Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 23–30 | Cite as

‘Missing persons’: technical terminology as a barrier in psychiatry

Review Article


Several fields contributing to psychiatric advances, such as psychology, biology, and the humanities, have not yet met to produce a cohesive and integrated picture of human function and dysfunction, strength and vulnerability, etc., despite advances in their own areas. The failure may have its roots in a disagreement on what we mean by the human person and his or her relationship with the world, for which the incommensurate language of these disciplines may be partly to blame. Turns taken by western philosophy over the past 400 years may help to explain this. Language is such an important tool for psychiatrists, that examination of it may afford an insight into the reasons for divisions in the field. This paper aims to examine and compare psychologies (and hence psychiatries) derived from modern western philosophy, with similar concepts in other cultures, through the study of developments in terminology, in terms of the simplest facts about what it means to be human. Terminology used in mental health in western cultures is examined, with particular consideration of the term “self” as it has come to be used in a technical sense. Analogous terms from non-English speaking European languages, and some non-western cultures are studied. Western philosophy and psychology have evolved a meaning for the term “self” which is quite different from equivalent terms in non-western cultures. It is a moot point whether or not the development in western psychiatry of what are now technical terms to describe normal human experience has become needlessly obscure and ambiguous. It is not evident that this “new” language represents a genuine advance in understanding; it distances mental health professionals from those who are not familiar with it; and it makes transcultural dialogue difficult.


Psychological theory Terminology Medical philosophy Humanities 



The help of Meng Ren, Dr. Pat Gorevan, and Dr. Nishas Shirsat is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of interest



  1. Alarcon, R.D., J. Westermeyer, E.F. Foulks, and P. Ruiz. 1999. Clinical relevance of contemporary cultural psychiatry. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 187(8): 465–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Berrios, G.E. 1999. Towards a new descriptive psychopathology: A sine qua non for neurobiological research in psychiatry. Brain Research Bulletin 50(5–6): 457–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bharati, A. 1985. Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives. In The self in Hindu thought and action, ed. A. Marsella, G. DeVos, and L. Hsu, 186–187. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  5. Burkitt, I. 1991. Social selves. Theories of the social formation of personality. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Eynon, T. 2002. Cognitive linguistics. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 8(6): 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gergen, K. 1985. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40(3): 260–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghaemi, S. 2003. The concepts of psychiatry: A pluralistic approach to the mind and mental illness. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hacking, I. 1986. Reconstructing Individualism. In Making up people, ed. T. Heller, M. Sosna, and D. Wellbery, 221–236. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, D., & Ames, R. (1998). Chinese philosophy, from
  11. Littlewood, R. 1991. Against pathology. The new psychiatry and its critics. British Journal of Psychiatry 159: 696–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mauss, M. (1979). Sociology and psychology: Essays (trans: Brewster, B.). London, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Maxmen, J. 1985. New psychiatry: How modern psychiatrists think about their patients. Theories, diagnoses, drugs, psychotherapies, power, training, families and private lives. New York: William Morrow & Company Inc.Google Scholar
  14. McHugh, P.R. 1987. William Osler and the new psychiatry. Annals of Internal Medicine 107(6): 914–918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Moncrieff, J. (1997). Psychiatric imperialism: The medicalisation of modern living, from
  16. Oxford Engliah Dictionary (2005a). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Oxford Engliah Dictionary (2005b). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rizzolatti, G., and L. Fadiga. 1998. Grasping objects and grasping action meanings: The dual role of monkey rostroventral premotor cortex (area F5). London: Paper presented at the Novartis Foundation Symposium.Google Scholar
  19. Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schweder, R., and E. Bourne. 1982a. Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy. In Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally?, 1st ed, ed. A. Marsella, and G. White, 129. Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  21. Schweder, R., and E. Bourne. 1982b. Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy. In Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally?, 1st ed, ed. A. Marsella, and G. White, 130. Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  22. Sims, A. 1999. Symptoms in the mind, 2nd ed. London: Saunders.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, C. 1991. The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Timimi, S. 2005. Effect of globalisation on children’s mental health. British Medical Journal 331(7507): 37–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van Os, J., and P. McGuffin. 2003. Can the social environment cause schizophrenia? British Journal of Psychiatry 182: 291–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walsh, D. 1990. After ideology: Recovering the spiritual foundations of freedom. San Francisco: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  27. Wei-Ming, T. 1985. Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives. In Selfhood and otherness in Confucian thought, ed. A. Marsella, G. DeVos, and L. Hsu, 232. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  28. Wittgenstein, L. 1999. Philosophical investigations, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barringtons HospitalLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations