Abstract
Several fields contributing to psychiatric advances, such as psychology, biology, and the humanities, have not yet met to produce a cohesive and integrated picture of human function and dysfunction, strength and vulnerability, etc., despite advances in their own areas. The failure may have its roots in a disagreement on what we mean by the human person and his or her relationship with the world, for which the incommensurate language of these disciplines may be partly to blame. Turns taken by western philosophy over the past 400 years may help to explain this. Language is such an important tool for psychiatrists, that examination of it may afford an insight into the reasons for divisions in the field. This paper aims to examine and compare psychologies (and hence psychiatries) derived from modern western philosophy, with similar concepts in other cultures, through the study of developments in terminology, in terms of the simplest facts about what it means to be human. Terminology used in mental health in western cultures is examined, with particular consideration of the term “self” as it has come to be used in a technical sense. Analogous terms from non-English speaking European languages, and some non-western cultures are studied. Western philosophy and psychology have evolved a meaning for the term “self” which is quite different from equivalent terms in non-western cultures. It is a moot point whether or not the development in western psychiatry of what are now technical terms to describe normal human experience has become needlessly obscure and ambiguous. It is not evident that this “new” language represents a genuine advance in understanding; it distances mental health professionals from those who are not familiar with it; and it makes transcultural dialogue difficult.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alarcon, R.D., J. Westermeyer, E.F. Foulks, and P. Ruiz. 1999. Clinical relevance of contemporary cultural psychiatry. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 187(8): 465–471.
Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Berrios, G.E. 1999. Towards a new descriptive psychopathology: A sine qua non for neurobiological research in psychiatry. Brain Research Bulletin 50(5–6): 457–458.
Bharati, A. 1985. Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives. In The self in Hindu thought and action, ed. A. Marsella, G. DeVos, and L. Hsu, 186–187. London: Tavistock.
Burkitt, I. 1991. Social selves. Theories of the social formation of personality. London: Sage.
Eynon, T. 2002. Cognitive linguistics. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 8(6): 399–407.
Gergen, K. 1985. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40(3): 260–275.
Ghaemi, S. 2003. The concepts of psychiatry: A pluralistic approach to the mind and mental illness. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hacking, I. 1986. Reconstructing Individualism. In Making up people, ed. T. Heller, M. Sosna, and D. Wellbery, 221–236. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Hall, D., & Ames, R. (1998). Chinese philosophy, from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/G001SECT5.
Littlewood, R. 1991. Against pathology. The new psychiatry and its critics. British Journal of Psychiatry 159: 696–702.
Mauss, M. (1979). Sociology and psychology: Essays (trans: Brewster, B.). London, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Maxmen, J. 1985. New psychiatry: How modern psychiatrists think about their patients. Theories, diagnoses, drugs, psychotherapies, power, training, families and private lives. New York: William Morrow & Company Inc.
McHugh, P.R. 1987. William Osler and the new psychiatry. Annals of Internal Medicine 107(6): 914–918.
Moncrieff, J. (1997). Psychiatric imperialism: The medicalisation of modern living, from http://www.critpsynet.freeuk.com/sound.htm.
Oxford Engliah Dictionary (2005a). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oxford Engliah Dictionary (2005b). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzolatti, G., and L. Fadiga. 1998. Grasping objects and grasping action meanings: The dual role of monkey rostroventral premotor cortex (area F5). London: Paper presented at the Novartis Foundation Symposium.
Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schweder, R., and E. Bourne. 1982a. Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy. In Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally?, 1st ed, ed. A. Marsella, and G. White, 129. Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel.
Schweder, R., and E. Bourne. 1982b. Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy. In Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally?, 1st ed, ed. A. Marsella, and G. White, 130. Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel.
Sims, A. 1999. Symptoms in the mind, 2nd ed. London: Saunders.
Taylor, C. 1991. The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Timimi, S. 2005. Effect of globalisation on children’s mental health. British Medical Journal 331(7507): 37–39.
van Os, J., and P. McGuffin. 2003. Can the social environment cause schizophrenia? British Journal of Psychiatry 182: 291–292.
Walsh, D. 1990. After ideology: Recovering the spiritual foundations of freedom. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
Wei-Ming, T. 1985. Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives. In Selfhood and otherness in Confucian thought, ed. A. Marsella, G. DeVos, and L. Hsu, 232. London: Tavistock.
Wittgenstein, L. 1999. Philosophical investigations, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Acknowledgments
The help of Meng Ren, Dr. Pat Gorevan, and Dr. Nishas Shirsat is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke, C. ‘Missing persons’: technical terminology as a barrier in psychiatry. Med Health Care and Philos 15, 23–30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9287-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9287-7