Skip to main content
Log in

Use of the Concept of Measurement Uncertainty in Applied Problems of Metrology

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Problems related to the use of the concept of measurement uncertainty in different types of metrological problems, such as calibration, type evaluation, and the verification of measuring instruments are considered. A classification of risks in the assessment of the correspondence of measuring instruments to specific requirements is presented. Examples of conformity decision rules used in verification of measuring instruments are presented and the role of measurement uncertainty in these rules is demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISO, Geneva (1993).

  2. JCGM 101:2008, Evaluation of Measurement Data. Suppl. 1 to Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Propagation of Distribution Using a Monte Carlo Method.

  3. JCGM 102:2011, Evaluation of Measurement Data. Suppl.2 to Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Extension to Any Number of Output Quantities.

  4. N. Yu. Efremova and A. G. Chunovkina, “Development of the concept of ‘measurement uncertainty’ and review of Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Part 1. Causes and probability-theoretic foundations of review,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 4, 9–14 (2016).

  5. N. Yu. Efremova and A. G. Chunovkina, “Development of the concept of ‘measurement uncertainty’ and review of Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Part 2. Comparative analysis of fundamental assumptions of Handbook and their planned changes,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 5, 7–11 (2016).

  6. JCGM 106:2011, Evaluation of Measurement Data. The Role of Measurement Uncertainty in Conformity Assessment Decisions.

  7. OIML G 19:2017, The Role of Measurement Uncertainty in Conformity Assessment Decisions in Legal Metrology.

  8. ISO/IEC 17025:2005, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.

  9. OIML R 111-1:2004, Weights of Classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M1–2, M2, M2–3, and M3. Part 1: Metrological and Technical Requirements.

  10. EA-4/02 M:2013, Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration.

  11. OIML R 76-1:2006, Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments. Part 1: Metrological and Technical Requirements. Tests.

  12. Guidelines on the Calibration of Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments, EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 18, version 4.0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Yu. Efremova.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 4, pp. 13–18, April, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Efremova, N.Y. Use of the Concept of Measurement Uncertainty in Applied Problems of Metrology. Meas Tech 61, 335–341 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-018-1430-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-018-1430-5

Keywords

Navigation