Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland
- 259 Downloads
A hallmark of good antenatal care is to respect prospective parent’s choices and provide information in a way that encourages their autonomy and informed decision making. In this paper, we analyse the meaning of autonomous and informed decision making from the theoretical perspective and attempt to show how those concepts are described among prospective parents in early pregnancy and in the public media in a society where NT screening is almost a norm. We use interviews with Icelandic prospective parents in early pregnancy (N = 40) and material covering the discourse around prenatal screening in the media over 5 years period. Our analysis indicates that both prospective parents and the public media include ethical terms in their rhetoric around prenatal screening although those concepts differ in their expression. We conclude that the context in which these decisions are taken does not encourage moral reflection. Prospective parents describe that there is a lack of dialogue with professionals when decisions are made about screening. With routine offer of screening the conceptualization of bioethical concepts finds its own way through a mainstream discourse which has limited connections to the theoretical notions. This has been neglected in the implementation of screening, as limited effort has been subject to audit with reference to explore how the offer of screening and informed choice is experienced among prospective parents.
KeywordsFetal screening Autonomy Informed decision Prospective parents Ethics Experience
- Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Coulter, A. 2006. Trends in patients experience of the NHS. Oxford: Picker Institute Europe.Google Scholar
- Directorate of Health. 2006. Medgönguvernd heilbrigdra kvenna í edlilegri medgöngu. Klíniskar leiðbeiningar [Antenatal care in normal pregnancy. Clinical guidelines]. Retrieved 11 Jan. http://landlaeknir.is/Uploads/File-Gallery/Klininskar%20leidbeiningar/Medgonguvernd_KL_-nov.2006.pdf.
- Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Gottfreðsdóttir, H., and K. Björnsdóttir. 2010. Have you had the test? A discourse analysis of media presentation of prenatal screening in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 24 (in press).Google Scholar
- Hasman, A., A. Coulter, and J. Askham. 2006. Education for partnership: Developments in medical education. Oxford: Picker Institute Europe. Also available from http://www.pickereurope.org/Filestore/PIE_reports/project_reports/E4P_report_19-5-06-_with_cover.pdf.pdf.
- Katz, J. 1984. The silent world of doctor and patient. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Kerr, A. 2004. Genetics and society: A sociology of disease. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kristinsson, S., and V. Árnason. 2007. Informed consent and human genetic database research. In The ethics and governance of human genetic databases. European perspectives, ed. M. Häyry, R. Chadwick, V. Árnason, and G. Árnason, 199–216. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- McLeod, C. 2002. Self-trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [NICE]. 2008. NICE clinical guideline 62. Antenatal care: Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. London: Author. Retrieved 10 April 2008 from http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG062NICEguideline.pdf.
- Petersen, A., and R. Bunton. 2002. The new genetics and the public’s health. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rapp, R. 2000. Testing the women, testing the fetus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Regulation on Health Care Centres no. 787/2007. [Reglugerð um heilsugæslustöðvar nr. 787/2007].Google Scholar
- Ritchie, J., and J. Lewis. 2003. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. 2006. Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Smith, S. 1981. Three models of the nurse-patient relationship. In Biomedical ethics, ed. T.A. Mappes, and J.S. Zembaty, 120–126. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Veatch, R.M. 1981. Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age. In Biomedical ethics, ed. T.A. Mappes, and J.S. Zembaty, 56–59. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Williams, C., P. Alderson, and B. Farsides. 2002. Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing? Social Science and Medicine 54: 17–25.Google Scholar