Brainstorming rules as assigned goals: Does brainstorming really improve idea quantity?
- 785 Downloads
In two experiments (n = 264 and 339), I treat brainstorming rules as assigned goals and compare their effectiveness to that of quantity goals as interventions to improve the number of ideas generated by individuals. Controlling for goal commitment, I find that brainstorming rules alone do not convey an advantage over even a vague quantity goal presented alone for enhancing the number of ideas generated in two common tasks. Detailed contrasts revealed that specific, difficult goals were only partially effective on their own, as expected when goal commitment is moderate. However, I find evidence in both studies that brainstorming rules are useful adjuncts to specific, difficult quantity goals. Importantly, their combination was the only consistently effective improvement over both vague quantity goals and brainstorming rules presented alone. I discuss implications for future research adopting a goal-based view of intervention in idea generation.
KeywordsBrainstorming Goals Idea generation Creativity
I thank associate editor Mark Muraven and the anonymous reviewers for their many helpful comments. I thank Angela Henderson for data coding. An earlier version of Study 1 was presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Academy of Management.
- Aiken, L. A., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER. Bonn: Bonn University Dept. of Psychology.Google Scholar
- Hyams, N. B., & Graham, W. K. (1984). Effects of goal setting and initiative on individual brainstorming. The Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 283–284.Google Scholar
- Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753–772. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Litchfield, R. C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal-based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649–668.Google Scholar
- Locke, E. A. (1966). The relationship of intentions to level of performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 50–66.Google Scholar
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal-setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
- Parnes, S. J. (1963). The deferment-of-judgment principle: A clarification of the literature. Psychological Reports, 12, 521–522.Google Scholar
- Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar