Measurement Techniques

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 490–495 | Cite as

Comparison of uncertainty estimates in international metrological and ecological guides

  • O. N. Velichko
  • T. B. Gordienko


Comparisons have been made on the international ecological guidelines CORINAIR, IPCC, and the GHG Protocol, which implement evaluation of the uncertainties in pollution discharges to the atmosphere, greenhouse gases, and metrological guidelines on estimating the uncertainty of GUM measurements. The main sources of uncertainty are identified and their values are estimated together with their contribution to the general uncertainty in the estimation of greenhouse gas discharges.

Key words

uncertainty estimation metrological and ecological guidelines uncertainty sources 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Evolving Needs for Metrology in Trade, Industry, Society and the Role of the BIPM: A Report Prepared by the CIPM for the Governments of the Member States of the Metre Convention, BIPM, France (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joint EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook, 3rd Edition, EEA, Copenhagen (2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 1, No. 3, IPCC/OECD/IEA, revised (1996).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    IPCC Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, IPCC, Switzerland (2000).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenhouse Gas Protocol Guidance on Uncertainty Assessment in GHG Inventories and Calculating Statistical Parameter Uncertainty, Business Council for Sustainable Development/World Resources Institute (2003).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1st Edition, ISO, Switzerland (1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Velychko and T. Gordiyenko, “Metrology and measurement education in the Internet era,” Joint Intern. IMEKO TC1+TC7 Symp., Ilmenau, Germany (2005), p. 124.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. M. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, Standartizatsiya, Sertifikatsiya, Yakist’, No. 4, 36 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. N. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, “Measurement uncertainties: Standardized, scientific, methodological, and industrial aspects UM-2005),” Abstracts for the 2nd Technical Seminar [in Russian], KhNURE, Kharkov (2005), p. 9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. N. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, “Mathematical, statistical, and computer support to measurement quality,” Abstracts for the International Technical Seminar [in Russian], St. Petersburg (2006), p. 130.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Gordiyenko and O. Velychko, Intern. Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement (AMUEM 2006), Sardagna, Trento, Italy (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    EURACHEM/CITAC: Guide QUAM-P1:2000: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. N. Velichko and T. B. Gordienko, Data Processing Systems, Vol. 7(56), Kharkov (2006), p. 13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. N. Velichko
    • 1
  • T. B. Gordienko
    • 1
  1. 1.Ukrmetrteststandart, State Consumer Standards Agency of UkraineUkraine

Personalised recommendations