Advertisement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 189–196 | Cite as

Medical oath: use and relevance of the Declaration of Geneva. A survey of member organizations of the World Medical Association (WMA)

  • Zoé Rheinsberg
  • Ramin Parsa-Parsi
  • Otmar Kloiber
  • Urban Wiesing
Short Communication

Abstract

The Declaration of Geneva is one of the core documents of medical ethics. A revision process was started by the World Medical Association (WMA) in 2016. The WMA has also used this occasion to examine how the Declaration of Geneva is used in countries throughout the world by conducting a survey of all WMA constituent members. The findings are highly important and raise urgent questions for the World Medical Association and its National Medical Associations (NMA): The Declaration of Geneva is only rarely used as an oath text despite the fact that physicians’ oaths are generally widespread. This is not consistent with the intention and claim of the Declaration of Geneva. The article then discusses three questions. Should there be one single binding oath? Which organization should be responsible for such an oath? Which oath is the most obvious candidate? In a globalized world and despite all cultural diversity, the medical profession should have one core moral basis which is binding for physicians all over the world. The most obvious candidate for an oath incorporating this moral basis is the Declaration of Geneva.

Keywords

Hippocratic Oath Profession Medical ethic World Medical Association Declaration of Geneva 

References

  1. Beauchamp, Tom and James Childress. 2015. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. 7th edition.Google Scholar
  2. Faunce, Thomas Alured. 2005. Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration. Journal of medical ethics 31 (3): 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frewer, Andreas. 2008. Medizingeschichte, Ethik und Menschenrechte. Vom Nürnberger Ärzteprozess zum Genfer Gelöbnis. MenschenRechtsMagazin 13 (2): 142–154.Google Scholar
  4. Hippocrates of Cos (1923). The Oath. Loeb Classical Library.147: 298–299. doi: 10.4159/DLCL.hippocrates_cos-oath.1923 Retrieved 31 May 2017.Google Scholar
  5. Medical Professionalism Project. 2002. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physicians’ charter. Lancet 359 (9305): 520–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sulmasy, Daniel P. 1999. What is an oath and why should a physician swear one? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (4): 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Thompson, Richard E. 2004. I swear by Apollo, the hippocratic oath is obsolete. Physician Executive 30 (2): 60–63.Google Scholar
  8. Veatch, Robert M. 2009. The sources of professional ethics: Why professions fail. Lancet 373 (9668): 1000–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wiesing, Urban and Ramin Parsa-Parsi. 2016. The World Medical Association launches a revision of the Declaration of Geneva. Bioethics 30(3): 140–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoé Rheinsberg
    • 1
  • Ramin Parsa-Parsi
    • 2
  • Otmar Kloiber
    • 3
  • Urban Wiesing
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin/Institute for Ethics and History of MedicineUniversität Tübingen/University of TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Auslandsdienst/Department of International AffairsBundesärztekammer/German Medical AssociationBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Generalsekretär des Weltärztebundes/Secretary-General of the World Medical AssociationFerney-VoltaireFrance

Personalised recommendations