, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 49–69 | Cite as

Organizational Legitimacy of International Research Collaborations: Crossing Boundaries in the Middle East

  • Anatoly Oleksiyenko


Cross-border academic collaborations in conflict zones are vulnerable to escalated turbulence, liability concerns and flagging support. Multi-level stakeholder engagement at home and abroad is essential for securing the political and financial sustainability of such collaborations. This study examines the multilayered stakeholder arrangements within an international academic health science network contributing to peace-building in the Middle East. While organizational forms in this collaboration change to reflect the structural, epistemic and political expectations of various support groups operating locally and globally, the legitimacy of the international research and its contribution to the peace-building process last as long as institutional norms of academic enterprise – integrity, impartiality and collegiality – are sustained. This paper analyzes the reconciliatory strategies used by the collaborating health scientists to mitigate organizational turbulence, reduce resource asymmetries and continually build and rebuild bridges across stakeholder communities.


International research collaboration Organizational legitimacy Boundary management Academic health science center 



I am indebted to a number of individuals from whose comments and suggestions this study benefitted. Many thanks to Professors Arnold Noyek, William G. Tierney and Simon Marginson for their valuable insights. I am grateful to the two anonymous reviewers of this journal for their helpful advice.


  1. Abu-Saba, Mary B. 1999. War-related trauma and stress characteristics of American University of Beirut students. Journal of Traumatic Stress 12(1): 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, Melissa S., and Nicholas H. Steneck (eds.). 2011. International research collaborations: Much to be gained, many ways to get in trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ashforth, Blake E., and Barrie W. Gibbs. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science 1(2): 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashoka. 2009. Ashoka Fellows: Arnold Noyek. Retrieved on May 10, 2011 from:
  5. Austin, James E. 2000. The collaboration challenge: How non-profits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Becher, Tony, and Paul Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines, 2nd ed. Bristol: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beerkens, Eric, and Marijik van der Wende. 2007. The paradox in international cooperation: Institutionally embedded universities in a global environment. Higher Education 53: 61–79.Google Scholar
  8. Bunton, Sarah A., and William Mallon. 2007. The continued evolution of faculty appointment and tenure policies at U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine 82(3): 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CISEPO. 2005. Building bridges to peace. Collection of press-releases. Toronto: CISEPO.Google Scholar
  10. CISEPO. 2011. Building bridges to peace. Accessed on May 28, 2011.
  11. Clark, Burton R. 1956. Organizational adaptation and precarious values: a case study. American Sociological Review 21: 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, Burton R. 1983. The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, Andrew F., John J. Kirton, and Ted Schrecker. 2007. Governing global health: Challenge, response, innovation. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Dajani, Khuloud K., and Rafael S. Carel. 2002. Neighbors and enemies: Lessons to be learned from the Palestinian-Israeli conflict regarding cooperation in public health. Croatian Medical Journal 43: 138–140.Google Scholar
  15. Dechaine, D. Robert. 2002. Humanitarian space and the social imaginary: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders and the rhetoric of global community. Journal of Communication Inquiry 26: 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deegan, C., M. Rankin, and P. Voght. 2000. Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum 24(1): 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dowling, John, and Jeffrey Pfeffer. 1975. Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review 18(1): 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evangelista, Matthew. 1999. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Feller, Irwin. 2007. Interdisciplinarity: Paths taken and not taken. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 39(6): 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finet, Dayna. 1993. Effects of boundary spanning communication on the sociopolitical delegitimation of an organization. Management Communication Quarterly 7(1): 36–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frost, Laura, Michael Reich, and Tomoko Fujisaki. 2002. A partnership for Ivermectin: Social worlds and boundary objects. In Public private partnerships for public health, ed. Michael Reich, 87–114. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gangrade, Kesharichand D., and Rameshwar P. Misra. 1990. Conflict resolution through non-violence: Role of the universities. Ghandian Studies on Peace Research Series -2. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Geiger, Roger. 1990. Organized research units – Their role in the development of university research. Journal of Higher Education 61(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghani, Ashraf, and Clare Lockhart. 2008. Fixing failed states: A framework for rebuilding a fractured world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gluncić, Vičko, Dražen Pulanić, Matija Prka, Ana Marušić, and Matko Marušić. 2001. Curricular and extracurricular activities of medical students during war, Zagreb University School of Medicine, 1991–1995. Academic Medicine 76(1): 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gulati, Ranjay, and Harbir Singh. 1998. The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(4): 781–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guston, David H. 2001. Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26(4): 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Isralowitz, Richard, Gary Sussman, Mohamed Afifi, Richard Rawson, Thomas Babor, and Maristela Monteiro. 2001. Substance abuse policy and peace in the Middle East: a Palestinian and Israeli partnership. Addiction 96: 973–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, Glen A., and Anatoly Oleksiyenko. 2011. The internationalization of Canadian university research: A global higher education matrix analysis of multi-level governance. Higher Education 61(1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jongbloed, Ben, Jürgen Enders, and Carlo Salerno. 2008. Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education 56(3): 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaul, Inge, Isabelle Grunberg, and Mark Stern. 1999. Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khan, Ali M., Laura M. Janneck, Jay Bhatt, Rajesh Panjabi, Youssra Marjoua, and Aleem Bharwani. 2009. Building a Health-Peace Movement: Academic Medicine’s Role in Generating Solutions to Global Problems. Academic Medicine 84(11): 1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirk, Jackie. 2007. Education and fragile states. Globalisation, Societies, and Education 5(2): 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirch, Darrell G., R. Kevin Grigsby, Wayne W. Zolko, Jay Moskowitz, David S. Hefner, Wiley W. Souba, Josephine M. Carubia, and S. Baron. 2005. Reinventing the Academic Health Center. Academic Medicine 80(11): 980–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lattuca, Lisa R. 2001. Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among colleges and university faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Macfarlane, Sarah B., Marian Jacobs, and Ephata E. Kaaya. 2008. In the name of global health: Trends in academic institutions. Journal of Public Health Policy 29(4): 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacQueen, Graeme, and Joanna Santa-Barbara. 2000. Peace Building Through Health Initiatives. British Medical Journal 321: 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mallon, William T. 2006. The financial management of research centers and institutes at U.S. medical schools: Findings from six institutions. Academic Medicine 81(6): 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marginson, Simon, and Gary Rhoades. 2002. Beyond national states, markets and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education 43(3): 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marginson, Simon. 2007. Rethinking public-private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education 53(3): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Markle, William H., Melanie A. Fisher, and Raymond Smego. 2007. Understanding global health. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical.Google Scholar
  43. Massey, Joseph Eric. 2001. Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organizations in crisis. Journal of Business Communication 38(2): 153–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCoy, David, Charles Mwansambo, Anthony Costello, and Azad Khan. 2008. Academic partnerships between rich and poor countries. Lancet 371(9618): 1055–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miles, Matthew B., and Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Moore, Dahila, and Salem Aweiss. 2008. Strategies of Constructing Social Identities in conflict-Ridden Areas: The Case of Young Jews, Arabs and Palestinians. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 7(1): 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moses, Hamilton, Samuel O. Thier, and David H.M. Matheson. 2005. Why Have Academic Medical Centres Survived? JAMA 293(12): 1495–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Noyek, Arnold M., Harvey Skinner, Dave Davis, Ian Clark, Abi Sriharan, and Catherine G. Chalin. 2005. Building bridges of understanding through continuing education and professional development of Arabs and Israelis. Journal of Continuing Education in Health Professions 25: 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Donovan, Gary. 2002. Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3): 344–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oleksiyenko, Anatoly, and Creso M. Sá. 2010. Resource Asymmetries and Cumulative Advantages: Canadian and US Research Universities and the Field of Global Health. Higher Education 59(3): 367–385.Google Scholar
  51. Osborn, Richard N., and John Hagedoorn. 1997. The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of inter- organizational alliances and networks. Academy of Management Journal 40: 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oweini, Ahmad A. 1998. How Students Coped with the War: The Experience of Lebanon. Journal of Higher Education 69(4): 406–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pedersen, Duncan. 2002. Political violence, ethnic conflict, and contemporary wars: broad implications for health and social well-being. Social Science Medicine 55(2): 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perrow, Charles. 1970. Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  55. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald Salancik. 1978/2003. The External Control of Organization: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ramsey, Paul G., and Edward D. Miller. 2009. A Single Mission for Academic Medicine: Improving Health. The Journal of American Medical Association 301(14): 1475–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reich, Michael (ed.). 2002. Public private partnerships for public health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ryan, Christine, and Peter Walsh. 2004. Collaboration of public sector agencies: reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management 17(7): 621–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sá, Creso M., and Anatoly Oleksiyenko. 2011. Between the local and the global: organized research units and international collaborations in the health sciences. Higher Education 62(3): 367–382.Google Scholar
  60. Scolnik, Dennis. 2007. Health as a Bridge to Peace: CISEPO as a Case Study. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  61. Siegel, David J. 2010. Organizing for social partnership: Higher education for cross-border collaboration. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Skinner, Harvey, et al. 2005. Promoting Arab and Israeli cooperation: A model for peacebuilding through health initiatives. The Lancet 365(9466): 1274–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Skinner, Harvey, and Abi Sriharan. 2007. Building cooperation through health initiatives: an Arab and Israeli case study. Conflict and Health 1: 8. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sriharan, Abi, Ziad Abdeen, Dennis Bojrab, Shukri David, Ziad Elnasser, Tim Patterson, Robert Shprintzen, Harvey Skinner, Yehudah Roth, and Arnold Noyek. 2009. Academic Medicine as a Bridge to Peace: Building Arab and Israeli Cooperation. Academic Medicine 84(11): 1488–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Star, Susan L., and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stein, Janice, Richard Stren, Joy Fitzgibbon, and Melissa Maclean. 2001. Networks of knowledge. Collaborative innovation in international learning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  67. Suchman, Mark C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
  68. Tawil, Sobhi (ed.). 1997. Educational Destruction and Reconstruction in Disrupted Societies. Final Report and Case Studies of the Workshop Held on 15-16 May 1997, Geneva, Switzerland, Organized Jointly by the International Bureau of Education and the University of Geneva.Google Scholar
  69. Terreberry, Shirley. 1968. The evolution of organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 590–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tierney, William G. 2011. The role of tertiary education in fixing failed states: Globalization and public goods. Journal of Peace Education 8(2): 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Upshur, Ross E.G., and C. Shawn Tracy. 2004. Legitimacy, authority, and hierarchy: Critical challenges for evidence-based medicine. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 4: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yin, Robert. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. (Applied Social Research Method Series, 3rd Edition, Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  73. Zald, Mayer N., and Patricia Denton. 1963. From Evangelism to General Service: The Transformation of the YMCA. Administrative Science Quarterly 8(2): 214–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zwi, Anthony B. 2004. How Should the Health Community Respond to Violent Political Conflict? PLoS Med., October; 1(1): e14. Accessed on July 12, 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations