Measurement Techniques

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 599–604 | Cite as

On independence, exchangeability, and logical correlation of random variables in metrology

  • W. Wöger

Information about the set of input quantities to a measurement model comprises statements about correlation of the random variables associated with the quantities. In a Bayesian framework, underlying internationally agreed evaluation procedures applied to measurement data, the correlation coefficients, or equivalently the covariances, of a joint probability density function, PDF, are fixed and calculable parameters. It will be shown that correlation often is due to logical inference and not necessarily expresses physical cause and effect. A Bayesian understanding of measurements under repeatability conditions is presented, finally leading to the replacement of (complete) independence within the sequence of random variables generating the observations with a conditional independence, which means a hidden correlation of the random variables in the sequence. The concept of an exchangeable joint PDF is introduced to briefly discuss the relation of measurements under repeatability conditions to de Finetti’s purely mathematical General Representation Theorem that, moreover, calls for a Bayesian approach.


Bayesian Approach Calibration Factor Repeatability Condition Joint Probability Density Function Logical Inference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Useful discussions with Tyler Estler, retired from NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, United States of America, and Clemens Elster, PTB Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany, are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    E. T. Jaynes, Probability Theory: The Logic of Science, Cambridge University Press (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. T. Jaynes, “Clearing up mysteries – the original goal,” in: Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods, J. Skilling (ed.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (1989), p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. M. Bernardo, A. F. M. Smith, Bayesian Theory, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. P. Dawid, “Conditional independence in statistical theory,” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 41, 1–31 (1979).MathSciNetADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. de Finetti, Theory of Probability, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester (1974), Vol. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physikalisch-Technische BundesanstaltBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations