Advertisement

Measurement Techniques

, Volume 60, Issue 10, pp 1064–1070 | Cite as

International Comparisons of Standards in the Area of Fiber-Optic Communication and Information Transmission Systems

  • A. I. Glazov
  • V. V. Grigor’ev
  • V. E. Kravtsov
  • A. K. Mityurev
  • A. B. Svetlichnyi
  • K. B. Savkin
  • S. V. Tikhomirov
INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION
  • 19 Downloads

The results of international comparisons in the field of fiber-optic communication and information transmission systems, in particular, for the average power of optical radiation (COOMET PR-S6 and APMP PR-S2 projects) and chromatic dispersion in an optical fiber (EURAMET PR-S3 project), are considered. Data on comparisons as regards the length of the optical fiber (APMP PR-S8), polarization mode dispersion (COOMET PR-S9 project), and wavelength for fiber optics (COOMET PR-S8 project), all of which are now being performed, are presented.

Keywords

fiber-optic systems standards international comparisons optical fiber 

References

  1. 1.
    A. I. Glazov, V. V. Grigor’ev, V. S. Ivanov, et al., “Standard base of VNIIOFI in the area of fiber-optic information transmission systems,” Foton-Ekspress, No. 8 (128), 18–25 (2015).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Glazov, V. Grigoriev, V. Kravtsov, et al., “Standards intercomparisons in the field of fibre optics with VNIIOFI participation,” in: Measurement in Research and Industry: XXI IMEKO World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic (2015).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. V. Tikhomirov, A. I. Glazov, M. L. Kozatchenko, et al., “Comparison of reference standards for measurements of optical-fibre power,” Metrologia, No. 37, 347–348 (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. K. Kim, D. H. Lee, and S. N. Park, “On APMP supplementary comparison on fiber optic responsivity,” Metrologia, No. 52, Tech. Suppl. 02002 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Svetlichny, V. Kravtsov, S. Kueck, et al., “Final report on COOMET supplementary comparison on fiber optic power responsivity COOMET.PR-S6, 2012, 2014,” Metrologiya, No. 51, Tech. Suppl. 02003 (2014).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Report for Intercomparison Results Between METAS and VNIIOFI, Aug. 23–27, 2010, METAS, Berne, Switzerland (2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. V. Grigor’ev, V. E. Kravtsov, A. K. Mityurev, et al., “State Primary Special Standard of the unit of polarization mode dispersion in an optical fiber,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 2, 3–6 (2012).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. V. Grigor’ev, V. Ye. Kravtsov, A. K. Mityurev, et al., “State Primary Special Standard of the unit of chromatic dispersion in an optical fiber,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 1, 3–6 (2012).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Morel, V. Kravtsov, and V. Grigoriev, “Final report on EURAMET.PR S3: Bilaterial intercomparison of measurements of chromatic dispersion reference fibres between METAS and VNIIOFI,” Metrologia, No. 50, Tech. Suppl. 02001 (2013).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Grigor’ev, V. E. Kravtsov, A. K. Mityurev, and S. V. Tikhomirov, “Summaries of bilateral comparisons of standard equipment for measurements of chromatic dispersion in an optical fiber,” Foton-Ekspress, No. 6 (110), 291–292 (2013).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. I. Glazov
    • 1
  • V. V. Grigor’ev
    • 1
  • V. E. Kravtsov
    • 1
  • A. K. Mityurev
    • 1
  • A. B. Svetlichnyi
    • 1
  • K. B. Savkin
    • 1
  • S. V. Tikhomirov
    • 1
  1. 1.All-Russia Research Institute of Optophysical Measurements (VNIIOFI)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations