Skip to main content
Log in

Mexican mestizo population sub-structure: effects on genetic and forensic statistical parameters

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since Mexican mestizos are an admixed population, it is necessary to determine the effects that the substructure of the population has on genetic and forensic parameters. With this aim, a study was performed with 15 STR loci (CODIS plus D2S1338 and D19S433) on 1,640 unrelated Mexican mestizos. We determine allele and genotypic frequencies observing departure from Hardy–Weinberg expectation (12 out of 15 loci, with an excess of homozygotes, Fis > 0), as well as pairs of loci in an apparent linkage disequilibrium (13 of 92 loci). We conducted a test for genetic population stratification, the results show that the Mexican mestizo population is substructured into three subgroups, which are in HW and linkage equilibrium. The combination of the 15 loci in the whole population has high forensic efficiency with the capacity to genetically discriminate one individual in one quintillion (1/1018). Our data potentially validates the use of these 15 STR loci to establish forensic identity and parentage testing for legal purposes, and offers a powerful tool for genetic variation analysis. However, given that the population is stratified, we highly recommend applying a correction with the inbreeding coefficient in calculations of paternity and forensic studies to avoid erroneous assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

STR:

Short tandem repeat

W&C:

Weir and Cockerham method (1984)

HW:

Hardy–Weinberg

HWE:

Hardy–Weinberg expectation

HWD:

Hardy–Weinberg departure

LD:

Linkage disequilibrium

References

  1. Aguirre-Beltrán G (1989) La población negra de México. Estudio etnohistórico, vol 2. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crawford MH (1998) The origin of Native Americans. Evidence from anthropological genetics. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook SF, Borah W (1971) Essays in population history: Mexico and the Caribbean. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

  4. Salazar-Flores J, Dondiego-Aldape R, Rubi-Castellanos R, Anaya-Palafox M, Nuno-Arana I, Canseco-Avila LM, Flores-Flores G, Morales-Vallejo ME, Barojas-Perez N, Munoz-Valle JF, Campos-Gutierrez R, Rangel-Villalobos H (2010) Population structure and paternal admixture landscape on present-day Mexican-Mestizos revealed by Y-STR haplotypes. Am J Hum Biol 22(3):401–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lisker R, Ramirez E, Babinsky V (1996) Genetic structure of autochthonous populations of Meso-America: Mexico. Hum Biol 68(3):395–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Juarez-Cedillo T, Zuniga J, Acuna-Alonzo V, Perez-Hernandez N, Rodriguez-Perez JM, Barquera R, Gallardo GJ, Sanchez-Arenas R, Garcia-Pena Mdel C, Granados J, Vargas-Alarcon G (2008) Genetic admixture and diversity estimations in the Mexican Mestizo population from Mexico City using 15 STR polymorphic markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(3):e37–e39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubi-Castellanos R, Martinez-Cortes G, Munoz-Valle JF, Gonzalez-Martin A, Cerda-Flores RM, Anaya-Palafox M, Rangel-Villalobos H (2009) Pre-Hispanic Mesoamerican demography approximates the present-day ancestry of Mestizos throughout the territory of Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol 139(3):284–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler JM (2006) Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. J Forensic Sci 51(2):253–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A (2009) Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science. Croat Med J 50(3):207–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montelius K, Karlsson AO, Holmlund G (2008) STR data for the AmpFlSTR Identifiler loci from Swedish population in comparison to European, as well as with non-European population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(3):e49–e52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brisighelli F, Capelli C, Boschi I, Garagnani P, Lareu MV, Pascali VL, Carracedo A (2009) Allele frequencies of fifteen STRs in a representative sample of the Italian population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 3(2):e29–e30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caragine T, Mikulasovich R, Tamariz J, Bajda E, Sebestyen J, Baum H, Prinz M (2009) Validation of testing and interpretation protocols for low template DNA samples using AmpFlSTR Identifiler. Croat Med J 50(3):250–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haliti N, Carapina M, Masic M, Strinovic D, Klaric IM, Kubat M (2009) Evaluation of population variation at 17 autosomal STR and 16 Y-STR haplotype loci in Croatians. Forensic Sci Int Genet 3(4):e137–e138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen DP, Tseng CP, Tsai SH, Wang MC, Lu SC, Wu TL, Chang PY, Sun CF (2009) Use of X-linked short tandem repeats loci to confirm mutations in parentage caseworks. Clin Chim Acta 408(1–2):29–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tishkoff SA, Reed FA, Friedlaender FR, Ehret C, Ranciaro A, Froment A, Hirbo JB, Awomoyi AA, Bodo JM, Doumbo O, Ibrahim M, Juma AT, Kotze MJ, Lema G, Moore JH, Mortensen H, Nyambo TB, Omar SA, Powell K, Pretorius GS, Smith MW, Thera MA, Wambebe C, Weber JL, Williams SM (2009) The genetic structure and history of Africans and African Americans. Science 324(5930):1035–1044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Manamperi A, Hapuarachchi C, Gunawardene NS, Bandara A, Dayanath D, Abeyewickreme W (2009) STR polymorphisms in Sri Lanka: evaluation of forensic utility in identification of individuals and parentage testing. Ceylon Med J 54(3):85–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reid TM, Baird ML, Reid JP, Lee SC, Lee RF (2008) Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(4):340–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gill P, Urquhart A, Millican E, Oldroyd N, Watson S, Sparkes R, Kimpton CP (1996) A new method of STR interpretation using inferential logic-development of a criminal intelligence database. Int J Legal Med 109(1):14–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons TJ, Huel R, Davoren J, Katzmarzyk C, Milos A, Selmanovic A, Smajlovic L, Coble MD, Rizvic A (2007) Application of novel “mini-amplicon” STR multiplexes to high volume casework on degraded skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1(2):175–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou R, An L, Wang X, Shao W, Lin G, Yu W, Yi L, Xu S, Xu J, Xie X (2007) Testing the hypothesis of an ancient Roman soldier origin of the Liqian people in northwest China: a Y-chromosome perspective. J Hum Genet 52(7):584–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Basu A, Tang H, Zhu X, Gu CC, Hanis C, Boerwinkle E, Risch N (2008) Genome-wide distribution of ancestry in Mexican Americans. Hum Genet 124(3):207–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. National Research Council N (1996) The evaluation of Forensic DNA evidence. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  23. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Goudet J (2002) Institute of Ecology, Biology Building, UNIL, CH-1015 Laussane, Switzerland

  25. Belkhir KBP, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996–2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II. Montpellier (France)

  26. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barrot C, Sanchez C, Ortega M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Brand-Casadevall C, Gorostiza A, Huguet E, Corbella J, Gene M (2005) Characterisation of three Amerindian populations from Hidalgo State (Mexico) by 15 STR-PCR polymorphisms. Int J Legal Med 119(2):111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubi-Castellanos R, Anaya-Palafox M, Mena-Rojas E, Bautista-Espana D, Munoz-Valle JF, Rangel-Villalobos H (2009) Genetic data of 15 autosomal STRs (Identifiler kit) of three Mexican Mestizo population samples from the States of Jalisco (West), Puebla (Center), and Yucatan (Southeast). Forensic Sci Int Genet 3(3):e71–e76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gorostiza A, Gonzalez-Martin A, Ramirez CL, Sanchez C, Barrot C, Ortega M, Huguet E, Corbella J, Gene M (2007) Allele frequencies of the 15 AmpF/Str Identifiler loci in the population of Metztitlan (Estado de Hidalgo), Mexico. Forensic Sci Int 166(2–3):230–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cerda-Flores RM, Budowle B, Jin L, Barton SA, Deka R, Chakraborty R (2002) Maximum likelihood estimates of admixture in Northeastern Mexico using 13 short tandem repeat loci. Am J Hum Biol 14(4):429–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rousset F (2004) Genetic structure and selection in subdivided populations. In: Monographs in population biology, vol 40. USA

  32. Rousset F, Raymond M (1995) Testing heterozygote excess and deficiency. Genetics 140(4):1413–1419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Albeza MV, Picornell A, Acreche N, Tomas C, Castro JA, Ramon MM (2002) Genetic variability at 14 STR loci in the Puna population of north western Argentina. Int J Legal Med 116(3):126–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Overall AD, Nichols RA (2001) A method for distinguishing consanguinity and population substructure using multilocus genotype data. Mol Biol Evol 18(11):2048–2056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright S (1950) Genetical structure of populations. Nature 166(4215):247–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19(3):395–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF (1999) The genetics of human population. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  38. Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236(4803):787–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hastings A, Harrison S (1994) Metapopulation dynamics and genetics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ward RD, Woodward M, Skibinski DOF (1994) A comparison of genetic diversity levels in marine, freshwater, and anadromous fishes. J Fish Biol 44:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4):1567–1587

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lisker R, Malacara A, Ramirez E, Mutchinik O (2004) Admixture estimates in a Mexican population stratified by socioeconomic status. Am J Phys Anthropol 123(S38):136

    Google Scholar 

  43. Buentello-Malo L, Penaloza-Espinosa RI, Salamanca-Gomez F, Cerda-Flores RM (2008) Genetic admixture of eight Mexican indigenous populations: based on five polymarker, HLA-DQA1, ABO, and RH loci. Am J Hum Biol 20(6):647–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Silva-Zolezzi I, Hidalgo-Miranda A, Estrada-Gil J, Fernandez-Lopez JC, Uribe-Figueroa L, Contreras A, Balam-Ortiz E, del Bosque-Plata L, Velazquez-Fernandez D, Lara C, Goya R, Hernandez-Lemus E, Davila C, Barrientos E, March S, Jimenez-Sanchez G (2009) Analysis of genomic diversity in Mexican Mestizo populations to develop genomic medicine in Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(21):8611–8616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hernandez-Gutierrez S, Hernandez-Franco P, Martinez-Tripp S, Ramos-Kuri M, Rangel-Villalobos H (2005) STR data for 15 loci in a population sample from the central region of Mexico. Forensic Sci Int 151(1):97–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gorodezky C, Alaez C, Vazquez-Garcia MN, de la Rosa G, Infante E, Balladares S, Toribio R, Perez-Luque E, Munoz L (2001) The genetic structure of Mexican Mestizos of different locations: tracking back their origins through MHC genes, blood group systems, and microsatellites. Hum Immunol 62(9):979–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang S, Ray N, Rojas W, Parra MV, Bedoya G, Gallo C, Poletti G, Mazzotti G, Hill K, Hurtado AM, Camrena B, Nicolini H, Klitz W, Barrantes R, Molina JA, Freimer NB, Bortolini MC, Salzano FM, Petzl-Erler ML, Tsuneto LT, Dipierri JE, Alfaro EL, Bailliet G, Bianchi NO, Llop E, Rothhammer F, Excoffier L, Ruiz-Linares A (2008) Geographic patterns of genome admixture in Latin American Mestizos. PLoS Genet 4(3):e1000037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Martinez-Marignac VL, Valladares A, Cameron E, Chan A, Perera A, Globus-Goldberg R, Wacher N, Kumate J, McKeigue P, O’Donnell D, Shriver MD, Cruz M, Parra EJ (2007) Admixture in Mexico City: implications for admixture mapping of type 2 diabetes genetic risk factors. Hum Genet 120(6):807–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gallo JC, Thomas E, Novick GE, Herrera RJ (1997) Effects of subpopulation structure on probability calculations of DNA profiles from forensic PCR analysis. Genetica 101(1):1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lander ES (1989) DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature 339(6225):501–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Distrito Federal (ICYT-DF), contract grant number: MLMM-ICYT. We thank María del Pilar Figueroa-Corona, M. Sc., Leonor C. Acosta-Saavedra, M. Sc., Pascual Francisco Lucio-Monter and Francisco J. Castañeda-Montes for technical assistance. We also thank Biología Molecular Diagnóstica S.A. de C.V. and her coworkers for helping in the logistics of sample collection and processing. In addition, we thank Laboratotrio Multidisciplinario de Investigación de la Escuela Militar de Graduados de Sanidad for logistic assistance. We thank the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and its PhD in Biomedical Ciences program for the scholarship granted to G. Noris during his undergraduate formation. Finally we wish to thank the journal’s anonymous reviewers for their very useful commentaries and suggestions in the writing of this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, they have no financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocío Gómez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noris, G., Santana, C., Meraz-Ríos, M.A. et al. Mexican mestizo population sub-structure: effects on genetic and forensic statistical parameters. Mol Biol Rep 39, 10139–10156 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1888-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1888-1

Keywords

Navigation