Minds and Machines

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 303–305 | Cite as

A Note on the Equivalence of Coherence and Constrained Coherence

  • Paolo Vicig


Constrained coherence is compared to coherence and its role in the behavioural interpretation of coherence is discussed. The equivalence of these two notions is proven for coherent conditional previsions, showing that the same course of reasoning applies to several similar concepts developed in the realm of imprecise probability theory .


Coherence Constrained coherence Subjective probability Imprecise probabilities 


  1. Crisma, L. (2006). Introduzione alla teoria delle probabilità coerenti. Trieste: Ediz. EUT.Google Scholar
  2. de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability. Chichester: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Holzer, S. (1985). On coherence and conditional prevision. Bollettino dell’ Unione Matematica Italiana C (6), Serie VI, 4(1), 441–460.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Pelessoni, R., & Vicig, P. (2005). Uncertainty modelling and conditioning with convex imprecise previsions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 39(2–3), 297–319.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Pelessoni, R., & Vicig, P. (2009). Williams coherence and beyond. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50(4), 612–626.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Walley, P. (1991). Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Williams, P. M. (2007). Notes on conditional previsions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44(3), 366–383 (Journal version of: Williams, P. M. (1975). Notes on conditional previsions. Research Report, University of Sussex).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations