Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 807–816 | Cite as

E-care as craftsmanship: virtuous work, skilled engagement, and information technology in health care

Scientific Contribution


Contemporary health care relies on electronic devices. These technologies are not ethically neutral but change the practice of care. In light of Sennett’s work and that of other thinkers (Dewey, Dreyfus, Borgmann) one worry is that “e-care”—care by means of new information and communication technologies—does not promote skilful and careful engagement with patients and hence is neither conducive to the quality of care nor to the virtues of the care worker. Attending to the kinds of knowledge involved in care work and their moral significance, this paper explores what “craftsmanship” means in the context of medicine and health care and discusses whether today the care giver’s craftsmanship is eroded. It is argued that this is a real danger, especially under modern conditions and in the case of telecare, but that whether it happens, and to what extent it happens, depends on whether in a specific practice and given a specific technology e-carers can develop the know-how and skill to engage more intensely with those under their care and to cooperate with their co-workers.


Health care Medicine E-care Ethics Virtue Knowledge Information technology Craftsmanship Skill Know-how Work Telecare Cybermedicine 


  1. Aristotle. 2000. Nicomachean ethics (trans: Crisp, R.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, Keith. 2004. Cybermedicine and the moral integrity of the physician–patient relationship. Ethics and Information Technology 6(2): 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benner, Patricia. 2004. Using the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe and interpret skill acquisition and clinical judgment in nursing practice and education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24(3): 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benner, Patricia, Molly Sutphen, Victoria Leonard, and Lisa Day. 2010. Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, Wilfred. 2006. Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education 40(4): 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Dreyfus, Stuart E., and Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1980. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in direct skill acquisition. Report. Berkeley, CA: Operations Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart E. Dreyfus. 1991. Towards a phenomenology of ethical expertise. Human Studies 14(4): 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreyfus, Hubert. (2001). On the internet, revised 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, Hubert, and Sean Dorrance Kelly. 2011. All things shining. Reading the western classics to find meaning in a secular age. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Essén, Anna. 2008. Technology as an extension of the human body: Exploring the potential role of technology in an elderly home care setting. Dissertation. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology and other essays (trans: Lovitt, W.), 3–35. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  14. Kiran, Asle H., and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2010. Trusting our selves to technology. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23(3–4): 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After virtue, 3rd ed, 2007. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  16. Onor, M.L., and S. Misan. 2005. The clinical interview and the doctor–patient relationship in telemedicine. Telemedicine and e-Health 11(1): 102–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pols, Jeannette. 2010. The hearth of the matter: About good nursing and telecare. Heath Care Analysis 18(4): 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pols, Jeannette. 2012. Care at a distance: On the closeness of technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, Celia, Maggie Mort, and Milligan Christine. 2012. Calling for care: “Disembodied” work, teleoperators and older people living at home. Sociology 46(3): 490–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sennett, Richard. 2012. Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of co-operation. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sennett, Richard. 2008. The craftsman. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sennett, Richard. 1998. The corrosion of character: The personal consequences in the new capitalism. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  23. Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience, 1993. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Varela, Francisco J. 1999. Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Yakhlef, Ali, and Essén, Anna. 2012. Practice innovation as bodily skills: The example of elderly home care service delivery. Organization (published on-line before print Sept 21, 2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations