Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of uncertainty estimates in international metrological and ecological guides

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Abstract

Comparisons have been made on the international ecological guidelines CORINAIR, IPCC, and the GHG Protocol, which implement evaluation of the uncertainties in pollution discharges to the atmosphere, greenhouse gases, and metrological guidelines on estimating the uncertainty of GUM measurements. The main sources of uncertainty are identified and their values are estimated together with their contribution to the general uncertainty in the estimation of greenhouse gas discharges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evolving Needs for Metrology in Trade, Industry, Society and the Role of the BIPM: A Report Prepared by the CIPM for the Governments of the Member States of the Metre Convention, BIPM, France (2003).

  2. Joint EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook, 3rd Edition, EEA, Copenhagen (2003).

  3. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 1, No. 3, IPCC/OECD/IEA, revised (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. IPCC Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, IPCC, Switzerland (2000).

  5. Greenhouse Gas Protocol Guidance on Uncertainty Assessment in GHG Inventories and Calculating Statistical Parameter Uncertainty, Business Council for Sustainable Development/World Resources Institute (2003).

  6. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/

  7. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1st Edition, ISO, Switzerland (1993).

  8. O. Velychko and T. Gordiyenko, “Metrology and measurement education in the Internet era,” Joint Intern. IMEKO TC1+TC7 Symp., Ilmenau, Germany (2005), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. M. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, Standartizatsiya, Sertifikatsiya, Yakist’, No. 4, 36 (2005).

  10. O. N. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, “Measurement uncertainties: Standardized, scientific, methodological, and industrial aspects UM-2005),” Abstracts for the 2nd Technical Seminar [in Russian], KhNURE, Kharkov (2005), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. N. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, “Mathematical, statistical, and computer support to measurement quality,” Abstracts for the International Technical Seminar [in Russian], St. Petersburg (2006), p. 130.

  12. T. Gordiyenko and O. Velychko, Intern. Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement (AMUEM 2006), Sardagna, Trento, Italy (2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. EURACHEM/CITAC: Guide QUAM-P1:2000: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement.

  14. O. N. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, Data Processing Systems, Vol. 7(56), Kharkov (2006), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 5, pp. 22–26, May, 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velichko, O.N., Gordienko, T.B. Comparison of uncertainty estimates in international metrological and ecological guides. Meas Tech 50, 490–495 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-007-0098-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-007-0098-z

Key words

Navigation