, 49:263 | Cite as

Bringing Pierre Bourdieu to Science and Technology Studies



Knowledge Production Scientific Field Technology Study Scientific Authority Political Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Albert, Mathieu, Suzanne Laberge, and Brian D. Hodges. 2009. Boundary work in the health research field: Biomedical and clinician scientists’ perceptions of social science research. Minerva 47(2): 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, Mathieu, Suzanne Laberge, Brian D. Hodges, Glenn Regehr, and Lorelei Lingard. 2008. Biomedical scientists’ perception of social science in health research. Social Science & Medicine 66: 2520–2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, Barry and Donald MacKenzie. 1979. On the Role of Interests in Scientific Change. In On the Martins of Science, ed. Roy Wallis, 49-66. Sociological Review Monograph, No. 27. University of Keele, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information. Information sur les sciences sociales 6: 19–47.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984 [1979]. Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste (trans: Nice, R.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988a [1984]. Homo Academicus (trans. Collier P.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988b. Vive la crise! For heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society 17: 773–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. The Peculiar History of Scientific Reason. Sociological Forum 6(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. Sociology in question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1995. La cause de la science. Comment l’histoire sociale des sciences sociales peut servir le progrès de ces sciences. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 106–107: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996 [1992]. The Rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field (trans. Emanuel S.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. Les usages sociaux de la science. Pour une sociologie clinique du champ scientifique. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000 [1997]. Pascalian Meditations (trans: Nice R.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004 [2001]. Science of science and reflexivity (trans: Nice R.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loic Wacquant. 1992. Introduction to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Monique de Saint-Martin. 1976. Anatomie du goût. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 2(5): 2–81.Google Scholar
  18. Brubaker, Rogers. 1985. Rethinking Classical Social Theory: The Sociological Vision of Pierre Bourdieu. Theory and society 14(6): 745–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Calhoun, Craig, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone. 1993. Bourdieu: Critical perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Clarke, Adele E. 1990. A Social Worlds Research Adventure: The Case of Reproductive Science. In Theories of Science in Society, eds. Susan Cozzens, and Thomas Gieryn, 15–42. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, Mark H. 2009. Commercialization of the University and Problem Choice by Academic Biological Scientists. Science, Technology and Human Values 34(5): 629–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and societies: discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Frickel, Scott, and Kelly Moore. 2006. The New Political Sociology of Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fujimura, Joan. 1987. “Constructing ‘do-able’ Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment. Social Studies of Science 17: 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fujimura, Joan. 1988. The Molecular Biological Bandwagon in Cancer Research: Where Social Worlds Meet. Social Problems 35(3): 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fujimura, Joan. 1996. Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Hinchliffe, Steve. 1996. Technology, Power, and Space: The Means and Ends of Geographies of Technology. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14: 659–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hong, Wei. 2008. Domination in a scientific field: Capital struggle in a Chinese isotope lab. Social Studies of Science 38(4): 543–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, Kyung-Man. 2009. What would a Bourdieuan sociology of scientific truth look like? Social Science Information. Information sur les sciences sociales 48(1): 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleinman, Daniel. 2003. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  32. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Law, John, and John Hassard. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Merton, Robert K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Murdoch, Jonathan. 1998. The Spaces of Actor Network Theory. Geoforum 29(4): 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ray, Amit and Evan Selinger, 2008. Jagannath’s Saligram: On Bruno Latour and Literary Critique After Postcoloniality. Postmodern Culture 18(2). On line journal.Google Scholar
  37. Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420Google Scholar
  38. Swartz, David. 1997. Culture & power: the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Vandenberghe, Frédéric. 1999. The Real is relational: An epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s generative structuralism. Sociological Theory 17(1): 32–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wacquant, Loïc. 1992. Toward a social praxeology: The structure and logic of Bourdieu`s sociology. In An invitation to reflexive sociology, eds. Pierre Bourdieu, and Loïc Wacquant, 2–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wilson Centre and Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Community and Environmental SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations