Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, 33:387 | Cite as

Personality trait scores among occupationally active bullied persons and witnesses to bullying

  • Roger Persson
  • Annie Hogh
  • Åse-Marie Hansen
  • Catarina Nordander
  • Kerstina Ohlsson
  • Istvan Balogh
  • Kai Österberg
  • Palle Ørbæk
Original Paper

Abstract

There is little research on the personalities and emotional stability of persons who report being bullied or witnessing bullying at work. Men and women (N = 247) from 19 to 64 years of age and in manual labour completed a questionnaire concerning the psychosocial work climate, bullying and personality. Three groups were defined: bullied (N = 14), witnesses (N = 31) and non-bullied respondents (N = 202). The Swedish universities Scale of Personality was used to assess personality traits related to the three major dimensions of neuroticism, extraversion, and aggressiveness. Bullied persons had higher scores on all six scales within the neuroticism dimension as well as higher irritability (aggressiveness dimension) and impulsiveness scores (extraversion dimension), when compared with their non-bullied work colleagues. To conclude, bullied persons display a self-image that is dominated by mistrust and embitterment as well as irritability and impulsiveness. Accordingly, when dealing with bullying at work, the need for ego-supportive actions should be considered in conjunction with more organisational, collective oriented action.

Keywords

Aggressiveness Anxiety Extraversion Harassment Job content questionnaire Work environment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council, the Swedish Council for Work Life and Social Research, AFA insurance, the Medical Faculty of Lund University, and the County Councils of Southern Sweden. Ms. Lothy Granquist and Ms. Anita Ohlsson, are acknowledged for their efforts in collecting data and other assistance. Secretary Bodil Holst and senior researcher Bryan Cleal provided instructive lingual remarks. The cooperation of participants is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias. A cognitive perspective. USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight—developmental-trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<117::AID-AB2480180205>3.0.CO;2-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hjeltback, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173–184. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:3<173::AID-AB2480200304>3.0.CO;2-D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, M. J., Julious, S. A., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 311, 1145–1148.Google Scholar
  5. Chandola, T., Martikainen, P., Bartley, M., Lahelma, E., Marmot, M., Michikazu, S., et al. (2004). Does conflict between home and work explain the effect of multiple roles on mental health? A comparative study of Finland, Japan, and the UK. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 884–893. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 335–349. doi: 10.1080/135943200417957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coyne, I., Smith-Lee Chong, P., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2003). Self and peer nominations of bullying: An analysis of incident rates, individual differences, and perceptions of the working environment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 209–228. doi: 10.1080/13594320344000101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dallner, M., Lindström, K., Elo, A.-L., Skogstad, A., Gamberale, F., & Hottinen, V. (2000). Användarmanual för QPS nordic: Frågeformulär om psykologiska och sociala faktorer i arbetslivet utprovat i Danmark, Finland, Norge och Sverige. [User’s manual for the QPS Nordic: Questionnaire on psychological and social factors in the working life evaluated in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.] Stockholm: Arbetslivsrapport från Arbetslivsinstitutet, 2000, 19.Google Scholar
  9. Djurkovic, N., McCormack, D., & Casimir, G. (2005). Neuroticism and the psychosomatic model of workplace bullying. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 73–88. doi: 10.1108/02683940610643224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 379–401. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00043-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., Matthiesen, S. B., & Hellesoy, O. H. (1990). Mobbism in the workplace—incidence, manifestations, consequences. Nordisk Psykologi, 42, 294–298.Google Scholar
  12. Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., Matthiesen, S. B., & Hellesoy, O. H. (1996). Bullying at work and its relationships with health complaints—moderating effects of social support and personality. Nordisk Psykologi, 48, 116–137.Google Scholar
  13. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gandolfo, R. (1995). Mmpi-2 profiles of workers compensation claimants who present with complaints of harassment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 711–715. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5<711::AID-JCLP2270510517>3.0.CO;2-R.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Girardi, P., Monaco, E., Prestigiacomo, C., Talamo, A., Ruberto, A., & Tatarelli, R. (2007). Personality and psychopathological profiles in individuals exposed to mobbing. Violence and Victims, 22, 172–188. doi: 10.1891/088667007780477320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Glasø, L., Matthiesen, S. B., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 313–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00554.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). User’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Oxford: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  18. Gustavsson, J. P., Bergman, H., Edman, G., Ekselius, L., von Knorring, L., & Linder, J. (2000). Swedish universities scales of personality (SSP): Construction, internal consistency and normative data. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 217–225. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.102003217.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen, A. M., Hogh, A., Persson, R., Karlson, B., Garde, A. H., & Orbaek, P. (2006). Bullying at work, health outcomes, and physiological stress response. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60, 63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study. Work and Stress, 21, 220–242. doi: 10.1080/02678370701705810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The job content questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 322–355. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2001). MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 467–484. doi: 10.1080/13594320143000753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints: The role of state negative affectivity and generalized self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 397–405. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Munoz, A., Moreno, Y., & Garrosa, E. (2007). The moderating role of assertiveness and social anxiety in workplace bullying: Two empirical studies. Psychology in Spain, 11, 85–94.Google Scholar
  25. Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nordander, C., Ohlsson, K., Balogh, I., Hansson, G. A., Axmon, A., Persson, R., et al. (2007). Gender differences in workers with identical repetitive industrial tasks: Exposure and musculoskeletal disorders. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 81, 939–947. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0286-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Parkins, I. S., Fishbein, H. D., & Ritchey, P. N. (2006). The influence of personality on workplace bullying and discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2554–2577. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00117.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Persson, R. (2002). Trait anxiety as a determinant of psychological test results. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
  29. Rammsayer, T., Stahl, J., & Schmiga, K. (2006). Basic personality dimensions and stress-related coping strategies in victims of workplace bullying. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 5, 41–52. doi: 10.1026/1617-6391.5.2.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roland, E. (2002). Aggression, depression, and bullying others. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 198–206. doi: 10.1002/ab.90022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schalling, D., Asberg, M., Edman, G., & Oreland, L. (1987). Markers for vulnerability to psychopathology—temperament traits associated with platelet mao activity. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 76, 172–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb02881.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Seigne, E., Coyne, I., Randall, P., & Parker, J. (2007). Personality traits of bullies as a contributory factor in workplace bullying: An exploratory study. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 10, 118–132.Google Scholar
  33. Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Persson
    • 1
  • Annie Hogh
    • 2
  • Åse-Marie Hansen
    • 1
  • Catarina Nordander
    • 3
  • Kerstina Ohlsson
    • 3
  • Istvan Balogh
    • 3
  • Kai Österberg
    • 3
  • Palle Ørbæk
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Centre for the Working EnvironmentCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Division of Occupational and Environmental MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations