Abstract
A moral problem arises when a patient refuses a treatment that would save her life. Should the patient be treated against her will? According to an influential approach to questions of biomedical ethics, certain considerations pertaining to individual autonomy provide a solution to this problem. According to this approach, we should respect the patient’s autonomy and, since she has made an autonomous decision against accepting the treatment, she should not be treated. This article argues against the view that our answer to the question of whether or not the refusing patient ought to be treated should be based on these kinds of considerations pertaining to individual autonomy and maintains that finding a plausible answer to this question presupposes that we resolve questions concerning subjectivity and objectivity of individual wellbeing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.J. Arneson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Human Flourishing Versus Desire Satisfaction’ Social Philosophy and Policy 16 IssueID1 113–142 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0265052500002272
T.L. Beauchamp J.F. Childress (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics Oxford University Press New York
M. Bernstein (1998) ArticleTitle‘Wellbeing’ American Philosophical Quarterly 35 IssueID1 39–55
R.B. Brandt (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right Clarendon Press Oxford
A.E. Buchanan D.W. Brock (1989) Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making Cambridge University Press New York
R. Crisp (1990) ArticleTitle‘Medical Negligence, Assault, Informed Consent, and Autonomy’ Journal of Law and Society 17 IssueID1 77–89
N. Daniels (1979) ArticleTitle‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics’ Journal of Philosophy 76 IssueID5 256–282
J. Finnis (1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights Clarendon Press Oxford
R. Gillon (2003) ArticleTitle‘Ethics Needs Principles – Four Can Encompass the Rest – and Respect for Autonomy Should Be “First Among Equals”’ Journal of Medical Ethics 29 IssueID5 307–312 Occurrence Handle10.1136/jme.29.5.307 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svlvVCgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14519842
S.M. Glick (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Morality of Coercion’ Journal of Medical Ethics 26 IssueID5 393–396 Occurrence Handle10.1136/jme.26.5.393 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgsFGgtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11055045
J. Glover (1981) Causing Death and Saving Lives Penguin Books Harmondsworth
H.A. Gylling (2004) ArticleTitle‘Autonomy Revisited’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 41–46 Occurrence Handle15045914
J. Harris (2003) ArticleTitle‘Consent and End of Life Decisions’ Journal of Medical Ethics 29 IssueID1 10–15 Occurrence Handle10.1136/jme.29.1.10 Occurrence Handle12569187
L. Haworth (1986) Autonomy: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology and Ethics Yale University Press New Haven CT
T.A. Mappes J.S. Zembaty (1991) Biomedical Ethics McGraw-Hill Inc New York
E. Matthews (2000) ArticleTitle‘Autonomy and the Psychiatric Patient’ Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 IssueID1 59–70 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-5930.00140 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fjs1KisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11758594
R. Nozick (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia Basic Books New York
M.A.L. Oshana (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Autonomy Bogeyman’ The Journal of Value Inquiry 35 209–226 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010345019890
M.A.L. Oshana (1998) ArticleTitle‘Personal Autonomy and Society’ Journal of Social Philosophy 29 IssueID1 81–102 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-9833.1998.tb00098.x
D. Parfit (1984) Reasons and Persons Clarendon Press Oxford
J. Rawls (1971) A Theory of Justice Harvard University Press Cambridge, MT
B. Secker (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Appearance of Kant’s Deontology in Contemporary Kantianism: Concepts of Patient Autonomy in Bioethics’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 IssueID1 43–66 Occurrence Handle10.1076/jmep.24.1.43.2544 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jsl2msQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10223442
L.W. Sumner (1996) Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics Clarendon Press Oxford
G. Thomson (1987) Needs Routledge and Kegan Paul London
R.M. Veatch (2000) ArticleTitle‘Doctor Does Not Know Best: Why in the New Century Physicians Must Stop Trying to Benefit Patients’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 IssueID6 701–721 Occurrence Handle10.1076/jmep.25.6.701.6126 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mt1Ciug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11262633
S. Wolf (1990) Freedom Within Reason Oxford University Press New York