The enhanced concentration of methane (CH4) in the atmosphere is significantly responsible for the ominous threat of global warming. Rice (Oryza) paddies are one of the largest anthropogenic sources of atmospheric CH4. Abatement strategies for mitigating CH4 emissions from rice fields offer an avenue to reduce the global atmospheric burden of methane and hence the associated menace of climate change. Projections on population growth suggest that world rice production must increase to meet the population’s food energy demand. In this scenario, those mitigation options are advocated which address both the objectives of methane mitigation and increased production of rice simultaneously. In this paper, we have formulated a nonlinear mathematical model to investigate the effectiveness and limitations of such options in reducing and stabilizing the atmospheric concentration of CH4 while increasing rice yield. In modeling process, it is assumed that implementation rate of mitigation options is proportional to the enhanced concentration of atmospheric CH4 due to rice fields. Model analysis reveals that implementation of mitigation options not always provides “win-win” outcome. Conditions under which these options reduce and stabilize CH4 emission from rice fields have been derived. These conditions are useful in devising strategies for effective abatement of CH4 emission from rice fields along with sustainable increase in rice yield. The analysis also shows that CH4 abatement highly depends on efficiencies of mitigation options to mitigate CH4 emission and improve rice production as well as on the implementation rate of mitigation options. Numerical simulation is carried out to verify theoretical findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ali MA, Farouque MG, Haque M, Kabir AU (2012) Influence of soil amendments on mitigating methane emissions and sustaining rice productivity in paddy soil ecosystems of Bangladesh. J Environ Sci & Natural Resources 5(1):179–185.
Aulakh MS, Wassmann R, Bueno C, Rennenberg H (2001) Impact of root exudates of different cultivars and plant development stages of rice (Oryza sativa L.) on methane production in a paddy soil. Plant Soil 230:77–86
Bortz DM, Nelson PW (2004) Sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear lumped parameter model of HIV infection dynamics. Bull Math Biol 66:1009–1026
Bouwman AF (1991) Agronomic aspects of wetland rice cultivation and associated methane emissions. Biochemistry 15:65–88
Cao M, Gregson K, Marshall S, Dent JB, Heal OW (1996) Global methane emissions from rice paddies. Chemosphere 33(5):879–897
Freedman HI, So JWH (1985) Global stability and persistence of simple food chains. Math Biosci 76:69–86
Ghosh S, Majumdar D, Jain MC (2003) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from an irrigated rice of north India. Chemosphere 51:181–195
Harris JM, Kennedy S (1999) Carrying capacity in agriculture: global and regional issues. Ecol Econ 29:443–461
Holling CS (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can Entomol 91:293–320
Husin YA, Murdiyarso D, Khalil MAK, Rasmussen RA, Shearer MJ, Sabiham S, Sunar A, Adijuwana H (1995) Methane flux from Indonesian wetland rice: the effects of water management and rice variety. Chemosphere 31(4):3153–3180
IPCC (2007a) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
IPCC (2007b) Agriculture. In: Metz B, Davidson O R, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Itoh M, Sudo S, Mori S, Saito H, Yoshida T, Shiratori Y, Suga S, Yoshikawa N, Suzue Y, Mizukami H, Mochida T, Yagi K (2011) Mitigation of methane emissions from paddy fields by prolonging midseason drainage. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:359–372
Khosa MK, Sidhu BS, Benbi DK (2011) Methane emission from rice fields in relation to management of irrigation water. J Environ Biol 32:169–172
LaSalle JP, Lefschetz S (1961) Stability by Lyapunov’s second method with applications. Academic Press, New York
Li C, Qiu J, Frolking S, Xiao X, Salas W, Moore B III, Boles S, Huang Y, Sass R (2002) Reduced methane emissions from large-scale changes in water management of China’s rice paddies during 1980–2000. Geophys Res Lett 29(20):33
Linquist BA, Adviento-Borbe MA, Pittelkow CM, Kessel C van, Groenigen KJ van (2012) Fertilizer management practices and greenhouse gas emissions from rice systems: A quantitative review and analysis. Field Crops Res 135:10–21
Lu WF, Chen W, Duan BW, Guo WM, Lu Y, Lantin RS, Wassmann R, Neue HU (2000) Methane emissions and mitigation options in irrigated rice fields in southeast China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58:65–73
Matthews R, Wassmann R (2003) Modelling the impacts of climate change and methane emission reductions on rice production: a review. Eur J Agron 19:573–598
Minami K (1995) The effect of nitrogen fertilizer use and other practices on methane emission from flooded rice. Fertil Res 40:71–84
Osman KA, Mustafa AM, Ali F, Yonglain Z, Fazhan Q (2012) Genetic variability for yield and related attributes of upland rice genotypes in semi arid zone (Sudan). Afr J Agric Res 7(33):4613–4619
Perko L (2000) Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag
Rao MRM (1981) Ordinary differential equations: theory and applications. East-West Press Pvt Ltd
Rath AK, Swain B, Ramakrishnan B, Panda D, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (1999) Influence of fertilizer management and water regime on methane emission from rice fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 76:99–107
Rosenzweig C, Tubiello FN (2007) Adaptation and mitigation strategies in agriculture: an analysis of potential synergies. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Change 12:855–873
Sass RL, Fisher FM, Wang YB, Turner FT, Jund MF (1992) Methane emission from rice fields: The effect of floodwater management. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 6(3):249–262
Sass RL, Fisher FM, Lewis ST, Jund MF, Turner FT (1994) Methane emissions from rice fields: Effect of soil properties. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 8(2):135–140
Schütz H, Seiler W, Conrad R (1990) Influence of soil temperature on methane emission from rice paddy fields. Biogeochemistry 11(2):77–95
Setyanto P, Rosenani AB, Boer R, Fauziah CI, Khanif MJ (2004) The effect of rice cultivars on methane emission from irrigated rice field. Indones J Agric Sci 5(1):20–31
Shin YK, Yun SH, Park ME, Lee BL (1996) Mitigation options for methane emission from rice fields in Korea. Ambio 25(4):289–291
Singh SN, Verma A, Tyagi L (2003) Investigating options for attenuating methane emission from Indian rice fields. Environ Int 29:547–553
Tyagi L, Kumari B, Singh SN (2010) Water management – a tool for methane mitigation from irrigated paddy fields. Sci Total Environ 408:1085–1090
Xie B, Zheng X, Zhou Z, Gu J, Zhu B, Chen X, Shi Y, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Liu C, Yao Z, Zhu J (2010) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on CH 4 emission from rice fields: multi-site field observations. Plant Soil 326:393–401
Xu S, Jaffe PR, Mauzerall DL (2007) A process-based model for methane emission from flooded rice paddy systems. Ecol Model 205:475–491
Yagi K, Tsuruta H, Kanda K, Minami K(1996) Effect of water management on methane emission from a Japanese rice paddy field: Automated methane monitoring. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 10(2):255–267
Yagi K, Tsuruta H, Minami K (1997) Possible options for mitigating methane emission from rice cultivation. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 49:213–220
Wang ZY, Xu Y C, Li Z, Guo YX, Wassmann R, Neue HU, Lantin RS, Buendia LV, Ding YP, Wang ZZ (2000) A four-year record of methane emissions from irrigated rice fields in the Beijing region of China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58:55–63
Wassmann R, Lantin RS, Neue HU, Buendia LV, Corton TM, Lu Y (2000) Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. III. Mitigation options and future research needs. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58:23–36
Wassmann R, Hosen Y, Sumfleth K (2009) Reducing Methane Emissions from Irrigated Rice. Focus 16, Brief 3, An Agenda for Negotiation in Copenhagen 2020 vision for food, agriculture and the environment. Washington, D.C, International Food Policy Research Institute
The authors are grateful to the handling editor and the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments, which have improved the quality of this paper. The second author thankfully acknowledges the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India for providing financial assistance in the form of Senior Research Fellowship (20-12/2009(ii) EU-IV).
About this article
Cite this article
Misra, A., Verma, M. Modeling the impact of mitigation options on methane abatement from rice fields. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 19, 927–945 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9451-5
- Mathematical model
- Methane gas
- Rice paddies
- Sensitivity analysis
- Stability analysis