Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 296–309 | Cite as

Goal orientation profiles and task performance growth trajectories

  • Gillian B. Yeo
  • Tamma Sorbello
  • Annette Koy
  • Luke D. Smillie
Original Paper

Abstract

Goal orientation theories were used to generate predictions regarding the moderating effect of goal orientation profiles on task performance growth trajectories. Participants were given multiple trials of practice on an air traffic control task. Analyses were conducted using growth curve modeling. As expected, individuals with high performance-approach orientation improved their task performance scores faster than their counterparts. The interaction between mastery and performance-avoid orientations moderated the performance growth curve such that individuals with high mastery and low performance-avoid orientation improved their performance at the fastest rate. The interaction between performance-approach and performance-avoid orientations also moderated the performance growth curve. Individuals with low performance-approach and high performance-avoid orientation improved their performance at the slowest rate. These findings contribute to theory and practice by elucidating how various combinations of goal orientations influence the rate of skill acquisition.

Keywords

Goal orientation Task performance Growth trajectories 

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L., Kanfer, R., & Goff, M. (1995). Cognitive and noncognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(4), 270–304. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.1.4.270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (1994). Achievement goals as a measure of motivation in university students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 430–446. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: A multiple goals approach. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 229–254). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706–722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance and knowledge. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 497–505. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317–329.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, K. G. (2001). Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology, 54, 271–296. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26–48. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Church, M. A., Elliot, A., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43–54. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249–253. doi:10.1177/014662168300700301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cury, F., Elliot, A., Sarrazin, P., Da Fonesca, D., & Rufo, M. (2002). The trichotomous achievement goal model and intrinsic motivation: A sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 473–481. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00017-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1096–1127. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. The American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliot, A. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 10, 143–179.Google Scholar
  19. Elliot, A., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628–644. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliot, A., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. L. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(3), 549–563. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliot, A., Shell, M., Bouas Henry, K., & Maier, M. (2005). Achievement goals, performance contingencies, and performance attainment: An experimental test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 630–640. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliot, A., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 139–156. doi:10.1023/A:1009057102306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, R., & Yates, F. (1974). Statistical tables for biological agricultural and medical research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, S., & Ford, K. J. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51, 397–420. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00731.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ford, J. K., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. (1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 218–233. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1284–1295. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002a). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–345. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. (2002b). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562–575. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Helmreich, R. L., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W., & Spence, J. T. (1978). Achievement motivation and scientific attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 222–226. doi:10.1177/014616727800400209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Highhouse, S. (in press). Designing experiments that generalize. Organizational Research Methods. doi:10.1177/1094428107300396.
  35. Hofmann, D. A., & Strickland, O. J. (1995). Task performance and satisfaction: Evidence for a task- by ego-orientation interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 495–511. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01764.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horvath, M., Herleman, H., & McKie, R. L. (2006). Goal orientation, task difficulty and task interest: An HLM analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 169–176. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9029-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Horvath, M., Scheu, C., & DeShon, R. (2001). Goal orientation: Integrating theory and measurement. In R. P. C. DeShon (Ed.), New directions in goal orientation: Exploring the construct and its measurement. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  38. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 74(4), 657–690. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect and cognition. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Loft, S., Hill, A., Neal, A., Humphreys, M., & Yeo, G. (2004). ATC-lab: An air traffic control simulator for the laboratory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 331–338.Google Scholar
  41. Mangos, P. M., & Steele-Johnson, D. (2001). The role of subjective task complexity in goal orientation, self-efficacy, and performance relations. Human Performance, 14(2), 169–186. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1402_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martocchio, J. J. (1994). Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy and learning in training. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 819–825. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.819.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 381–395. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meece, J., & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 582–590. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nicholls, J. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nicholls, J., Cheung, P., Lauer, J., & Patashnick, M. (1989). Individual differences in academic motivation: Perceived ability, goals, beliefs and values. Learning and Individual Differences, 1(1), 63–84. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(89)90010-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Payne, S. C., Satoris, S. Y., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128–150. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zieder (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pintrich, P. R., Conley, A. M., & Kempler, T. M. (2003). Current issues in achievement goal theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 319–337. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ployhart, R. E., Holtz, B. C., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). Longitudinal data analysis: Applications of random coefficient modeling to leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 455–486. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00122-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Radosevich, D. J., Vaidyanathan, V. T., Yeo, S., & Radosevich, D. M. (2004). Relating goal orientation to self-regulatory processes: A longitudinal field test. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 207–229. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00032-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmidt, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 405–429. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00156.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schraw, G., Horn, C., Thorndike-Christ, T., & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal orientations and student classroom achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 359–368. doi:10.1006/ceps.1995.1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seijts, G., Latham, G., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227–239.Google Scholar
  56. Smillie, L. D., Yeo, G., Furnham, A., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). Benefits of all work and no play: The relationship between neuroticism and performance as a function of resource allocation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 131–155. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 8–74). San Francisco: WH Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  59. Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P. B., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 724–738. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tabernero, C., & Wood, R. (1999). Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in self-regulation and performance on a complex task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(2), 104–127. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vandewalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995–1015. doi:10.1177/0013164497057006009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veroff, J. (1969). Social comparisons and the development of achievement motivation. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children (pp. 46–101). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social and academic goals at school: Motivation and achievement in context. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407–415. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between effort and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness and goal orientation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 231–247. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2006). An examination of the dynamic relationship between self-efficacy and performance across levels of analysis and levels of specificity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1088–1101. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2008). Subjective cognitive effort: A model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 617–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zickar, M. J., & Slaughter, J. E. (1999). Examining creative performance over time using HLM: An illustration using film directors. Human Performance, 12(3–4), 211–230. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1203&4_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Coppola, B. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081–1094. doi:10.1080/0950069032000052207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gillian B. Yeo
    • 1
  • Tamma Sorbello
    • 1
  • Annette Koy
    • 1
  • Luke D. Smillie
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.GoldsmithsUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations