Analytical estimates of the error for the standard and differential methods for indirect measurements of the difference in the flow rates of a heat carrier are presented. The areas in which the use of each of the methods is preferable are limited.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. G. Lupei, “The rules for metering heat energy and for measuring mass difference,” Commercial Metering of Heat Carriers: Proc. 22nd Conf., St. Petersburg (2005).
A. G. Lupei, “A comparison of the results of direct and indirect measurements of the amount of water required to meet the needs of a hot water supply,” Commercial Metering of Heat Carriers: Proc, 13th Conf., St. Petersburg (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 9, pp. 45–49, September, 2012.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chipulis, V.P. A comparative estimate of two indirect methods of measuring the difference in the flow rates of a heat carrier. Meas Tech 55, 1061–1067 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-012-0075-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-012-0075-z