Advertisement

Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 4003–4006 | Cite as

Eyes wide open: the (mis)use of combined power of discrimination for X-linked short tandem repeats

  • Enrique Medina-Acosta
  • Filipe Brum Machado
Article

In the field of Genetic Epidemiology it is well established that ignoring interallelic multipoint gametic disequilibrium (GD) introduces false-positive evidence of linkage for sib-pair (kinship) analysis, especially in cases of sample deficiencies [1]. In the field of Forensic Genetics this proven concept is, in stark contrast, largely trivialized or ignored. There is an alarming accrual of forensic reports (Online Resource 1) announcing population data on short tandem repeats loci mapping on X chromosome (X-STRs) in which the product rule is applied to syntenic loci (i.e., being located on the same chromosome whether or not there is demonstrable genetic linkage between them), mostly ignoring the second law of Mendelian inheritance, and fundamental notions on genetic linkage status. We believe that the issue has been utterly disregarded, and thus it can no longer go unnoticed without opinion.

We center our opinion at the most crucial aspect that underlies meaningful calculation of...

Keywords

Short Tandem Repeat Product Rule Short Tandem Repeat Locus Gametic Disequilibrium Tandem Repeat Locus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

11033_2010_518_MOESM1_ESM.doc (36 kb)
ESM_1 List (chronological order) of research articles in the field of Forensic Genetics reporting combined power of discrimination (CPD) values using syntenic tetrameric and pentameric microsatellite loci on human X chromosome (X-STRs). The list was generated using the EndNote (Thomson Reuters) reference manager software and an internet connection to PubMed through July 24th, 2010 (DOC 36 kb)
11033_2010_518_MOESM2_ESM.doc (151 kb)
ESM_2 The complete list of marker systems used in the ten studies from which Combined Power of Discrimination (CPD) values were taken to calculate combined match probability (CMP) values plotted in Fig. 1 (main typescript) (DOC 151 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Huang Q, Shete S, Amos CI (2004) Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis. Am J Hum Genet 75:1106–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Medina-Acosta E (2010) Evidence of partial and weak gametic disequilibrium across clusters of pericentromeric short tandem repeats loci on human X chromosome: Proceed with caution in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.12.002
  3. 3.
    Schaffner SF (2004) The X chromosome in population genetics. Nat Rev Genet 5:43–51. doi: 10.1038/nrg1247 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hedrick PW (1987) Gametic disequilibrium measures: proceed with caution. Genetics 117:331–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewontin RC (1964) The interaction of selection and linkage I. general considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49:49–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brenner CH (2010) Fundamental problem of forensic mathematics—the evidential value of a rare haplotype. Forensic Sci Int Genet. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.10.013
  7. 7.
    Pinto N, Gusmao L, Amorim A (2010) X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial. Forensic Sci Int Genet. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.01.011
  8. 8.
    Butler JM (2006) Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. J Forensic Sci 51:253–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00046.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tillmar AO, Mostad P, Egeland T, Lindblom B, Holmlund G, Montelius K (2008) Analysis of linkage and linkage disequilibrium for eight X-STR markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 3:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.09.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aler M, Sanchez-Diz P, Gomes I, Gisbert M, Carracedo A, Amorim A, Gusmao L (2007) Genetic data of 10 X-STRs in a Spanish population sample. Forensic Sci Int 173:193–196. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.10.023 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pereira R, Gomes I, Amorim A, Gusmao L (2007) Genetic diversity of 10 X chromosome STRs in northern Portugal. Int J Legal Med 121:192–197. doi: 10.1007/s00414-006-0144-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pico A, Castillo A, Vargas C, Amorim A, Gusmao L (2008) Genetic profile characterization and segregation analysis of 10 X-STRs in a sample from Santander, Colombia. Int J Legal Med 122:347–351. doi: 10.1007/s00414-007-0215-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gusmão L, Sanchez-Diz P, Alves C, Gomes I, Zarrabeitia MT, Abovich M, Atmetlla I, Bobillo C, Bravo L, Builes J, Caine L, Calvo R, Carvalho E, Carvalho M, Cicarelli R, Catelli L, Corach D, Espinoza M, Garcia O, Malaghini M, Martins J, Pinheiro F, Joao Porto M, Raimondi E, Riancho JA, Rodriguez A, Rodriguez Cardozo B, Schneider V, Silva S, Tavares C, Toscanini U, Vullo C, Whittle M, Yurrebaso I, Carracedo A, Amorim A (2009) A GEP-ISFG collaborative study on the optimization of an X-STR decaplex: data on 15 Iberian and Latin American populations. Int J Legal Med 123:227–234. doi: 10.1007/s00414-008-0309-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bobillo C, Sala A, Gusmao L, Corach D (2010) Genetic analysis of 10 X-STRs in Argentinian population. Forensic Sci Int Genet. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.11.005
  15. 15.
    Nakamura Y, Minaguchi K (2010) Sixteen X-chromosomal STRs in two octaplex PCRs in Japanese population and development of 15-locus multiplex PCR system. Int J Legal Med. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0467-z
  16. 16.
    Tie J, Uchigasaki S, Oshida S (2010) Genetic polymorphisms of eight X-chromosomal STR loci in the population of Japanese. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4:e105–e108. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.09.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li L, Li C, Zhang S, Zhao S, Liu Y, Lin Y (2010) Analysis of 14 highly informative SNP markers on X chromosome by TaqMan® SNP genotyping assay. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4(5):e145–e148. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.04.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freitas NS, Resque RL, Ribeiro-Rodrigues EM, Guerreiro JF, Santos NP, Ribeiro-Dos-Santos A, Santos S (2010) X-linked insertion/deletion polymorphisms: forensic applications of a 33-markers panel. Int J Legal Med 124(6):589–593. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0441-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodrigues EL, Machado FB, Arruda MM, de Moura-Neto RS, Medina-Acosta E (2009) Genetic data on 15 STR autosomal loci for a sample population of the Northern Region of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4:e25–e26. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.01.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matise TC, Chen F, Chen W, De La Vega FM, Hansen M, He C, Hyland FC, Kennedy GC, Kong X, Murray SS, Ziegle JS, Stewart WC, Buyske S (2007) A second-generation combined linkage physical map of the human genome. Genome Res 17:1783–1786. doi: 10.1101/gr.7156307 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tease C, Hartshorne GM, Hulten MA (2002) Patterns of meiotic recombination in human fetal oocytes. Am J Hum Genet 70:1469–1479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fracasso T, Schurenkamp M, Brinkmann B, Hohoff C (2008) An X-STR meiosis study in Kurds and Germans: allele frequencies and mutation rates. Int J Legal Med 122:353–356. doi: 10.1007/s00414-008-0231-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hering S, Edelmann J, Augustin C, Kuhlisch E, Szibor R (2009) X chromosomal recombination-a family study analysing 39 STR markers in German three-generation pedigrees. Int J Legal Med 124(5):483–491. doi: 10.1007/s00414-009-0387-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Núcleo de Diagnóstico e Investigação MolecularUniversidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy RibeiroCampos dos GoytacazesBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Genética, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Biotecnologia, Centro de Biociências e BiotecnologiaUniversidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy RibeiroCampos dos GoytacazesBrazil

Personalised recommendations