Abstract
The light harvesting complexes, including LHII and LHI, are the important components of photosynthetic apparatus. Rhodovulum (Rdv.) sulfidophilum and Rhodobacter (R.) sphaeroides belong to two genera of photosynthetic bacteria, and they are very different in some physiological characteristics and light harvesting complexes structure. The LHII structural genes (pucBsAs) from Rdv. sulfidophilum and the LHI structural genes (pufBA) from R. sphaeroides were amplified, and cloned into an expression vector controlled by puc promoter from R. sphaeroides, which was then introduced into LHI and LHII-minus R. sphaeroides mutants; the transconjugant strains synthesized heterologous LHII and native LHI complexes, which played normal roles in R. sphaeroides. The Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII complex from pucBsAs had near-infrared absorption bands at ~801–853 nm in R. sphaeroides, and was able to transfer energy efficiently to the native LHI complex. The results show that the pucBsAs genes from Rdv. sulfidophilum could be expressed in R. sphaeroides, and the functional foreign LHII and native LHI were assembled into the membrane of R. sphaeroides.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Photosynthesis is the single most important process developed by nature, providing all of the biological energy needed for higher forms of life to exist, because it represents a highly efficient and productive means of converting solar energy into chemical energy.
The photosynthetic apparatus of purple photosynthetic bacteria contains three major carotenoid–bacteriochlorophyll (Bchl) protein complexes, B800-850 (LHII) and B875 (LHI), which are light-harvesting complexes, and the reaction center (RC) complex, the pigment protein complexes carry out light harvesting and primary photochemistry [1, 2]. The light harvesting complex I (LHI) absorbs maximally in the near-infrared at approximately 875 nm, LHI receives energy from the peripheral light harvesting complex (LHII), which has absorption bands at 800 and 850 nm. Both types of LH complexes are composed of two membrane spanning polypeptides, α and β, that anchor bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoids in the membrane [3, 4].
Rhodovulum (Rdv.) sulfidophilum and Rhodobacter (R.) sphaeroides belong to two different genera of photosynthetic bacteria. Rdv. sulfidophilum, in contrast to R. sphaeroides, has some different characters [5].
Compared with the LHII of nonsulfur purple bacterium R. sphaeroides, the LHII of Rdv. sulfidophilum exhibits a number of unusual characteristics: (1) the primary structure of the α-subunit of the peripheral antenna complex is unusual in having a high methionine content 4 Met vs. 1 in R. sphaeroides, a cysteine residue, and a free aspartyl carboxyl group near the C-terminus; (2) The pucBs encoded-apoprotein of Rdv. sulfidophilum exhibited 82% similarity to the pucB encoded-apoprotein of R. sphaeroides. The PucA protein of Rdv. sulfidophilum undergoes C-terminal processing to remove 11 amino acid residues, resulting in a mature protein that is two amino acids shorter than PucA of R. sphaeroides, a comparison of the Rdv. sulfidophilum pucAs encoded-apoprotein and the R. sphaeroides pucA encoded apoprotein revealed 54% similarity, furthermore, 12 amino acid residues of transmembrane helices are dissimilar. The similarity level of the pucB encoded-apoprotein between R. sphaeroides and Rdv. sulfidophilum are higher than which of the pucA encoded-apoprotein. The identity and similarity between pucBA-encoded polypeptide of R. sphaeroides and the pucBsAs-encoded polypeptide of Rdv. sulfidophilum were shown in Fig. 1 [6]; (3) the reaction center and both the core LHI and peripheral LHII complexes, are synthesized and assembled even under fully aerobic conditions in the dark [7, 8]; (4) the worse ordering was found in 2D crystal of Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII, LHII from both Rdv. sulfidophilum and R. sphaeroides is nonamer, but the better ordering was found in 2D crystal of R. sphaeroides LHII. Compared to the 2D crystals obtained from Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII, the rings in the 2D crystals from R. sphaeroides LHII are packed in a different and more compact way. Only a few β-subunits of a given ring appear to make direct contact to β-subunits of adjacent rings in the 2D crystals of Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII, while in the 2D crystal of R. sphaeroides LHII, eight out of nine β-subunits are involved in direct crystal contacts [9].
It was reported by Fowler et al. that LHII genes from Rubrivivax gelatinosus, Rhodopseudomonas (Rps.) palustris and Rps. acidophila were expressed in R. sphaeroides, one LHII gene from Rps. palustris are not functional in R. sphaeroides [10], and there is no evidence for energy transfer for the heterologous Rps. acidophila LHII complex in the spheroidenone background R. sphaeroides mutant DD13 [11], though they are similar in some physiological characteristics and light harvesting complexes structure.
Barbieri et al. [12] and Katsiou et al. [13] reported that the genes encoding light-harvesting complex II of Rdv. sulfidophilum were expressed in R. capsulatus, which was not concerned with their functions of energy transfer.
Therefore, we want to know whether the heterologous pucBsAs from different genera Rdv. sulfidophilum is expressed and the normal and functional LHII is assembled in R. sphaeroides? Whether energy transfer from the heterologous LHII of Rdv. sulfidophilum to the native LHI of R. sphaeroides is possible?
we undertook experiments to investigate the function of the expressed pucBsAs from Rdv. sulfidophilum in R. sphaeroides, the LHII structural genes (pucBsAs) from Rdv. sulfidophilum and the LHI structural genes (pufBA) from R. sphaeroides were amplified by PCR, and cloned into a LH expression vector, which was then introduced into LHI, LHII minus R. sphaeroides mutants; the resulting transconjugant strains synthesized LHI, LHII complexes which were examined by using RT-PCR, absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. The results in the present article suggest that the heterologous LHII has the normal function.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Rhodovulum sulfidophilum (wild type, Chinese Collection of Microorganisms, Beijing, China) was cultured in malate-yeast extract medium, with the addition of 0.5 M NaCl, at 32°C [12].
R. sphaeroides W1 (wild type, Chinese Collection of Microorganisms, Beijing, China). R. sphaeroides DD13 (genomic deletion of pucBAC, pufBALMX, insertion of SmR and KmR gene, Hunter) were grown aerobically or semiaerobically under the dark conditions in M22+ [14]. When required, antibiotics were added to M22+ at the final concentrations: streptomycin 20 μg ml−1, tetracycline 2 μg ml−1. Escherichia (E.) coli JM109 and S17-1 were grown in Luria–Bertani medium (LB) at 37°C, the final concentrations of antibiotics were tetracyclin 50 μg ml−1, ampicilin 100 μg ml−1 [15].
Bacterial strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used for PCR and RT-PCR were listed in Table 1.
The semiaerobic dark incubation was that the bacterium were grown in 500 ml conical flask filled with 70% volume culture at 34°C under 150 rpm.
Isolation of total chromosomal DNA from Rdv. sulfidophilum and R. sphaeroides
Cultures of R. sphaeroides W1 and Rdv. sulfidophilum from the logarithmic growth phase were centrifuged at 10,000 g, resuspended in urea buffer (42% urea (W/V), 0.3 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM EDTA, 1% N-Lauroylsarcosine (W/V), pH 8.0), mixed with 2 vol. of phenol saturated with Tris–HCl buffer and shaken during 2 h at room temperature. The aqueous fraction was collected, washed three times with phenol–chloroform 1:1 and then precipitated with 1 vol. isopropanol [16]. The precipitated DNA was dried, resuspended in bidistilled water and stored at −20°C.
Genes amplification and plasmids construction
The chromosomal DNAs of R. sphaeroides W1 and Rdv. sulfidophilum were for PCR amplification of genes pucBA, pufBA and pucBsAs, respectively.
The PCR amplification products were cloned into pMD18-T cloning vectors in strains E. coli JM109.
Standard procedures were used for plasmid isolation, restriction endonuclease digestion, ligation, and other molecular biological techniques [17]. Sequence analyses were performed with the DNAMAN (Lynnon Biosoft).
The mobilizable plasmids used in this study were based on pRKpucC (See Fig. 2). The plasmid pRKpucC (Tcr) is derived from pRK415 encompassing puc promoter and pucC of R. sphaeroides, which was used to express the pucBA of Rdv. sulfidophilum or R. sphaeroides and pufBA of R. sphaeroides.
The pucBA fragment (containing engineered SacI–BamHI ends) of R. sphaeroides was cloned into the SacI–BamHI site of pRKpucC to produce pRKpucBAC. The pucBsAs fragment gene pair (containing similarly engineered SacI-BamHI ends) of Rdv. sulfidophilum was cloned into the SacI–BamHI site of pRKpucC to produce pRKpucBsAsC. The pufBA fragments (containing engineered SacI–SacI ends) of R. sphaeroides were cloned into the SacI–SacI site of pRKpucBsAsC and pRKpucBAC to produce pRKpufBApucBsAsC and pRKpufBApucBAC, respectively, The insert orientation of pufBA fragments were screened by PCR using the screen primer and downstream primer of pufBA(pufBAR). The resulting constructions were confirmed through DNA sequencing by Shanghai Invitrogen Biotech Co Ltd
Conjugation techniques
The constructed plasmids were mobilized into strains R. sphaeroides DD13 with the mobilizing strain E. coli S17-1 by using the biparental conjugation system [11].
To select for transconjugant strains containing constructed plasmids, cells were grown aerobically in the dark on plates of medium M22+ supplemented with appropriate antibiotics: 2 μg ml−1 of tetracycline and 20 μg ml−1 of streptomycin.
Expression analysis of transconjugant strains
These strains with special plasmids were grown aerobically under the dark conditions in M22+ for 20 h, then were grown semiaerobically under the dark condition for 6 h, and collected. Total RNA was extracted with the RNA Isolation System (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were treated with DNase I (Promega) to remove contaminating genomic DNA, absence of genomic DNA contamination was checked by PCR amplification of RNA samples. The RNA samples were used for RT-PCR amplification assay with RT-PCR kit (Promega). The quantities of RT-PCR production from pucBsAs of Rdv. sulfidophilum and pucBA of R. sphaeroides were compared by ethidium–bromide-stained agarose gel electrophoresis.
Preparation of intracytoplasmic membranes
Following conjugative transfer, antibiotic-resistant colonies were further screened for the presence of light-harvesting complexes by absorbance spectroscopy.
Rhodobacter sphaeroides strains were grown under semiaerobic conditions in the dark at 34°C. Cultures were centrifuged, washed and resuspended in 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) containing 2.5 mM magnesium acetate and 1 mM phenyl methyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The cells were broken by disruption in a French pressure cell, followed by centrifugation at 2,000 g for 20 min. The intracytoplasmic membranes were purified by harvesting from the interface of sucrose step gradients (15%/40%, w/w) after centrifugation in a Beckman Ti45 rotor at 180,000g for 8 h [8].
Measurement of bacteriochlorophyll and LHII
BChl were extracted by a solution of acetone–methanol (7:2), the amount of BChl was determined by measuring the absorbance at 772 nm, using the extinction coefficient ε772 = 75 mM−1 cm−1 [16].
The amount of B800–850 could be measured at an optical density at 849 nm (OD849) to OD900 (ε = 96 ± 4 mM−1 cm−1) by using 3 mol of Bchl a per mol of complex. Then, the relative values of BChl contents per membrane protein and LHII contents per membrane protein in each sample were calculated [18].
Steady-state absorbance spectroscopy
The absorbance spectroscopy of transconjugant strains were scanned from 700 to 900 nm at room temperature on a Lambda-2 spectrometer (Perkin–Elmer), the control is DD13(pRK415).
Intracytoplasmic membranes were suspended in 10 mM MOPS, 50 mM KCl (pH 7.2). Absorbance spectra in the VIS/NIR spectral region at room temperature were recorded on a Lambda-2 spectrometer [10], the control is the intracytoplasmic membranes of DD13(pRK415).
Electron transfer measurement
Fluorescence emission spectra were measured at room temperature using the LS50B spectrofluorimeter(Perkin–Elmer). Intracytoplasmic membranes from semiaerobically grown cells were diluted to an absorbance of A680 1 cm = 0.05 in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0. The sample was excited with different wavelength and measure the fluorescence on spectrofluorimeter [19–22].
Results
Expression and absorbance spectroscopy of the transconjugant strains
The expressed transconjugant strains had the similar colors of the wild type strains of R. sphaeroides W1, which is purple brown, and DD13 is pink.
The transconjugant strains were experimented by RT-PCR amplification, the pucBsAs, pucBA and pufBA in the expression vectors were transcribed in R. sphaeroides DD13. The transcript levels were compared between pucBA and pucBsAs when RT-PCR was performed. We compared the quantity of RT-PCR production between pucBsAs of Rdv. sulfidophilum and pucBA of R. sphaeroides by ethidium–bromide-stained agarose gel electrophoresis, transcript level of pucBA was higher than transcript level of pucBsAs (data not shown).
The absorption spectrum of strain DD13(pRKpucBsAsC) showed peaks at 800 and 850 nm, typical of LHII of Rdv. sulfidophilum. It was similar to the spectrum of strain DD13(pRKpucBAC), which expresses LHII of R. sphaeroides. Likewise, the absorption spectrum of strain DD13(pRKpufBApucBsAsC) showed peaks typical of LHII of Rdv. sulfidophilum at 800 and 850 nm, with a small shoulder at 870 nm due to LHI of R. sphaeroides (data not shown). It was similar to the spectrum of strain DD13(pRKpufBApucBAC), which expresses both LHII and LHI of R. sphaeroides. These observations indicate that the LHII complex of Rdv. sulfidophilum retains its characteristics when expressed in the R. sphaeroides DD13 background (data not shown).
Absorbance spectroscopy and LHII amount of membranes
After strains spectroscopy analyzed, the membranes of strains were extracted for further membrane spectroscopy analyse. The room temperature absorbance spectra of membranes prepared from transconjugant strains are shown in Fig. 3.
The absorption spectrum of the membrane from DD13(pRKpucBsAsC) and DD13(pRKpuc-BAC) showed the typical LHII absorption peaks at 800 and 850 nm. Furthermore, the absorbance properties of the heterologously synthesized LHII complexes differed from those of R. sphaeroides LHII (λmax = 800, 850 nm). The LHII complex from the pucBsAs gene pair of Rdv. sulfidophilum showed absorbance peaks in the near infrared at 801 and 853 nm.
The spectra are scaled to reflect the level of LHII complex per amount of cellular membrane as quantified by total membrane protein, and it is clear that LHII arising from the gene pucBsAs is present at comparatively low level. The amounts of LHII complex of DD13(pRKpucBAC) and DD13(pRKpucBsAsC) were 26.5 and 18.3 nmol/mg of protein, respectively. The bacteriochlorophyll contents of membrane from DD13(pRKpucBAC) and DD13(pRKpucBsAsC) were 36.3 and 23.6 nmol Bchl/mg of protein, the bacteriochlorophyll pigments concentration of membrane from Rdv. sulfidophilum is much lower than which from R. sphaeroides, it is a stringent control of the level of bacteriochlorophyll to match the level of LHII complexes.
The membrane absorption spectrum of DD13 (pRKpufBApucBsAsC) shows the LHII absorption peaks (λmax = 801, 853 nm) of Rdv. sulfidophilum with a small LHI shoulder at the 870 nm of R. sphaeroides.
It is clear that the heterologously expressed LHII does not give rise to as much as LHII of R. sphaeroides in DD13.
Energy transfer within the LHII complexes
The value of the expression of Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII complexes depends on a demonstration that the complexes are still functional, which is that it can harvest and transfer light energy.
In order to measure the ability of the 800 nm absorbing pigments to transfer energy to the 850 nm pigments within the heterologously synthesized Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII complexes, excitation spectra in the near infrared region of the spectrum were measured. This technique measures the ability of the 800 nm absorbing pigments to transfer energy to the 850 nm pigments, from which fluorescence is detected at 900 nm.
The absorption and emission spectra suggest that the LHII complexes are able to transfer energy from their B800 to their B850 pigments. It can be seen that the 800 nm absorbing pigments within the Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII are able to elicit emission at 900 nm from the B850 band. The R. sphaeroides LHII is the same.
Figure 4 shows the near infra-red region of the fluorescence excitation spectra for membrane bound complexes from the LHII-only strains DD13(pRKpucBsAsC) and DD13(pRKpucBAC). It is showed that energy is efficiently transferred from the B800 to B850 pigments in the synthesized LHII complexes.
Energy transfer between the Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII complex and the R. sphaeroides LHI complex
The membranes used in this experiment were prepared from strain DD13(pRKpufBApucBsAsC) and DD13(pRKpufBApucBAC), the membrane of DD13(pRKpufBApucBsAsC) contains the Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII complex together with the R. sphaeroides LHI complex.
The ability of the peripheral LHII antenna to transfer energy to the LHI complex was monitored by exciting the LHII complex at various wavelengths, from 750 to 900 nm, while monitoring any fluorescence emitted from the LHI complex at 910 nm. Figure 5 shows the results of such an excitation experiment on membranes from strains containing the heterologous or native LHII and native R. sphaeroides LHI complexes. The excitation spectrum of DD13(pRKpufBApucBsAsC) is a thin solid line in Fig. 5; this profile is closely matched by the excitation spectrum of DD13(pRKpufBApucBAC) (bold line), which reflects that the Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII complex is able to transfer energy to the LHI complex of R. sphaeroides, like LHII complex of R. sphaeroides.
Discussion
Photochemical reaction, the primary important redox reactions occurs in photosynthetic bacteria, the LHII is the farthest outer component in the photosynthetic apparatus, which absorbs solar radiation to LHI.
Rhodovulum sulfidophilum and R. sphaeroides belong to two different genera, their physiological characters of light and oxygen and light harvesting complexes structure are dissimilar, and the pucAs of Rdv. sulfidophilum are evidently different from pucA encoded-apoprotein of R. sphaeroides in the polypeptide sequences, especially having dissimilar 12 amino acid residues in the transmembrane helices sequences, and LHII from Rdv. sulfidophilum is different from R. sphaeroides LHII in 2D crystal structure [9, 23–25].
Rhodovulum sulfidophilum differs from the R. sphaeroides by its missing influence of oxygen tension on the rate of synthesis of the photosynthetic apparatus, and its LHII synthesis and assembly is different from the latter. Through the biochemical, spectroscopic and functional information, we believe that the pucBsAs of Rdv. sulfidophilum is normally expressed in R. sphaeroides, and the LHII is functional in it, which can availably transfer energy in itself and to the LHI of R. sphaeroides.
These transconjugant strains have their typical absorbance spectroscopy characters. The results indicate that the pucBsAs of Rdv. sulfidophilum and pufBA of R. sphaeroides can be expressed at the same time in the R. sphaeroides background strain DD13, and have their normal functions. Within the heterologously expressed Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII in R. sphaeroides, energy can be transferred from B800 to B850, likewise, energy can be transferred from Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII to R. sphaeroides LHI.
The membrane absorption spectrum of DD13(pRKpufBApucBsAsC) shows the LHII absorption peaks at 800 and 850 nm of Rdv. sulfidophilum with a small LHI shoulder at the 870 nm. However the absorbance properties of the heterologously synthesized LHII complexes in DD13 differed from which of R. sphaeroides LHII in R. sphaeroides (λ max = 800, 850 nm), the LHII complex from the pucBsAs gene pair of Rdv. sulfidophilum showed absorbance peaks in the near infrared at 801 and 853 nm, but the Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII shows the absorption peaks at 801 and 850 nm in Rdv. sulfidophilum [6, 26]. The red shifts of absorbance of Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII in R. sphaeroides are possibly for the different pigment background of R. sphaeroides [3, 8].
Furthermore, absorbance spectra, bacteriochlorophyll contents and LHII complex contents of the membrane samples clearly showed that the levels of spectral properties and assembly of the LHII complex from Rdv. sulfidophilum are lower than which from R. sphaeroides in DD13. The possible reason is that pucBsAs gene pair of Rdv. sulfidophilum were expressed under the different cell conditions which influenced their transcription, translation and assembly.
It should be noted that the pucAs used in this study is the actual processed mature sequence of mature α-subunit of Rdv. sulfidophilum LHII, not withstanding its limitation, this study does suggest investigating the expression characters of unprocessed DNA sequence which encodes the amino acid sequence of whole ORF of Rdv. sulfidophilum pucA in R. sphaeroides in nature.
The experiment data are helpful to expressing functional membrane proteins from further evolutionary relationship and different physiological species in this system.
Abbreviations
- LHII:
-
Light-harvesting II
- LHI:
-
Light-harvesting I
- RC:
-
Reaction center
- LB:
-
Luria–Bertani medium
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- RT-PCR:
-
Reverse transcription-PCR
- PMSF:
-
Phenyl methyl sulfonyl fluoride
- EDTA:
-
Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid
- LDAO:
-
Lauryl N, N-dimethylamine-N-oxide
References
Bahatyrova S, Frese RN, Siebert CA, Olsen JD, van der Werf KO, van Grondelle R, Niederman RA, Bullough PA, Otto C, Hunter CN (2004) The native architecture of a photosynthetic membrane. Nature 430:1058–1062. doi:10.1038/nature02823
Gall A, Cogdell RJ, Robert B (2003) Influence of carotenoid molecules on the structure of the bacteriochlorophyll binding site in peripheral light-harvesting proteins from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry 42:7252–7258. doi:10.1021/bi0268293
Fowler GJS, Visschers RW, Grief GG, van Grondelle R, Hunter CN (1992) Genetically modified photosynthetic antenna complexes with blueshifted absorbance bands. Nature 355:848–850. doi:10.1038/355848a0
He Z, Sundström V, Pullerits T (2001) Intermolecular hydrogen bonding between carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll in LH2. FEBS Lett 496:36–39. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02400-0
Appia-Ayme C, Little PJ, Matsumoto Y, Leech AP, Berks BC (2001) Cytochrome complex essential for photosynthetic oxidation of both thiosulfate and sulfide in Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. J Bacteriol 183:6107–6118. doi:10.1128/JB.183.20.6107-6118.2001
Tadros MH, Hagemann GE, Katsiou E, Dierstein R, Schiltz E (1995) Isolation and complete amino acid sequence of the beta- and alpha-polypeptides from the peripheral light-harvesting pigment-protein complex II of Rhodobacter sulfidophilum. FEBS Lett 368:243–247. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(95)00645-P
Lee JK, Kiley PJ, Kaplan S (1989) Posttranscriptional control of puc operon expression of B800–850 light-harvesting complex formation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol 171:3391–3405
Masuda S, Nagashima KVP, Shimada K, Matsuura K (2000) Transcriptional control of expression of genes for photosynthetic reaction center and light-harvesting proteins in the purple bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. J Bacteriol 182:2778–2786. doi:10.1128/JB.182.10.2778-2786.2000
Walz T, Jamieson SJ, Bowers CM, Bullough PA, Hunter CN (1998) Projection structures of three photosynthetic complexes from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: LH2 at 6 A, LH1 and RC-LH1 at 25 A. J Mol Biol 282:833–845. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2050
Fowler GJS, Hunter CN (1996) The synthesis and assembly of functional high and low light LH2 antenna complexes from Rhodopseudomonas palustris in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Biol Chem 271:13356–13361. doi:10.1074/jbc.271.23.13356
Fowler GJS, Gardiner AT, Mackenzie RC, Barratt SJ, Simmons AE, Westerhuis WH, Cogdell RJ, Hunter CN (1995) Heterologous expression of genes encoding bacterial light-harvesting complexes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Biol Chem 270:23875–23882. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.40.23875
Barbieri MR, Kerber NL, Pucheu NL, Tadros MH, García AF (2002) Effect of light and oxygen and adaptation to changing light conditions in a photosynthetic mutant in which the LHII complex of Rhv. sulfidophilum was heterologously expressed in a strain of Rb. capsulatus whose puc operon was deleted. Curr Microbiol 45:209–216. doi:10.1007/s00284-001-0104-7
Katsiou E, Sturgis JN, Robert B, Tadros MH (1998) Heterologous expression of genes encoding bacterial light-harvesting complex II in Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. Microbiol Res 153:189–204
Hunter CN, Turner G (1988) Transfer of genes coding for apoproteins of reaction centre and light-harvesting LH1 complexes to Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Gen Microbiol 134:1471–1480
Zeng X, Choudhary M, Kaplan S (2003) A second and unusual pucBA operon of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: genetics and function of the encoded polypeptides. J Bacteriol 185:6171–6184. doi:10.1128/JB.185.20.6171-6184.2003
Raiger Iustman LJ, Kerber NL, Pucheu NL, Bornmann MJ, Kohler S, Labahn A, Tadros M, Drews G, Augusto FG (2006) Characterization of a mutant strain of Rhodovulum sulfidophilum lacking the pufA and pufB genes encoding the polypeptides for the light-harvesting complex I. Arch Microbiol 185:407–415. doi:10.1007/s00203-006-0108-6
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor
Meinhardt SW, Kiley PJ, Kaplan S, Crofts AR, Harayama S (1985) Characterization of light-harvesting mutants of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides I. Measurement of the efficiency of energy transfer from light harvesting complexes to the reaction center. Arch Biochem Biophys 236:130–139. doi:10.1016/0003-9861(85)90612-5
Schubert A, Stenstam A, Beenken WJD, Herek JL, Cogdell R, Pullerits T, Sundström V (2004) In vitro self-assembly of the light harvesting pigment-protein LH2 revealed by ultrafast spectroscopy and electron microscopy. Biophys J 86:2363–2373
Polívka T, Zigmantas D, Herek JL, He Z, Pascher T, Pullerits T, Cogdell RJ, Frank HA, Sundström V (2002) The carotenoid S-1 state in LH2 complexes from purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodopseudomonas acidophila: S-1 energies, dynamics, and carotenoid radical formation. J Phys Chem B 106:11016–11025. doi:10.1021/jp025752p
Yoshida M, Masuda S, Nagashima KVP, Shimada AVK, Matsuura K (2001) In vitro and in vivo electron transfer to the triheme cytochrome subunit bound to the photosynthetic reaction center complex in the purple bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1506:23–30. doi:10.1016/S0005-2728(01)00177-3
Herek JL, Fraser NJ, Pullerits T, Martinsson P, Polívka T, Scheer H, Cogdell RJ, Sundström V (2000) B800 -> B850 energy transfer mechanism in bacterial LH2 complexes investigated by B800 pigment exchange. Biophys J 78:2590–2596
Savage H, Cyrklaff M, Montoya G, Kühlbrandt W, Sinning I (1996) Two-dimensional structure of light harvesting complex II (LHII) from the purple bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum and comparison with LHII from Rhodopseudomonas acidophila. Structure 15:243–252. doi:10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00029-9
Raiger Iustman LJ, Pucheu NL, Kerber NL, Vandekerckhove J, Tadros MH, Garcia AF (2001) Phosphorylation of LHI β during membrane synthesis in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. Curr Microbiol 42:323–329. doi:10.1007/s002840010224
Montoya G, Cyrklaff M, Sinning I (1995) Two dimensional crystallization and preliminary structure analysis of light harvesting II (B800–850) complex from the purple bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. J Mol Biol 250:1–10. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1995.0353
Hagemann GE, Katsiou E, Forkl H, Steindorf ACJ, Tadros MH (1997) Gene cloning and regulation of gene expression of the puc operon from Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1351:341–358
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Program “863” of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (NO:2006AA02Z138) and Natural Science Foundation of the Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (NO: CSTC,2006BA5006). We appreciate C. Neil Hunter for offering the strain DD13, and also acknowledge the intellectual support of my colleagues in our laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Hu, Z., Chen, X. et al. Heterologous synthesis and assembly of functional LHII antenna complexes from Rhodovulum sulfidophilum in Rhodobacter sphaeroides mutant. Mol Biol Rep 36, 1695–1702 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-008-9370-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-008-9370-9