Advertisement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 533–540 | Cite as

The current dialogue between phenomenology and psychiatry: a problematic misunderstanding

  • Camille Abettan
Scientific Contribution

Abstract

A revival of the dialogue between phenomenology and psychiatry currently takes place in the best international journals of psychiatry. In this article, we analyse this revival and the role given to phenomenology in this context. Although this dialogue seems at first sight interesting, we show that it is problematic. It leads indeed to use phenomenology in a special way, transforming it into a discipline dealing with empirical facts, so that what is called “phenomenology” has finally nothing to do with phenomenology. This so-called phenomenology tallies however with what we have always called semiology. We try to explain the reasons why phenomenology is misused in that way. In our view, this transformation of phenomenology into an empirical and objectifying discipline is explained by the role attributed to phenomenology by contemporary authors, which is to solve the problems raised by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Keywords

Daseinsanalyse Epistemology Existential analysis Existential psychotherapy Phenomenology Psychiatry 

References

  1. Abed, R. 2005. Phenomenology of psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry 186(6): 540–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreasen, N.C. 1991. Reply to  phenomenology or physicalism?. Schizophrenia Bulletin 17(2): 187–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreasen, N.C. 2007. DSM and the death of phenomenology in america: An example of unintended consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33(1): 108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binswanger, L. 1922. Einführung in die Probleme der allgemeinen Psychologie. Berlin: J. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binswanger, L. 1955. Ausgewählte Vorträge und Aufsätze. Zur Problematik der psychiatrischen Forschung und zum Problem der Psychiatrie. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
  6. Binswanger, L. 1960. Daseinsanalyse und psychotherapie II. Acta Psychotherapeutica et Psychosomatica 8(4): 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binswanger, L. 1973. Karl Jaspers und die Psychiatrie. In Karl Jaspers in der Diskussion, ed. H. Saner, 21–32. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  8. Binswanger, L. 1994. Der Mensch in der Psychiatrie. Heidelberg: R. Asanger.Google Scholar
  9. Bovet, P., and J. Parnas. 1993. Schizophrenic delusions: A phenomenological approach. Schizophrenia Bulletin 19(3): 579–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bürgy, M. 2008. The concept of psychosis: Historical and phenomenological aspects. Schizophrenia Bulletin 34(6): 1200–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghaemi, S.N. 2007. Feeling and time: The phenomenology of mood disorders, depressive realism, and existential psychotherapy. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33(1): 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harland, R., C. Morgan, and G. Hutchinson. 2004. Phenomenology, science and the anthropology of the self: A new model for the aetiology of psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science 185: 361–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Husserl, E. 1984. Logische Untersuchungen II. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. XIX). Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  14. Jaspers, K. 1912. Die phänomenologische Forschungsrichtung in der Psychopathologie. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 9(1): 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaspers, K. 1913. Allgemeine Psychopathologie: ein Leitfaden für Studierende, Ärzte und Psychologen. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Jaspers, K. 1997. General Psychopathology Volume II. Trans. J. Hoenig and M. W. Hamilton. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lysaker, P.H., and J.T. Lysaker. 2010. Schizophrenia and alterations in self-experience: A comparison of 6 perspectives. Schizophrenia Bulletin 36(2): 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Minkowski, E. 2002. Phénoménologie et analyse existentielle en psychopathologie (1948). In Ecrits cliniques, 95–138. Ramonville-Saint-Agne: Erès.Google Scholar
  19. Mishara, A.L., and P. Fusar-Poli. 2013. The phenomenology and neurobiology of delusion formation during psychosis onset: Jaspers, Truman symptoms, and aberrant salience. Schizophrenia Bulletin 39(2): 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mullen, P.E. 2007. A modest proposal for another phenomenological approach to psychopathology. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33(1): 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nordgaard, J., L.A. Sass, and J. Parnas. 2013. The psychiatric interview: Validity, structure, and subjectivity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 263(4): 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parnas, J., and P. Bovet. 1995. Research in psychopathology: Epistemologic issues. Comprehensive Psychiatry 36(3): 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parnas, J., and P. Handest. 2003. Phenomenology of anomalous self-experience in early schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry 44(2): 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parnas, J., L.A. Sass, and D. Zahavi. 2013. Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object. Schizophrenia Bulletin 39(2): 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parnas, J., and D. Zahavi. 2002. The role of phenomenology in psychiatric diagnosis and classification. In Psychiatric diagnosis and classification, ed. M. Maj, W. Gaebel, J.-J. Lopez-Ibor, and N. Sartorius, 137–162. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sass, L.A., and J. Parnas. 2003. Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophrenia Bulletin 29(3): 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stanghellini, G. 2004. Disembodied spirits and deanimated bodies: The psychopathology of common sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stanghellini, G., D. Bolton, and W.K.M. Fulford. 2013. Person-centered psychopathology of schizophrenia: Building on Karl Jaspers’ understanding of patient’s attitude toward his illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin 39(2): 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uhlhaas, P.J., and A.L. Mishara. 2007. Perceptual anomalies in schizophrenia: Integrating phenomenology and cognitive neuroscience. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33(1): 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vogeley, K., and C. Kupke. 2007. Disturbances of time consciousness from a phenomenological and a neuroscientific perspective. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33(1): 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Interdisciplinary Researches in Human and Social Sciences (CRISES, EA 4424)Paul-Valéry UniversityMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatric Emergency and Acute CrisisLapeyronie HospitalMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations