Molecular Breeding

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 269–276 | Cite as

A survey of cultivated heirloom tomato varieties identifies four new mutant alleles at the green-flesh locus

  • Cornelius S. Barry
  • Priyanka Pandey


The process of crop domestication occurs through the selection and subsequent propagation of novel alleles that improve traits of interest. Cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), particularly heirloom varieties, exhibit a wide range of variation in fruit size, shape and color. The green-flesh mutant of tomato possesses a stay-green phenotype resulting in fruits that ripen to a red-brown color, due to the retention of chlorophyll and the simultaneous accumulation of lycopene. The recent identification of the GREEN-FLESH gene provides a molecular tool with which to investigate the origin of a subset of cultivated tomato varieties that resemble the green-flesh mutant. Sequence analysis of the GF locus from 26 varieties revealed the existence of four previously unidentified null alleles. This study illustrates the potential of cultivated tomato varieties, including heritage cultivars, heirlooms, and land races, for uncovering new alleles in genes of interest.


Heirloom tomato Fruit color Chlorophyll degradation Stay-green mutant Genotyping Fruit quality 



This research was supported through start-up funds from Michigan State University and the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station to C.B.


  1. Akhtar MS, Goldschmidt EE, John I, Rodoni S, Matile P, Grierson D (1999) Altered patterns of senescence and ripening in gf, a stay-green mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J Exp Bot 50:1115–1122. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/50.336.1115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstead I, Donnison I, Aubry S, Harper J, Hortensteiner S, James C, Mani J, Moffet M, Ougham H, Roberts L, Thomas A, Weeden N, Thomas H, King I (2006) From crop to model to crop: identifying the genetic basis of the staygreen mutation in the Lolium/Festuca forage and amenity grasses. New Phytol 172:592–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01922.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstead I, Donnison I, Aubry S, Harper J, Hortensteiner S, James C, Mani J, Moffet M, Ougham H, Roberts L, Thomas A, Weeden N, Thomas H, King I (2007) Cross-species identification of Mendel’s/locus. Science 315:73. doi: 10.1126/science.1132912 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry CS, McQuinn RP, Thompson AJ, Seymour GB, Grierson D, Giovannoni JJ (2005) Ethylene insensitivity conferred by the Green-ripe and Never-ripe 2 ripening mutants of tomato. Plant Physiol 138:267–275. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.057745 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry CS, McQuinn RP, Chung M-Y, Besuden A, Giovannoni JJ (2008) Amino acid substitutions in homologs of the STAY-GREEN protein are responsible for the green-flesh and chlorophyll retainer mutations of tomato and pepper. Plant Physiol 147:179–187. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.118430 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borovsky Y, Paran I (2008) Chlorophyll breakdown during pepper fruit ripening in the chlorophyll retainer mutation is impaired at the homolog of the senescence-inducible stay-green gene. Theor Appl Genet 117:235–240. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0768-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheung A-Y, McNellis T, Piekos B (1993) Maintenance of chloroplast components during chromoplast differentiation in the tomato mutant green flesh. Plant Physiol 101:1223–1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Darby LA (1978) Isogenic lines of tomato fruit color mutants. Hortic Res 18:73–84Google Scholar
  9. Kerr EA (1956) Green flesh, gf. Rpt Tomato Genet Coop 6:17Google Scholar
  10. Konieczny A, Ausubel FM (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using codominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J 4:403–410. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020403.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Male CJ (1999) 100 heirloom tomatoes for the American garden. Workman Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Paran I, van der Knaap E (2007) Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J Exp Bot 58:3841–3852. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm257 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Park SY, Yu JW, Park JS, Li J, Yoo SC, Lee NY, Lee SK, Jeong SW, Seo HS, Koh HJ, Jeon JS, Park YI, Paek NC (2007) The senescence-induced staygreen protein regulates chlorophyll degradation. Plant Cell 19:1649–1664. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044891 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ren GD, An K, Liao Y, Zhou X, Cao YJ, Zhao HF, Ge XC, Kuai BK (2007) Identification of a novel chloroplast protein AtNYE1 regulating chlorophyll degradation during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 144:1429–1441. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.100172 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sato Y, Morita R, Nishimura M, Yamaguchi H, Kusaba M (2007) Mendel’s green cotyledon gene encodes a positive regulator of the chlorophyll-degrading pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14169–14174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705521104 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HorticultureMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations