Measurement Techniques

, Volume 54, Issue 10, pp 1203–1212 | Cite as

On certain information capabilities of analytical instruments

  • M. A. Karabegov

Current problems of modern analytical instrument design are considered


physicochemical methods dynamic characteristics invariance metrological characteristics analytical instruments 


  1. 1.
    M. F. Brodskii, S. A. Popkov, and V. A. Rylov, “Plant for preparation of liquid samples with specified content of dissolved gas,” Pribory, No. 9, 41–43 (2009).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO 44–1999, Hydraulic Drives. Liquids. Method of Encoding the Degree of Contamination with Solid Particles [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NAS 1638, Cleanliness Requirements of Parts Used in Hydraulic Systems, Aerospace Industries of America, Washington, D.C. (2011).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    GOST 17216–2001, Industrial Cleanliness. Classes of Purity of Liquids [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MEK 296, Specification for Fresh Oil-Based Insulation Oils for Transformers and Switches [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Karabegov, “Particle size fraction monitoring of dispersion liquids,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 7, 67–72 (2008); Measur. Techn., 51, No. 7, 802–809 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. V. Lvov, “The evolution of electrothermic atomic-absorption spectrometry and the development of the theory of solid-phase thermal decomposition. How it happened,” in: Analytical Chemists Speak of Themselves and of Their Science [in Russian], Editet by Yu. A. Zolotov and V. A. Shaposhnik, Librokom, Moscow (2011).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu. M. Sadagov et al., “Electrothermic atomic-absorption spectrometry: from cell to rapidly heated furnaces with ballast,” Metrologiya, No. 9, 25–45 (2007).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. D. Levin et al., “Problems of procedure support of biomedical nanotechnologies,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 8, 29–34 (2010); Measur. Techn., 53, No. 8, 869–877 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. A. Karabegov, “Automatic differential prism refractometer for monitoring process liquids,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 31–37 (2007); Measur. Techn., 50, No. 6, 619–628 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. A. Karabegov, “Ways of improving the accuracy of analytical instruments,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 4, 54–59 (2009); Measur. Techn., 52, No. 4, 416–423 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. A. Karabegov, “Some metrological problems of analytical measurements,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 1, 62–67 (2009); Measur. Techn., 52, No. 1, 97–104 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scientific and Production Association Central Research Institute of Machine Building Technology (NPO TsNIITmash)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations