What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance
- 1.1k Downloads
Two studies tested how the effects of a utility value manipulation on interest and performance were moderated by expectations for success. College students learned a new technique for mentally solving multiplication problems with instructions containing task utility information or not. In Study 1 (N = 62), the effect of the utility value information was positive for individuals with high success expectancies, but negative for individuals with low success expectancies. Study 2 (N = 148) examined the causal role of success expectancies by manipulating whether participants received an expectancy boost before receiving the utility manipulation. The results showed further support for the importance of success expectancies in moderating the effect of directly-communicated utility value. The results are discussed in relation to other research on utility value, interest, and expectancy–value models of achievement behavior.
KeywordsInterest Utility value Task value Success expectancies Perceived competence
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Award # R305B090009. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the U.S. Department of Education.
- Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, J. W. (1974). The mainsprings of achievement-oriented activity. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 13–41). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (1974). Motivation and achievement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Durik, A. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (in press). One size fits some: Instructional enhancements to promote interest don’t work the same for everyone. In K. A. Renninger & M. Nieswandt (Eds.), Interest, the self, and K-16 mathematics and science learning. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in achievement patterns. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender (pp. 97–132). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 43. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435530.
- Harackiewicz, J. M., & Sansone, C. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 7, 21–49.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Parents, task values, and real-life achievement-related choices. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 405–439). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krapp, A. (2000). Interest and human development during adolescence: An educational–psychological approach. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 109–128). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Lens, W., Simons, J., & Dewitte, S. (2001). Student motivation and self-regulation as a function of future time perspective and perceived instrumentality. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 233–248). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., et al. (2010). Situational Interest Survey (SIS): An instrument to assess the role of situational factors in interest development. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 647–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M., Hau, K.-T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “X” out of expectancy–value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22, 1058–1066. doi: 10.1177/0956797611415540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renninger, K. A. (1990). Children’s play interests, representation, and activity. In R. Fivush & K. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 127–165). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373–404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
- Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1037/a0027470.
- Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar