Variant allele of CHEK2 is associated with a decreased risk of esophageal cancer lymph node metastasis in a Chinese population
- 245 Downloads
Growing evidence suggests that the checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) signaling pathway occupies a central position in the signaling networks of DNA-damage signaling. Many functional and molecular epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between genetic variants of CHEK2 and various cancers. To evaluate the relationship between CHEK2 functional genetic variants and esophageal cancer risk and the risk of lymph node metastasis among a Chinese population. We genotyped CHEK2 rs738722, rs2236141 and rs2236142 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry assay in a case–controlled study, including 380 esophageal cancer cases and 380 healthy controls in a Chinese population. We found that none of the three polymorphisms achieved significant difference in their distributions between esophageal cancer cases and controls. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that esophageal cancer risk was not associated significantly with the variant genotypes of the three CHEK2 polymorphisms as compared with their wild-type genotypes. However, we found that functional variant rs738722 and rs2236142 in CHEK2 might contribute to susceptibility to lymph node metastasis. Our data did not support a significant association between CHEK2 SNPs and the risk of esophageal cancer. Functional variant CHEK2 rs738722 and rs2236142 might contribute to lymph node metastasis susceptibility. The CT allele of SNP rs738722 and the GC allele of SNP rs2236142 might be a protective factor of the risk for lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer.
KeywordsCHEK2 Polymorphisms Esophageal cancer Lymph node metastasis Molecular epidemiology
Checkpoint kinase 2
Single nucleotide polymorphisms
This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101889), the Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation (BK2009207) and Social Development Foundation of Zhenjiang (SH2010017).
- 1.Kapeller P, Barber R, Vermeulen RJ, Ader H, Scheltens P, Freidl W, Almkvist O, Moretti M, del Ser T, Vaghfeldt P, Enzinger C, Barkhof F, Inzitari D, Erkinjunti T, Schmidt R, Fazekas F (2003) Visual rating of age-related white matter changes on magnetic resonance imaging: scale comparison, interrater agreement, and correlations with quantitative measurements. Stroke 34:441–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Chaturvedi P, Eng WK, Zhu Y, Mattern MR, Mishra R, Hurle MR, Zhang X, Annan RS, Lu Q, Faucette LF, Scott GF, Li X, Carr SA, Johnson RK, Winkler JD, Zhou BB (1999) Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Oncogene 18:4047–4054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zhang S, Lu J, Zhao X, Wu W, Wang H, Lu J, Wu Q, Chen X, Fan W, Chen H, Wang F, Hu Z, Jin L, Wei Q, Shen H, Huang W, Lu D (2010) A variant in the CHEK2 promoter at a methylation site relieves transcriptional repression and confers reduced risk of lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 31:1251–1258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hung RJ, Baragatti M, Thomas D, McKay J, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Zaridze D, Lissowska J, Rudnai P, Fabianova E, Mates D, Foretova L, Janout V, Bencko V, Chabrier A, Moullan N, Canzian F, Hall J, Boffetta P, Brennan P (2007) Inherited predisposition of lung cancer: a hierarchical modeling approach to DNA repair and cell cycle control pathways. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:2736–2744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Cybulski C, Gorski B, Huzarski T, Masojc B, Mierzejewski M, Debniak T, Teodorczyk U, Byrski T, Gronwald J, Matyjasik J, Zlowocka E, Lenner M, Grabowska E, Nej K, Castaneda J, Medrek K, Szymanska A, Szymanska J, Kurzawski G, Suchy J, Oszurek O, Witek A, Narod SA, Lubinski J (2004) CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet 75:1131–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Dong X, Wang L, Taniguchi K, Wang X, Cunningham JM, McDonnell SK, Qian C, Marks AF, Slager SL, Peterson BJ, Smith DI, Cheville JC, Blute ML, Jacobsen SJ, Schaid DJ, Tindall DJ, Thibodeau SN, Liu W (2003) Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet 72:270–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Abnet CC, Freedman ND, Hu N, Wang Z, Yu K, Shu XO, Yuan JM, Zheng W, Dawsey SM, Dong LM, Lee MP, Ding T, Qiao YL, Gao YT, Koh WP, Xiang YB, Tang ZZ, Fan JH, Wang C, Wheeler W, Gail MH, Yeager M, Yuenger J, Hutchinson A, Jacobs KB, Giffen CA, Burdett L, Fraumeni JF Jr, Tucker MA, Chow WH, Goldstein AM, Chanock SJ, Taylor PR (2010) A shared susceptibility locus in PLCE1 at 10q23 for gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 42:764–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Easton D, McGuffog L, Thompson D, Dunning A, Tee L, Baynes C, Healey C, Pharoah P, Ponder B, Seal S, Barfoot R, Sodha N, Eeles R, Stratton M, Rahman N, Peto J, Spurdle AB, Chen XQ, Chenevix-Trench G, Hopper JL, Giles GG, McCredie MRE, Syrjakoski K, Holli K, Kallioniemi O, Eerola H, Vahteristo P, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H, Kataja V, Mannermaa A, Dork T, Bremer M, Devilee P, de Bock GH, Krol-Warmerdam EMM, Kroese-Jansema K, Wijers-Koster P, Cornelisse CJ, Tollenaar R, Meijers-Heijboer H, Berns E, Nagel J, Foekens J, Klijn JGM, Schutte M (2004) CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. Am J Hum Genet 74:1175–1182Google Scholar
- 30.Zhang S, Phelan CM, Zhang P, Rousseau F, Ghadirian P, Robidoux A, Foulkes W, Hamel N, McCready D, Trudeau M, Lynch H, Horsman D, De Matsuda ML, Aziz Z, Gomes M, Costa MM, Liede A, Poll A, Sun P, Narod SA (2008) Frequency of the CHEK2 1100delC mutation among women with breast cancer: an international study. Cancer Res 68:2154–2157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar