Advertisement

Bio-energy supply chains and stakeholders

  • Stefan Gold
Original Article

Abstract

What are the management challenges and opportunities of bio-energy chains for both running their business efficiently and effectively and fostering the relationships with most relevant external stakeholders? This question is approached by systematically reviewing papers at the interface of bio-energy and supply chain or logistics issues. The review conducted as content analysis is based on an analytic framework that conceives bio-energy chains between challenges and benefits of bio-energy production with simultaneous internal supply chain management and external stakeholder management needs. Smartly designed and operated bio-energy projects hold promising potentials of contributing to sustainable development by both mitigating climate change and strengthening adaptation capabilities. Our analysis distils specific strategies and success factors for tapping this potential on two levels: On a supply chain level, individually adapted and designed supply chain systems relying on trustful information exchange, cooperation and relational governance safeguard profitability while holding adverse ecological and social impacts of operation down; they allow, for instance, minimising costs and emissions, implementing new technologies, and coping with environmental uncertainties such as crop failures and volatile prices. On a stakeholder level, governments as key actors for designing the future legal framework of bio-energy are primary targets for lobbying activities of bio-energy representatives. Respective arguments may focus on economic development and job generation. By minimising its adverse impacts on society and eco-systems and by communicating these efforts credibly, bio-energy warrants its superiority over fossil energy systems. Involving NGOs and residents in early stages of bio-energy projects via transparent two-way communication considerably increase societal acceptance.

Keywords

Bio-energy Content analysis Literature review Stakeholder management Stakeholders Supply chain management Sustainability 

References

References of papers contained in the literature review

  1. Abraham ER, Ramachandran S, Ramalingam V (2007) Biogas: can it be an important source of energy? Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(1):67–71Google Scholar
  2. Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L (2003) Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants—status and future trends. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 109(1–3):95–106Google Scholar
  3. Ayoub N, Martins R, Wang K, Seki H, Naka Y (2007) Two levels decision system for efficient planning and implementation of bioenergy production. Energy Convers Manage 48(3):709–723Google Scholar
  4. van Belle JF, Temmerman M, Schenkel Y (2003) Three level procurement of forest residues for power plant. Biomass Bioenergy 24(4):401–409Google Scholar
  5. Caputo AC, Palumbo M, Pelagagge PM, Scacchia F (2005) Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass Bioenergy 28(1):35–51Google Scholar
  6. Caniëls MCJ, Romijn HA (2008) Supply chain development: insights from strategic niche management. Learn Organ 15(4):336–353Google Scholar
  7. Damen K, Faaij A (2006) A greenhouse gas balance of two existing international biomass import chains—The case of residue co-firing in a pulverised coal-fired power plant in the Netherlands. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11(5–6):1023–1050Google Scholar
  8. Deswarte FEI, Clark JH, Wilson AJ, Hardy JJE, Marriott R, Chahal SP, Jackson C, Heslop G, Birkett M, Bruce TJ, Whiteley G (2007) Toward an integrated straw-based biorefinery. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 1(4):245–254Google Scholar
  9. Dunnett A, Adjiman C, Shah N (2007) Biomass to heat supply chains: applications of process optimization. Trans IChemE Part B 85:419–429Google Scholar
  10. Elghali L, Clift R, Sinclair P, Panoutsou C, Bauen A (2007) Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems. Energy Policy 35(12):6075–6083Google Scholar
  11. Gasol CM, Martínez S, Rigola M, Rieradevall J, Anton A, Carrasco J, Ciria P, Gabarrell X (2009) Feasibility assessment of poplar bioenergy systems in the Southern Europe. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 13(4):801–812Google Scholar
  12. Ghafoori E, Flynn PC (2007) Optimizing the logistics of anaerobic digestion of manure. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137(1):625–637Google Scholar
  13. Gronalt M, Rauch P (2007) Designing a regional forest fuel supply network. Biomass Bioenergy 31(6):393–402Google Scholar
  14. Gustavsson L, Madlener R, Hoen HF, Jungmeier G, Karjalainen T, Klöhn S, Mahapatra K, Pohjola J, Solberg B, Spelter H (2006) The role of wood material for greenhouse gas mitigation. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11(5–6):1097–1127Google Scholar
  15. Hamelinck CN, Suurs RAA, Faaij APC (2005) International bioenergy transport cost and energy balance. Biomass Bioenergy 29(2):114–134Google Scholar
  16. Heaton EA, Clifton-Brown J, Voigt TB, Jones MB, Long SP (2004) Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience and projections for Illinois. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 9(4):433–451Google Scholar
  17. Heinimö J, Ojanen V, Kass T (2008) Views on the international market for energy biomass in 2020: results from a scenario study. Int J Energy Sect Manage 2(4):547–569Google Scholar
  18. van der Horst D (2008) Social enterprise and renewable energy—emerging initiatives and communities of practice. Soc Enterpr J 4(3):171–185Google Scholar
  19. Junginger M, Bolkesjø T, Bradley D, Dolzand P, Faaij A, Heinimö J, Hektor B, Leistad Ø, Ling E, Perry M, Piacente E, Rosillo-Calle F, Ryckmans Y, Schouwenberg PP, Solberg B, Trømborg E, da Silva WA, de Wit M (2008) Developments in international bioenergy trade. Biomass Bioenergy 32(8):717–729Google Scholar
  20. Jungmeier G, Spitzer J (2001) Greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy from agriculture compared to fossil energy for heat and electricity supply. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 60(1–3):267–273Google Scholar
  21. Korhonen J, Niutanen V (2003) Material and energy flows of a local forest industry system in Finland. Sustain Dev 11(3):121–132Google Scholar
  22. Kumar A, Sokhansanj S, Flynn PC (2006) Development of a multicriteria assessment model for ranking biomass feedstock collection and transportation systems. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129(1–3):71–87Google Scholar
  23. Leduc S, Schmid E, Obersteiner M, Riahi K (2009) Methanol production by gasification using a geographically explicit model. Biomass Bioenergy 33(5):745–751Google Scholar
  24. Londo M, Deurwaarder E (2007) Developments in EU biofuels policy related to sustainability issues: overview and outlook. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 1(4):292–302Google Scholar
  25. Mabee WE, Fraser EDG, McFarlane PN, Saddler JN (2006) Canadian biomass reserves for biorefining. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129(1–3):22–40Google Scholar
  26. Mabee WE, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2005) Assessing the emerging biorefinery sector in Canada. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 123(1–3):765–778Google Scholar
  27. Madlener R, Bachhiesl M (2007) Socio-economic drivers of large urban biomass cogeneration: sustainable energy supply for Austria’s capital Vienna. Energy Policy 35(2):1075–1087Google Scholar
  28. Mayfield CA, Foster CD, Smith CT, Gan J, Fox S (2007) Opportunities, barriers, and strategies for forest bioenergy and bio-based product development in the Southern United States. Biomass Bioenergy 31(9):631–637Google Scholar
  29. McCormick K, Kåberger T (2007) Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity, and supply chain co-ordination. Biomass Bioenergy 31(7):443–452Google Scholar
  30. Möller B (2003) Least-cost allocation strategies for wood fuel supply for distributed generation in Denmark—A geographical study. Int J Sustainable Energy 23(4):187–197Google Scholar
  31. Möller B, Nielsen PS (2007) Analysing transport costs of Danish forest wood chip resources by means of continuous cost surfaces. Biomass Bioenergy 31(5):291–298Google Scholar
  32. Owens GM (2007) Analyzing impacts of bioenergy expansion in China using strategic environmental assessment. Manag Environ Qual Int J 18(4):396–412Google Scholar
  33. Perpiná C, Alfonso D, Pérez-Navarro A, Penalvo E, Vargas C, Cárdenas R (2009) Methodology based on Geographic Information Systems for biomass logistics and transport optimization. Renewable Energy 34(3):555–565Google Scholar
  34. Perry M, Rosillo-Calle F (2008) Recent trends and future opportunities in UK bioenergy: maximising biomass penetration in a centralised energy system. Biomass Bioenergy 32(8):688–701Google Scholar
  35. Pessoa-Jr A, Roberto IC, Menossi M, dos Santos RR, Filho SO, Penna TCV (2005) Perspectives on bioenergy and biotechnology in Brazil. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121(1–3):59–70Google Scholar
  36. Puy N, Tàbara D, Molins JB, Almera JB, Rieradevall J (2008) Integrated assessment of forest bioenergy systems in Mediterranean basin areas: The case of Catalonia and the use of participatory IA-focus groups. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 12(5):1451–1464Google Scholar
  37. Rauch P (2007) SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria. Eur J For Res 126(3):413–420Google Scholar
  38. Searcy E, Flynn P, Ghafoori E, Kumar A (2007) The relative cost of biomass energy transport. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137–140(1–12):639–659Google Scholar
  39. Sims REH, Venturi P (2004) All-year-round harvesting of short rotation coppice eucalyptus compared with the delivered costs of biomass from more conventional short season, harvesting systems. Biomass Bioenergy 26(1):27–37Google Scholar
  40. Thornley P, Rogers J, Huang Y (2008) Quantification of employment from biomass power plants. Renewable Energy 33(8):1922–1927Google Scholar
  41. Woods J, Hemstock S, Burnyeat W (2006) Bio-energy systems at the community level in the South Pacific: impacts & monitoring. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11(2):469–500Google Scholar
  42. Yamamoto H, Fujino J, Yamaji K (2001) Evaluation of bioenergy potential with a multi-regional global-land-use-and-energy model. Biomass Bioenergy 21(3):185–203Google Scholar
  43. Yoshioka T, Aruga K, Nitami T, Kobayashi H, Sakai H (2005) Energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) balance of logging residues as alternative energy resources: system analysis based on the method of a life cycle inventory (LCI) analysis. J For Res 10(2):125–134Google Scholar

Further references

  1. Allen J, Browne M, Hunter A, Boyd J, Palmer H (1998) Logistics management and costs of biomass fuel supply. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 28(6):463–477Google Scholar
  2. Arshinder KA, Deshmukh SG (2008) Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 115(2):316–335Google Scholar
  3. Berelson B (1952) Content analysis in communications research. The Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  4. Berndes G, Hoogwijk M, van den Broek R (2003) The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies. Biomass Bioenergy 25(1):1–28Google Scholar
  5. von Blottnitz H, Curran MA (2007) A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J Cleaner Prod 15(7):607–619Google Scholar
  6. Börjesson P, Berglund M (2006) Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: fuel-cycle emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 30(5):469–485Google Scholar
  7. Cannon JP, Achrol RS, Gundlach GT (2000) Contracts, norms, and plural form governance. J Acad Mark 28(2):180–194Google Scholar
  8. Chen IJ, Paulraj A (2004) Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. J Oper Manage 22(2):119–150Google Scholar
  9. Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the cooperation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manage Rev 20(1):65–91Google Scholar
  10. Duschek S (2004) Inter-firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Manage Rev 15(1):53–73Google Scholar
  11. Dyer J, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23(4):660–679Google Scholar
  12. Ecosense (ed) (2007) Klimafaktor Biokraftstoff. Experten zur Nachhaltigkeitszertifizierung [Bioenergy and its impact on the climate: experts discuss certification ensuring sustainability criteria]. Schriftenreihe zu Nachhaltigkeit und CSR, Volume 1, 2007Google Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14(4):532–550Google Scholar
  14. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (ed) (2007) Risk Communication in Action—The tools of message mapping. EPA/625/R-06/012, August 2007. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/625r06012/625r06012.pdf. Cited 20 August 2009
  15. Faaij A (2006) Modern biomass conversion technologies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11(2):335–367Google Scholar
  16. Fynes B, de Búrca S, Mangan J (2008) The effect of relationship characteristics on relationship quality and performance. Int J Prod Econ 111(1):56–69Google Scholar
  17. Fink A (2005) Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman RE, Reed DL (1983) Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. Calif Manage Rev 25(3):88–106Google Scholar
  19. Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer TH (2009) The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) 106(25):10219–10223Google Scholar
  20. Gold S, Seuring S, Beske P (2010) Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organisational resources: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsibility Environ Manage 17(4):230–245Google Scholar
  21. Golder Associates / ECOFYS (2009) Benchmarks of Bioenergy Permitting Procedures in the European Union. Final Report, January 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/bioenergy/doc/installations/ecofys_final_report_benchmark_bioenergy.pdf. Cited 4 May 2010
  22. Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, Van Den Broek R, Berndes G, Gielen D, Turkenburg W (2003) Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioenergy 25(2):119–133Google Scholar
  23. Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ Jr, Arrfelt M (2007) Strategic supply chain management: improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strateg Manage J 28(10):1035–1052Google Scholar
  24. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2009) Key world energy statistics 2009. www.iea.org/Textbase/nppdf/free/2009/key_stats_2009.pdf. Cited 28 September 2010
  25. IEA Task 40 (2005) Sustainable International Bioenergy Trade, under the IEA Bio-energy Agreement. http://www.bioenergytrade.org. Cited 28 September 2010
  26. Jauch LR, Osborn RN, Martin TN (1980) Structured content analysis of cases: a complementary method for organizational research. Acad Manage Rev 5(4):517–525Google Scholar
  27. Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP (1997) A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanism. Acad Manage Rev 22(4):911–946Google Scholar
  28. Kanter RM (1994) Collaborative advantage: the art of alliances. Harv Bus Rev 72(4):96–108Google Scholar
  29. Kerckow B (2007) Competition between agricultural and renewable energy production. Q J Int Agr 46(4):333–347Google Scholar
  30. Krause DR, Ellram LM (1997) Critical elements of supplier development. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 3(1):21–31Google Scholar
  31. Mayring P (2000) Qualitative Content Analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(2) [Online Journal]. http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-e/2-00inhalt-e.htm. Cited 24 April 2009
  32. Mayring P (2003) Qualitative Inhaltanalyse—Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis—basics and techniques]. Beltz Verlag, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  33. McCormick K, Kåberger T (2005) Exploring a pioneering bioenergy system: The case of Enköping in Sweden. J Clean Prod 13(5):1003–1014Google Scholar
  34. Mentzer JT, Kahn KB (1995) A framework of logistics research. J Bus Logist 16(1):231–251Google Scholar
  35. Mentzer JT, DeWitt W, Keebler JS, Min S, Nix NW, Smith CD, Zacharia ZG (2001) Defining supply chain management. J Bus Logist 22(2):1–25Google Scholar
  36. Meredith J (1993) Theory building through conceptual methods. Int J Oper Prod Manage 13(5):3–11Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 22(4):853–886Google Scholar
  38. Morgan MJ, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: A mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Offermann R, Seidenberger T, Thrän D, Kaltschmitt M, Zinoviev S, Miertus S (2010) Assessment of global bioenergy potentials. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, doi: 10.1007/s11027-010-9247-9
  40. Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strateg Manage J 23(8):707–725Google Scholar
  41. Ruf BM, Muralidhar K, Brown RM, Paul K (2001) An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective. J Bus Ethics 32(2):143–156Google Scholar
  42. Searcy DL, Mentzer JT (2003) A framework for conducting and evaluating research. J Account Lit 22:130–167Google Scholar
  43. Seuring S (2009) The product-relationship-matrix as framework for strategic supply chain design based on operations theory. Int J Prod Econ 120(1):221–232Google Scholar
  44. Seuring S, Müller M (2008a) Core issues in sustainable supply chain management—a Delphi study. Bus Strategy Environ 17(8):455–466Google Scholar
  45. Seuring S, Müller M (2008b) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Cleaner Prod 16(15):1699–1710Google Scholar
  46. Sharfman MP, Shaft TM, Anex RP Jr (2009) The road to cooperative supply chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among pro-active firms. Bus Strategy Environ 18(1):1–13Google Scholar
  47. Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2005) An integrative framework of supply chain collaboration. Int J Logist Manag 16(2):257–274Google Scholar
  48. Sims REH (2003) Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of society, the economy and the environment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 8(4):349–370Google Scholar
  49. Sims RR, Brinkmann J (2003) Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). J Bus Ethics 45(3):243–254Google Scholar
  50. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285Google Scholar
  51. Spekman RE, Kamauff JW Jr, Myhr N (1998) An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 28(8):630–650Google Scholar
  52. Stank TP, Crum MR, Arango M (1999) Benefits of interfirm coordination in food industry in supply chains. J Bus Logist 20(2):21–41Google Scholar
  53. Steinmann MS, Holm-Müller K (2010) Thuenen rings of biogas production—the effect of differences in transport costs of energy crops in the choice of renewable resources by biogas plants. Ger J Agric Econ 59(1):1–12Google Scholar
  54. Steurer R (2006) Mapping stakeholder theory anew: from the ‘stakeholder theory of the firm’ to three perspectives on business-society relations. Bus Strategy Environ 15(1):55–69Google Scholar
  55. Steurer R, Langer ME, Konrad A, Martinuzzi A (2005) Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: a theoretical exploration of business-society relations. J Bus Ethics 61(3):263–281Google Scholar
  56. Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manage 14(3):207–222Google Scholar
  57. UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs) (2006) Energy for sustainable development. United Nations, New York, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/trends2006/energy.pdf. Cited 28 September 2010
  58. Upham P, Shackley S (2006) Stakeholder opinion of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: implications for bioenergy planning and policy. J Environ Plann Policy Manage 8(1):45–66Google Scholar
  59. Venema HD, Rehman IH (2007) Decentralized renewable energy and the climate change mitigation-adaptation nexus. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 12(5):875–900Google Scholar
  60. Wathne KH, Heide JB (2000) Opportunism in interfirm relationships: forms, outcomes, and solutions. J Mark 64(4):36–51Google Scholar
  61. WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen [German Advisory Council on Global Change]) (ed) (2009) World in transition—Future bioenergy and sustainable land use. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (ed) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  63. Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad Manage Rev 14(4):516–531Google Scholar
  64. Weyman AK, Kelly CJ (1999) Risk perception and risk communication: a review of literature. Health & Safety Executive Books, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  65. Wheeler D, Fabig H, Boele R (2002) Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni. J Bus Ethics 39(3):297–318Google Scholar
  66. Williamson O (1991) Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm Sci Q 36(2):269–296Google Scholar
  67. Williamson O (1996) The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu L, Beamon B (2006) Supply chain coordination and cooperation mechanisms: an attribute-based approach. J Supply Chain Manag 42(1):4–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of International ManagementUniversity of KasselWitzenhausenGermany

Personalised recommendations