Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medical oath: use and relevance of the Declaration of Geneva. A survey of member organizations of the World Medical Association (WMA)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Declaration of Geneva is one of the core documents of medical ethics. A revision process was started by the World Medical Association (WMA) in 2016. The WMA has also used this occasion to examine how the Declaration of Geneva is used in countries throughout the world by conducting a survey of all WMA constituent members. The findings are highly important and raise urgent questions for the World Medical Association and its National Medical Associations (NMA): The Declaration of Geneva is only rarely used as an oath text despite the fact that physicians’ oaths are generally widespread. This is not consistent with the intention and claim of the Declaration of Geneva. The article then discusses three questions. Should there be one single binding oath? Which organization should be responsible for such an oath? Which oath is the most obvious candidate? In a globalized world and despite all cultural diversity, the medical profession should have one core moral basis which is binding for physicians all over the world. The most obvious candidate for an oath incorporating this moral basis is the Declaration of Geneva.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Beauchamp, Tom and James Childress. 2015. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. 7th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faunce, Thomas Alured. 2005. Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration. Journal of medical ethics 31 (3): 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, Andreas. 2008. Medizingeschichte, Ethik und Menschenrechte. Vom Nürnberger Ärzteprozess zum Genfer Gelöbnis. MenschenRechtsMagazin 13 (2): 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippocrates of Cos (1923). The Oath. Loeb Classical Library.147: 298–299. doi:10.4159/DLCL.hippocrates_cos-oath.1923 Retrieved 31 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Professionalism Project. 2002. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physicians’ charter. Lancet 359 (9305): 520–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulmasy, Daniel P. 1999. What is an oath and why should a physician swear one? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (4): 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Richard E. 2004. I swear by Apollo, the hippocratic oath is obsolete. Physician Executive 30 (2): 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, Robert M. 2009. The sources of professional ethics: Why professions fail. Lancet 373 (9668): 1000–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesing, Urban and Ramin Parsa-Parsi. 2016. The World Medical Association launches a revision of the Declaration of Geneva. Bioethics 30(3): 140–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urban Wiesing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rheinsberg, Z., Parsa-Parsi, R., Kloiber, O. et al. Medical oath: use and relevance of the Declaration of Geneva. A survey of member organizations of the World Medical Association (WMA). Med Health Care and Philos 21, 189–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9794-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9794-x

Keywords

Navigation