Advertisement

Mechanics of Composite Materials

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 619–628 | Cite as

Physical and mechanical properties of composites based on a linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and natural fiber waste

  • O. Nestore
  • J. Kajaks
  • I. Vancovicha
  • S. Reihmane
Article

The influence of the content and fiber length of textile waste (cotton, flax, and hemp) on the deformation and strength properties (in tension and bending) of a linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) was investigated. It was found that the tensile strength increased for all composites containing hemp fibers of up to 30 wt.%. The elongation at break rapidly decreased when the filler content was raised to 10 wt.%, but thereafter changed insignificantly. The flexural strength and modulus increased considerably with filler content in the composites. On the contrary, their deformability, as expected, decreased. The influence of hemp fibers on the physicalmechanical properties of the LLDPE was somewhat more pronounced. The optimum content of fibers in the composites (30 wt.%) was significantly smaller than that usually obtained (40-50 wt.% natural fibers) for other polyolefin composites, for example, with low-density polyethylene and polypropylene matrices. The highest values of strength parameters, both in tension and bending, were reached for systems with a fiber length of up to 1 mm. The melt flow index decreased considerably with increasing fiber content in the LLDPE matrix (from 4.4 dg/min for LLDPE to 0.05-0.14 dg/min for systems containing 30 wt.% fibers). Nevertheless, processing of the composites was possible by traditional methods, for example, extrusion.

Keywords

linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) natural fiber waste composites mechanical properties fluidity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the European Social Fund within the framework of the project “Establishment of interdisciplinary research groups for new functional properties of smart textiles development and integrating in innovative products” (ESF Nr.2009/0198/1DP/1.1.1.2.0./09/APIA/VIAA/148).

References

  1. 1.
    R. M. Rowell, “A new generation of composite materials from agro-based fiber,” in: P. N. Prasad, I. E. Mark, and T. J. Fai (eds.), Polymer and Other Advanced Materials: Emerging Technologies and Business Opportunities, Plenum Press (1995), pp. 659-665.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. R. Sanadi, D. F. Caulfield, and R. E. Jacobcon, “Agro-fiber thermoplastic components,” in: Paper and Composites From Agro-Based Resources, Lewis Publ. (1997), pp. 377-401.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Shinoj, R. Visvanathan, and S. Panigrahi, “Towards industrial utilization of oil palm fiber: Physical and dielectric characterization of linear low-density polyethylene composites and comparison with other fiber sources,” Biosyst. Eng., 106, No. 4, 378-388 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Panigrahi, X. Li, L. Tabil, K. Barghout, R. L. Kushwaha, and E. K. Mupoudwa, “Development of flax-fiber-reinforced biocomposites for potential application for automotive industries,” SAE Int. J. Commerc. Vehicl., 2, No. 2, 107-114 (2010).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Panigrahi, “Oil palm fiber biocomposites for automotive industries,” SAE Int. J. Commerc. Vehicl., 3, No. 1, 313-322 (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Pasuinini, E. M. Teixeira, A. A. Curvelo, et al., “Surface esterification of cellulose fibers: processing and characterization of low-density polyethylene/cellulose fibers composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 68, No. 1, 193-201 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ya. A. Kayaks, B. N. Bulmanis, S. A. Reikhmane, and M. G. Tsiprin, “Effect of the composition and concentration of fibrous wastes from linen yarn production on the physicomechanical properties of polyolefin composites,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 33, No. 3, 293-298 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Kayaks, V. N. Bulmanis, S. A. Reikhmane, and M. G. Tsiprin, “Effect of modifying additions on the physicomechanical properties of composites based on polyethylene and wastes from linen yarn production,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 33, No. 4, 381-385 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. A. Kajaks, S. A. Reihmane, and M. G. Tsiprin, “Physicomechanical properties of composites from recycled polyethylene and linen yarn production wastes,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 35, No. 2, 139-146 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. A. Kajaks, S. A. Reihmane, V. N. Bulmanis, and J. E. Lejnieks, “Effect of water on the physicomechanical properties of composites containing low-density polyethylene and linen yarn production waste,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 37, No. 2, 167-170 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. A. Kajaks, S. A. Reihmane, and J. E. Lejnieks, “Effect of water on the physicomechanical properties of composites containing secondary polyethylene and linen yarn production wastes,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 38, No. 4, 351-356 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. E. Lejnieks, J. A. Kajaks, and S. A. Reihmane, “Correlation between the mechanical properties and the amount of desorbed water for composites based on low-density polyethylene and linen yarn production waste,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 41, No. 4, 351-356 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Bakradze, J. Kajaks, S. Reihmane, R. Krutokhvostov, and V. Bulmanis, “The influence of water sorption-desorption cycles on the mechanical properties of composites based on recycled polyolefine and linen yarn production waste,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 43, No. 6, 573-580 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. G. Bakradze, J. A. Kajaks, S. A. Reihmane, and J. E. Lejnieks, “Correlation between the mechanical properties and the amount of desorbed water for composites based on a recycled low-density polyethylene and linen yarn production waste,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 43, No. 5, 629-638 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. A. C. Sirotong, L. G. Tabil, S. Panigrahi, and W. J. Crerar, “Extrusion compounding of flax-fiber-reinforced polyethylene composites: Effects of fiber content and extrusion parameters,” J. Natur. Fibers, 7, No. 4, 289-306 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Thygsen, Properties of Hemp Fiberpolymer Composites - An Optimization of Fiber Properties Using Novel Defibration Methods and Fibre Characterization, Roskilde, Denmark (2006), pp. 21, 24, and 27.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. C. R. Carlos, “Mechanical Properties of Reinforced Thermoplastics,” D. W. Clegg and A. A. Colleyor (eds.), Elsevier Appl. Sci. Publ., London, Ch. 3, 110-162 (1986).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Manson and L. Sperling, Polymer Blends and Composites, Plenum Press, New York (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Nestore
    • 1
  • J. Kajaks
    • 1
  • I. Vancovicha
    • 1
  • S. Reihmane
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Polymer MaterialsRiga Technical UniversityRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations