Abstract
Land recovery and the improvement of lands affected by desertification for agricultural use, is achieved when a sustained recovery of agricultural productivity over time is obtained. In the areas affected by desertification and drought, it is common that the ecosystems do not have enough funding for water management and irrigation. This situation leads to an inadequate assessment of the environmental goods and services in arid zones. As a result we have a misuse of these dry lands. Many countries are implementing policies and making investments and efforts to mitigate arid land degradation and desertification through the National Action Programs (NAP). However, for the long term planning of mitigation and adaptation strategies, it is necessary to know the cost of recovery and land improvement in certain areas in order to forecast the budgets. This is the main objective of this paper in order to combat desertification and drought in central northern Chile. We have calculated a recovery cost per hectare by region and for each of the agriculture, livestock and forestry (ALF) promotion agencies. The results indicate that the cost of land reclamation in the northern regions is much higher than in the southern regions of this studied area. The cost is especially high for Region II, where investment per hectare is almost to 3000 US$ per hectare. At the other extreme is the Region VII, in the south of the studied area where the investment required per hectare barely reaches 500 US$. The contribution of the promotion agencies to the total cost also varied among regions and agencies. We discuss the results within a context of recovery cost per hectare depending on the different environmental characteristics and agricultural development of each of the studied regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barr R, Frankhauser S, Hamilton K (2010) Adaptation investments: a resource allocation framework. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15:843–858
Biggs R, Bohensky E, Desanker EV et al (2004) Nature supporting people: the Southern Africa Millennium Assessment. CSIR, Praetoria
Carpenter SR, Bennett EM, Peterson GD (2006) Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol Soc 11(1):29
CONAF (1999) Mapa preliminar de la desertificación en Chile. Ministerio de Agricultura, Santiago, Chile. Programa FAO, PNUMA Desertificación. Chile
Daily GC (1995) Restoring value to the world’s degraded lands. Science 269(5222):350–354
Dixon JA, James DE, Sherman PB (eds) (1990) Dryland Management: Economic Case Studies. Earthscan, London
Feehan J, Harley M, Van Minnen J (2009) Climate change in Europe. 1. Impacto n terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29(3):409–421
Gitay H, Brown SD, Easterling W et al (2001) Ecosystems and their goods and services. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 237–315
INE (2009) Environment: annual report 2007. National Institute of Statistics. Ministry of Economy, Chile
Lal R (2009) Soils and food sufficiency. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29(1):113–133
Lal P, Alavalapati JRR, Mercer E (2011) Socio-economic impacts of climate change on rural United States. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 16(7):819–844
Le Houerou HN (1996) Climate change, drought and desertification. J Arid Environ 34:133–185
PAN (2000) Plan de Acción Nacional. Informe nacional para la implementación de la convención de las naciones unidas para el combate de la desertificación en Chile. Santiago, Chile
Quezada C, Sandoval M, Zagal E (2008) Manejo de suelos en zonas áridas. Ministerio de Agricultura de Chile
Reynolds JF, Maestre FT, Stafford Smith DM et al (2007) Natural and human dimensions of land degradation: causes and consequences. In: Canadell J, Pataki DE, Pitelka L (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems, in a changing world. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 247–258
Salinas CX (2011) Evaluación de la normativa de fomento silvoagropecuario para la lucha contra la desertificación y la sequía en Chile. PhD Dissertation. University of Basque Country, Leioa, Spain
Salinas CX, Mendieta J (2012a) Numerical model to assess the impact of the strategies to mitigate desertification. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9375-5
Salinas CX, Mendieta J (2012b) Mitigation and adaptation investments for desertification and climate change: an assessment of the socioeconomic return. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9380-8
UNCCD (1994) United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee For a Convention to Combat Desertification, Elaboration of an International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa. U.N. Doc. A/AC.241/27, 33 I.L.M. 1328. United Nations, New York
Zilberman D, Liu X, Roland-Holst D et al (2004) The economics of climate change in agriculture. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 9(2):365–382
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank to CONAF, to CNR and to SAG for their inestimable collaboration. Thank also go to Ximena Santo for her valuable help in reviewing the language of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salinas, C.X., Mendieta, J. The cost of mitigation strategies for agricultural adaptation to global change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18, 933–941 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9400-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9400-8