Cancer and the computerized family: towards a clinical ethics of “indirect” Internet use

  • Christian Simon
  • Sarah Schramm
Scientific Contribution


The normative dimensions of Internet use among patients and their families have not been studied in much depth in the field of clinical ethics. This study considers cancer-related Internet use among families and friends of cancer patients, and how that use of the Internet may affect patients and patient care. Interviews were conducted with 120 cancer patients, most of whom (76%) reported that family, friends, and others in their social network used the Internet in some way related to the patient’s cancer. Many patients (73%) did not request this online help from their social networks, yet found it helpful and comforting nonetheless. Other patients were less positive about the helpfulness of the online efforts of friends and relatives. A significant proportion of patients (39%) also felt that the online information they received was prescreened or edited in some way. Very few patients recalled that their clinicians ever discussed these and other issues with them. The study illustrates that indirect Internet use is a central feature of the cancer experience. In contrast to other literature in this area, the study suggests that indirect Internet use may have normatively positive and negative implications for patients. These implications point towards the importance of studying and understanding indirect Internet use—and Internet use in general—in the field of clinical ethics.


Autonomy Cancer Ethics Information technology Internet 



This study is part of a larger project being conducted with the support of a National Cancer Institute (NCI/NIH) Career Development Award (CA108457) and an American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant (IRG-91-022-12).


  1. Ammenwerth, E., and N. Shaw. 2005. Bad health informatics can kill–is evaluation the answer? Methods of Information in Medicine 44 (1): 1–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aroskar, M. 1980. Anatomy of an ethical dilemma: The theory. American Journal of Nursing 80 (4): 661–663.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass, S. et al. 2006. Relationship of Internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: Experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute’s cancer information service. Journal of Health Communication 22 (3): 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, K. 2002. Using the Internet to empower patients and to develop partnerships with clinicians. World Hospitals and Health Services 38 (2): 2–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyer, K.A. 2001. Ethical challenges of medicine and health on the Internet: A review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 3 (2): e23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans, R. et al. 2004. Making interactive decision support for patients a reality. Informatics in Primary Care 12 (2): 109–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eysenbach, G. 2003. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 53 (6): 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franzen, A. 2000. Does the Internet make us lonely? European Sociological Review 16 (4): 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helft, P. et al. 2003. American oncologists’ views of Internet use by cancer patients: A mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. Journal of Clinical Oncology 21 (5): 942–947.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirschning, S. et al. 2006. Internet use by the families of cancer patients—help for disease management? Journal of Public Health 15 (1): 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nie, N., and D. Hillygus. 2002. The impact of Internet use on sociability: Time-diary findings. IT & Society 1 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
  12. Paasche-Orlow, M., and D. Roter. 2003. The communication patterns of internal medicine and family practice physicians. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 16 (6): 485–493.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Parker, M., and J. Gray. 2001. What is the role of clinical ethics support in the era of e-medicine? Journal of Medical Ethics 27: i33–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Robinson, T.N. et al. 1998. An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: A challenge to medicine in the information age. JAMA 280 (14): 1264–1269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Spooner, T. 2003. Internet use by region in the United States. Retrieved 11/4/2007, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BioethicsCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations