Simple geometric shapes are implicitly associated with affective value
- 842 Downloads
Growing evidence suggests that the underlying geometry of a visual image is an effective mechanism for conveying the affective meaning of a scene or object. Indeed, even very simple context-free geometric shapes have been shown to signal emotion. Specifically, downward-pointing V’s are perceived as threatening and curvilinear forms are perceived as pleasant. As these shapes are thought to be primitive cues for decoding emotion, we sought to assess whether they are evaluated as affective even without extended cognitive processing. Using an Implicit Association Test to examine associations between three shapes (downward- and upward-pointing triangles, circles) and pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral scenes, in two studies we found that participants were faster to categorize downward-pointing triangles as unpleasant compared to neutral or pleasant. These findings were specific to downward-pointing shapes containing an acute angle. The present findings support the hypothesis that simple geometric forms convey emotion and that this perception does not require explicit judgment.
KeywordsEmotion perception Implicit cognition IAT Threat
We wish to thank Molly Barton, and Lorri Kais for their assistance. All authors affiliated with the Department of Psychology. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Christine L. Larson, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Department of Psychology, 2441 E. Hartford Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211. Electronic mail may be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Center for the Study of Emotion, Attention [CSEA-NIMH]. (1999). The international affective picture system: Digitized photographs. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. (1872/1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1973). Universal facial expressions in emotion. Studia Psychologica, 15, 140–147.Google Scholar
- Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4–27.Google Scholar
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system: Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
- LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung [The innate forms of potential experience]. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 5, 233–519.Google Scholar
- Öhman, A. E., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Science, 108, 438–522.Google Scholar
- Stanley, D., Phelps, E., & Banaji, M. (2008). The neural basis of implicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17, 164–170.Google Scholar
- Trut, L. (2005). Early canid domestication: The farm-fox experiment. In P. W. Sherman & J. Alcock (Eds.), Exploring animal behavior: Readings from the American Scientist (4th ed., pp. 181–190). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
- Watson, D. G., Blagrove, E., Evans, C., & Moore, L. (2011). Negative triangles: Simple geometric shapes convey emotional valence. Emotion. doi: 10.1037/a0024495.
- Watson, D. G., Blagrove, E., & Selwood, S. (in press). Emotional triangles: A test of emotion-based attentional capture by simple geometric shapes. Cognition and Emotion. Google Scholar
- Witterbrink, B., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (2007). Implicit measures of attitudes. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading faces. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar