Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 761–774 | Cite as

Quality in ethics consultations

  • Gerard Magill
Scientific Contribution


There is an increasing need for quality in ethics consultations, though there have been significant achievements in the United States and Europe. However, fundamental concerns that place the profession in jeopardy are discussed from the perspective of the U.S. in a manner that will be helpful for other countries. The descriptive component of the essay (the first two points) explains the achievements in ethics quality (illustrated by the IntegratedEthics program of the Veterans Health Administration) and the progress on standards and competencies for ethics consultations (represented by the Core Competencies of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities). Based on these achievements, the analytical component of the essay (the final three points) identifies and seeks to resolve three fundamental concerns (with increasing levels of importance) that compromise quality in ethics consultations: standards of quality; professionalism; and credentialing. The analysis argues for clearer standards of quality in ethics consultation and urges further professionalism by explaining the need for the following: interpreting the ASBH core competencies in a normative manner, developing a Code of Ethics, and clarifying the meaning of best practices. However, the most serious concern that threatens quality in ethics consultations is the lack of a credentialing process. This concern can be resolved effectively by developing an independent Ethics Consultation Accreditation Council to accredit and standardize graduate degree programs, fellowship experiences, and qualifying examinations. This credentialing process is indispensable if we are to strategically enhance quality in ethics consultations.


American Society for Bioethics and Humanities Code of ethics Core competencies and standards Credentialing Ethics consultation Ethics quality Healthcare ethics Integrated ethics Professionalism Quality improvement 


  1. Acres, C.A., et al. 2012. Credentialing the clinical ethics consultant: An academic medical center affirms professionalism and practice. Journal of Clinical Ethics 23(2): 156–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, D.M. 2013. Ethics expertise and moral authority: Is there a difference? American Journal of Bioethics 13(2): 27–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, M.D. 2011a. Consensus, clinical decision making, and unsettled cases. Journal of Clinical Ethics 22(4): 310–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, D.M. 2011b. The role of the clinical ethics consultant in “unsettled” cases. Journal of Clinical Ethics 22(4): 328–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams, D.M. 2009. Ethics consultation and “facilitated” consensus. Journal of Clinical Ethics 20(1): 44–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Altisent, R., et al. 2013. Health care ethics consultation. Individual consultant or committee model?: Pros and Cons. American Journal of Bioethics 13(2): 25–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2009). Improving competencies in clinical ethics consultation. An education guide. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.Google Scholar
  8. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 2011. Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultations, 2nd ed. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.Google Scholar
  9. Andereck, W.S., et al. 2012. The clinical ethics consultant: Verifying the qualifications of a new type of practitioner in a community hospital. Journal of Healthcare Management 57(4): 264–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Aulisio, M.P. 2011. Facilitated consensus, ethics facilitation, and unsettled cases. Journal of Clinical Ethics 22(4): 345–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Aulisio, M.P., et al. (eds.). 2003. Ethics consultation: From theory to practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Aulisio, M.P., et al. 2000. Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. Annals of Internal Medicine 133(1): 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baker, R. 2009. In defense of bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37(1): 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barry, R., et al. 2002. The six sigma book for healthcare. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  15. Belkin, G. 2013. Impact and accountability: Improvement as a competency challenges the purposes of bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 13(2): 14–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bishop, J., et al. 2009. Of goals and goods and floundering about: A dissensus report on clinical ethics consultations. HEC Forum 21(3): 275–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bogan, C.E., et al. 1994. Benchmarking for best practices. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Borovecki, A., et al. 2005. Ethics and the structure of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia. British Medical Journal 331(7510): 227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boxwell Jr, R.J. 1994. Benchmarking for competitive advantage. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Bramstedt, K.A., et al. 2009. Optimizing the documentation practice of an ethics consultation service. Journal of Medical Ethics 35(1): 47–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruce, C.R., et al. 2011. A systematic review of activities at a high-volume ethics consultation service. Journal of Clinical Ethics 22(2): 151–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Caminiti, C., et al. 2011. Current functions of Italian ethics committees: A cross-sectional study. Bioethics 25(4): 220–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carrese, J.A., et al. 2012. HCEC pearls and pitfalls: suggested Do’s and Don’t’s for healthcare ethics consultants. Journal of Clinical Ethics 23(3): 234–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chwang, E., et al. 2007. Views regarding the training of ethics consultants: a survey of physicians caring for patients in ICU. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(6): 320–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Childs, B.H. 2009. Credentialing clinical ethics consultants. HEC Forum 21(3): 231–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Courtwright, A. 2013. From unregulated practice to credentialed profession: Implementing ethics consultations competencies. American Journal of Bioethics 23(2): 16–17.Google Scholar
  27. Cranford, R.E., et al. 1984. The emergence of institutional ethics committees. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 12(1): 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cranford, R.E., et al. 1989. Institutional ethics committees and health care decision making. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  29. Cummins, D. 2002. The professional status of bioethics consultation. Theoretical Medicine 23(1): 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Donabedian, A. 1980. The definition of quality and approaches to its management. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dörries, A., et al. 2011. Institutional challenges for clinical ethics committees. HEC Forum 23(3): 193–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dörries, A., et al. 2010. Implementing clinical ethics in german hospitals. Journal of Medical Ethics 36(12): 721–726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dubler, N.N., et al. 2009. Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. Hastings Center Report 39: 23–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dubler, N.N., et al. 2007. Credentialing ethics consultants: An invitation to collaboration. American Journal of Bioethics 7(2): 35–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dubler, N.N., et al. 2004. Bioethics mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions. New York, NY: United Hospital Fund.Google Scholar
  36. DuVal, G., et al. 2004. A national survey of US internists’ experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. Journal of General Internal Medicine 19(3): 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Engelhardt Jr, H.Tristram. 2011. Core competencies for health care ethics consultants: In search of professional status in a post-modern world. HEC Forum 23(3): 129–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Engelhardt Jr, H.Tristram. 2009. Credentialing strategically ambiguous and heterogenous social skills: The emperor without clothes. HEC Forum 21(3): 293–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Farber Post, L. et al. 2007. Handbook for health care ethics committees. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Feister, A. 2013. Mediation and recommendations. American Journal of Bioethics 13(2): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Feister, A. 2012. Mediation and advocacy. American Journal of Bioethics 12(8): 10–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fletcher, J.C., et al. (eds.). 1989. Ethics consultation in health care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  43. Førde, R., and R. Pederson. 2011. Clinical ethics committees in Norway: What do they do and does it make a difference? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20(3): 389–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fournier, V., et al. 2009. Clinical ethics consultation in Europe: A comparative and ethical review of the role of patients. Clinical Ethics 4(3): 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fox, E., et al. 2007. Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics 7(2): 13–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fox, E., et al. (2010). IntegratedEthics: An innovative program to improve ethics quality in healthcare. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 15 (2), article 8: 1–36.Google Scholar
  47. Gefanus, E. 2011. Clinical ethics committee and ethics support infrastructure: A European perspective. Asian Bioethics Review 3(3): 293–298.Google Scholar
  48. Geppert, C.M., et al. 2012. A comparison of general medical and clinical ethics consultations: What can we learn from each other? Mayo Clinic Proceedings 87(4): 381–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Glasa, J. (ed.). 2000. Ethics committees in central & eastern Europe. Bratislava: Charis.Google Scholar
  50. Hernandez, R., et al. 2009. Harmonisation of ethics committees’ practice in 10 European countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 35(11): 696–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hester, D.M., et al. (eds.). 2012. Guidance for healthcare ethics committees. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hoffman, D.E., et al. 2000. Are ethics committee members competent to consult? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28(1): 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hurst, S.A., et al. 2007. Physicans’ access to ethics support services in four European countries. Health Care Analysis 15(4): 321–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Huxtable, R. 2012. Law and ethics at the end f life? In Reconceiving medical ethics, ed. Christopher Cowley, 175–188. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  55. Hynds, J. 2013. The core competencies: Addressing yesterday’s challenges? The American Journal of Bioethics 13(2): 22–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. In re Quinlan. Supreme Court of New Jersey. 355 A.2d 647 (N.J. 1976).Google Scholar
  57. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  58. Jonsen, A.R., et al. 2006. Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Keel, R. 2012. The benefits of practice standards and other practice-defining texts: And why healthcare ethicists ought to explore them. HEC Forum 24(3): 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kipnis, K. 2009. The certified clinical ethics consultant. HEC Forum 21(3): 249–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Magill G, et al (2004) ASBH task force report on ethics consultation liability, an ASBH commissioned report submitted to the ASBH Board, October 24, 2004.Google Scholar
  62. Menikoff, Jerry. 2001. Law and bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  63. McClimans, L., et al. 2012. Can UK clinical ethics committees improve quality of care? HEC Forum 24(2): 139–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McGee, G., et al. 2001. A national study of ethics committees. American Journal of Bioethics 1(4): 60–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McGee, G., et al. 2002. Successes and failures of hospital ethics committees: A national survey of ethics committee chairs. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11(2): 87–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McLaughlin, C.P., et al. 2005. Continuous quality improvement in health care: Theory, implementation, and applications, 3rd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  67. McLaughlin, C.P., et al. 2012. Implementing continuous quality improvement in health care. A Global casebook. Burlington, Mass: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  68. McLean, S.A.M. 2007. What and who are clinical ethics committees for? Journal of Medical Ethics 33(9): 497–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Meulenbergs, T., et al. 2005. The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committee in Belgium. Journal of Medical Ethics 31(6): 318–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Newson, A., et al. 2009. The role of patients in European clinical ethics consultation. Clinical Ethics 4(3): 109–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nietzke, G. 2009. Patient involvement in clinical ethics services: From access to participation and membership. Clinical Ethics 4(3): 146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nilson, E.G., et al. 2008. Clinical ethics and the quality initiative: A pilot study for the empirical evaluation of ethics case consultation. American Journal of Medical Quality 23(5): 356–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Opel, D.J., et al. 2009. Integrating ethics and patient safety: The role of clinical ethics consultants in quality improvement. Journal of Clinical Ethics 20(3): 220–226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Orr, R.D., et al. 2009. A process and format for clinical ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics 20(1): 79–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Pederson, R., et al. 2010. The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations. Clinical Ethics 5(3): 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pfäfflin, M., et al. 2009. Evaluating clinical ethics consultation: A European perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18: 406–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rasmussen, L.M. 2011. An ethics expertise for clinical ethics consultation. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39(4): 649–691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reiter-Theil, S. 2009. Dealing with the normative dimension in clinical ethics consultation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18(4): 347–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Repenshek, Mark. 2012. Continuous quality improvement initiatives in ethics: A proposed communication tool. Health Care Ethics USA 20(4): 2–12.Google Scholar
  80. Schiedermayer, D., et al. 2012. Credentialing and certification in ethics consultation: Lessons from palliative care. Journal of Clinical Ethics 23(2): 172–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Schneiderman, L.J., et al. 2003. Effect of ethics consultation on non-beneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 290(9): 1166–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Self, D.J., et al. 1993. A comparison of the moral reasoning of physicians and clinical medical ethicists. Academic Medicine 68(11): 840–855.Google Scholar
  83. Silverman, H.J., et al. 2013. Ensuring quality in clinical ethics consultations: Perspectives of ethicists regarding process and prior training of consultants. American Journal of Bioethics 13(2): 29–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Slowther, A., et al. 2012. Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: A national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics 38(4): 210–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Slowther, A. 2008. Embedding clinical ethics in a health care system: The experience of the UK clinical ethics network. Bioethica Forum 1(1): 40–44.Google Scholar
  86. Smith, M., et al. 2010. Toward competency-based certification of clinical ethics consultants. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 21(1): 14–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Sokol, D.K. 2012. Doing clinical ethics: A hands-on guide for clinicians and others. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sollecito, W.A., et al. 2013. McLaughlin and Kalunzny’s continuous quality improvement in health care, 4th ed. Burlington, Mass: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  89. Spike, J.P. 2009. Resolving the vexing question of credentialing: Finding the aristotelian mean. HEC Forum 21(3): 263–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Steinkamp, N., et al. 2007. Regulation of healthcare ethics committees in Europe. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10(4): 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Swetz, K.M., et al. 2007. Report on 255 clinical ethics consultations and review of the literature. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 82(6): 686–691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Tarzian, A.J. 2013. Health care ethics consultation: An update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities’ core competencies update task force. American Journal of Bioethics 13(2): 3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tarzian, A.J. 2009. Credentials for clinical ethics consultation. HEC Forum 21(3): 241–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. The Joint Commission. 2011. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: The official handbook. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission.Google Scholar
  95. Thomasma, D.C. 1991. Why philosophers should offer ethics consultations. Theoretical Medicine 12: 129–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Veterans Health Administration, National Center for Ethics in Health Care. (2008). IntegratedEthics, Improving Ethics Quality in Health Care. At,

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Healthcare EthicsDuquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations