) Effects of site conditions and methods of cultivation on growth of sawtooth oak plantations. Front For China 2:185–190 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu ZL, Yu MK, Tang LZ, Fang SZ (2009) Provinance variation and preliminary selection of Quercus acutissima seedlings. For Res 4:486–492 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang B, Yu MK, Wang C, Fang YM (2008) Variation of growth characters of Quercus acutissima seedlings from different provenances and its cluster analysis. J Plant Resour Environ 4:1–8 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kampfer S, Lexer C, Glössl J, Steinkellner H (1998) Characterization of (GA)n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129:183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steinkellner H, Lexer C, Turetschek E, Glössl J (1997) Conservation of (GA)n microsatellite loci between Quercus species. Mol Ecol 6:1189–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dow BD, Ashley MV, Howe HF (1995) Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theor Appl Genet 91:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996) Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of samplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol Ecol 5:615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azpilicueta MM, Caron H, Bodénès C, Gallo LA (2004) SSR markers for analyzing South American Nothofagus species. Silvae Genet 53:240–243Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yeh FC, Boyle TJB (1997) Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Bel J Bot 29:156–159Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx6: genetic analysis in excel Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system Version 2.1 Exetersoftware, Setauket, NYGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4(3):535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bezault E, Balaresque P, Toguyeni A et al (2011) Spatial and temporal variation in population genetic structure of wild Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) across Africa. BMC Genet 12:102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slavov GT, Howe GT, Gyaourova AV, Birkes DS, Adams WT (2005) Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: accounting for mistyping. Mol Ecol 14:3109–3121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lopes T, Pinto G, Loureiro J, Costa A, Santos C (2006) Determination of genetic stability in long-term somatic embryogenic cultures and derived plantlets of cork oak using microsatellite markers. Tree Physiol 26:1145–1152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Durand J et al (2010) A fast and cost-effective approach to develop and map EST-SSR markers: oak as a case study. BMC Genomics 11:570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chung MY, Chung MG, Myers ER, Chung JM, Kim KJ, Park CW, Sun BY, Pak JH (2004) Spatial genetic structure in disturbed populations of Quercus acutissima (Fagaceae). Silvae Genet 53:206–211Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee YJ, Hwang SY, Ho KC, Lin TP (2006) Source populations of Quercus glauca in the last glacial age in Taiwan revealed by nuclear microsatellite markers. J Hered 97:261–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pakkad G, Ueno S, Yoshimaru H (2008) Genetic diversity and differentiation of Quercus semiserrata Roxb in northern Thailand revealed by nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers. For Ecol Manage 255:1067–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Austerlitz F, Mariette S, Machon N, Gouyon PH, Godelle B (2000) Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154:1309–1321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ramírez-Valiente JA, Valladares F, Huertas AD, Granados S, Aranda I (2010) Factors affecting cork oak growth under dry conditions: local adaptation and contrasting additive genetic variance within populations. Tree Genet Genomes 7:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neophytou C, Aravanopoulos FA, Fink S, Dounavi A (2010) Detecting interspecific and geographic differentiation patterns in two interfertile oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl and Q robur L) using small sets of microsatellite markers. For Ecol Manage 259:2026–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalinowski ST (2005) Hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Estoup A, Rousset F, Michalakis Y, Cornuet JM, Adriamanga M, Guyomard R (1998) Comparative analysis of microsatellite and allozyme markers: a case study investigating microgeographic differentiation in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Mol Ecol 7:339–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuanyan Y. Zhang
    • 1
  • Yanming M. Fang
    • 1
  • Mukui K. Yu
    • 2
  • Xuexia X. Li
    • 1
  • Tao Xia
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Research Institute of Subtropical ForestryFuyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations