Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 357–369 | Cite as

The Conflation of Competence and Capacity in English Medical Law: A Philosophical Critique

Scientific Contribution


Ethical and legal discourse pertaining to the ability to consent to treatment and research in England operates within a dualist framework of “competence” and “capacity”. This is confusing, as while there exists in England two possible senses of legal capacity – “first person” legal capacity and “delegable” legal capacity, currently neither is formulated to bear a necessary relationship with decision-making competence. Notwithstanding this, judges and academic commentators frequently invoke competence to consent in discussions involving the validity of offering or withholding consent as a synonym for legal capacity to consent. I argue that this gives rise to a conflation, jeopardising clarity and consistency in law. This is somewhat less problematic in instances of “first-person” legal capacity that are heavily informed by criteria for decision-making competence than in the second sense of legal capacity, which is qualitatively different from decision-making competence, or with first-person legal capacity when defined in different terms from competence. The paper concludes by proposing that the soundest resolution to this problem is by making decision-making competence a necessary and sufficient condition of first-person legal capacity, affording a more scrupulous distinction between the two different forms of legal capacity that exist.


consent decision-making competence delegable legal capacity English law first-person legal capacity legal capacity mental capacity task specific competence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alderson, P. 1990Children’s Consent to SurgeryOpen University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, P., Roth, L., Lidz, C. 1982“The Therapeutic Misconception: Informed Consent in Psychiatric Research’International Journal of Law and Psychiatry5319329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgarten, E. 1980“The Concept of Competence in Medical Ethics’Journal of Medical Ethics6180184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauchamp, T.L. 1991“Competence”Cutter, M.A.Shelp, E.E. eds. Competency: A Study of Informal Competency Determinations in Primary CareKluwerDordrecht4977Google Scholar
  5. Berg, J.W., Appelbaum, P.S., Grisso, T. 1996“Constructing Competence: Formulating Standards of Legal Competence To Make Medical Decisions”Rutgers Law Review48345396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, J.W., Appelbaum, P.S. 1999“Subjects’ Capacity to Consent to Neurobiological Research’Pincus, H.A.Lieberman, J.Ferris, S. eds. Ethics In Psychiatric Research: A Resource Manual for Human Subjects ProtectionAmerican Psychiatric PublishingWashington D.C81106Google Scholar
  7. Beyleveld, D. 1991The Dialectical Necessity of Morality: An Analysis and Defense of Alan Gewirth’s Argument to the Principle of Generic ConsistencyThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyleveld, D., Brownsword, R. 1994Law As A Moral JudgmentSheffield Academic PressSheffieldGoogle Scholar
  9. Beyleveld, D., Brownsword, R. 2001Human Dignity in Bioethics and BiolawOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyleveld, D., Pattinson, S. 2000“Precautionary Reasoning as a Link to Moral Action”Boylan, M. eds. Medical EthicsPrentice-HallUpper Saddle River, NJ3953Google Scholar
  11. Brazier, M. 1991“Competence, Consent and Proxy Consents”Brazier, M.Lobjoit, M. eds. Protecting the Vulnerable: Autonomy and Consent in Health CareRoutledgeLondon3451Google Scholar
  12. British Medical Association and The Law Society2004Assessment of Mental Capacity: Guidance for Doctors and LawyersBMJ PublishingLondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchanan, A.E., Brock, D.W. 1989Deciding for others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision-MakingCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Culver, C.M., Gert, B. 1982Philosophy in Medicine: Conceptual and Ethical Issues in Medicine and PsychiatryOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Dekkers, W.J.M. 2001“Autonomy and Dependence: Chronic Physical Illness and Decision-Making Capacity”Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy4185192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drane, J.F. 1985“The Many Faces of Competency”Hastings Center Report151721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gewirth, A. 1978Reason and MoralityThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P.S. 1995“The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study, III: Abilities of Patients to Consent to Psychiatric and Medical Treatments”Law and Human Behavior19149174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P.S. 1998Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health ProfessionalsOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunn, M.J. 1994“The Meaning of Incapacity”Medical Law Review2824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunn, M.J., Wong, J.G., Clare, I.C.H., Holland, A.J. 1999“Decision-Making Capacity”Medical Law Review7269306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hohfeld W.N. (1923) reissued 2001, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied In Judicial Reasoning, D. Campbell, P. Thomas, N.E. Simmonds (eds.) London: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, P. 1994RightsPalgraveBasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennedy, I., Grubb, A. 2000Medical Law3ButterworthsLondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Law Commission of England and Wales (1991) Mental Incapacitated Adults and Decision-Making: An Overview, Consultation Paper 119. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  26. Law Commission of England and Wales (1993) Mentally Incapacitated Adults and Decision-Making: Medical Treatment and Research, Consultation Paper 129. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  27. Law Commission of England and Wales (1995) Mental Incapacity, Report 231. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  28. Levine, R.J. 1988Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research2Yale University PressNew HavenGoogle Scholar
  29. MacCormick, N. 1994Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, revised editionClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason, J.K., McCall-Smith, R.A., Laurie, G.T. 2002Law and Medical Ethics6ButterworthsLondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Melton, G.B., Koocher, G.P., Saks, M.J. 1983Children’s Competence to ConsentPlenumNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Mill, J.S. (1859) reissued 1991, On Liberty and Other Essays (edited with an introduction and notes by J. Gray). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Morreim, E.H. 1983“Three Concepts of Patient Competence”Theoretical Medicine4231251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Morreim, E.H. 1991“Competence: at the Intersection of Law, Medicine and Philosophy”Cutter, M.A.Shelp, E.E. eds. Competency: A Study of Informal Competency Determinations in Primary CareKluwerDordrecht93125Google Scholar
  35. Ondrusek, N., Abramovitch, R., Pencharz, P., Koren, G. 1998“Empirical Examination of the Ability of Children to Consent to Medical Research”Journal of Medical Ethics24158165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rendorff, J.D. 2002“Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability – Towards a Foundation of Bioethics and Biolaw”Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy5235244Google Scholar
  37. Roth, L.H., Meisel, A., Lidz, C.W. 1977“Tests of Competency to Consent to Treatment”American Journal of Psychiatry134279284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan, J.O.A., Jones, D.P.H. 2001“Children’s Consent”Current Opinion in Psychiatry14303307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United Kingdom Department for Constitutional Affairs2003Draft Mental Incapacity Bill, Cm 5859HMSOLondonGoogle Scholar
  40. United Kingdom Department of Health2001Good Practice in Consent Implementation Guide: Consent to Examination or TreatmentDepartment of HealthLondonGoogle Scholar
  41. United Kingdom Lord Chancellor’s Department1999Making Decisions: Government Proposals for Making Decisions on behalf of Mentally Incapacitated Adults, Cm 4465HMSOLondonGoogle Scholar
  42. United Kingdom Parliament, House of Commons2004Mental Capacity Bill (Bill 1, 53/4)The Stationery OfficeLondonGoogle Scholar
  43. United Kingdom Parliament, House of Commons (2004) Explanatory Notes on the Mental Capacity Bill (EN-1) London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  44. Vanderpool, H.Y. 1991“The Competency of Definitions of Competency”Cutter, M.A.Shelp, E.E. eds. Competency: A Study of Informal Competency Determinations in Primary CareKluwerDordrecht197209Google Scholar
  45. Weithorn, L.A., Campbell, S.B. 1982“The Competency of Children and Adolescents to make Informed Consent Treatment Decisions”Child Development5315891598PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Welie, J.V.M., Welie, S.P.K. 2001“Patient Decision Making Competence: Outlines of A Conceptual Analysis”Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy4127138Google Scholar
  47. White, B.C. 1994Competence to ConsentGeorgetown University PressWashington, D.C.Google Scholar
  48. Wicclair, M. 1991“Patient Decision-Making Capacity and Risk”Bioethics587104Google Scholar
  49. Wilks, I. 1997“The Debate Over Risk-Related Standards of Competence”Bioethics11413426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilks, I. 1999“Asymmetrical Competence”Bioethics13154159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law School and Institute for Applied EthicsThe University of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations