Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 45–59 | Cite as

Vulnerability and resilience: a critical nexus

  • Mianna Lotz
Article

Abstract

Not all forms of human fragility or vulnerability are unavoidable. Sometimes we knowingly and intentionally impose conditions of vulnerability on others; and sometimes we knowingly and intentionally enter into and assume conditions of vulnerability for ourselves (for example, when we decide to trust or forgive, enter into intimate relationships with others, become a parent, become a subject of medical or psychotherapeutic treatment, and the like). In this article, I propose a presently overlooked basis on which one might evaluate whether the imposition or assumption of vulnerability is acceptable, and on which one might ground a significant class of vulnerability-related obligations. Distinct from existing accounts of the importance of promoting autonomy in conditions of vulnerability, this article offers a preliminary exploration of the nature, role, and importance of resilience promotion, its relationship to autonomy promotion, and its prospects for improving human wellbeing in autonomy inhibiting conditions.

Keywords

Vulnerability Resilience Autonomy Moral obligation 

References

  1. 1.
    Kittay, E.F. 1995. Taking dependency seriously: the Family Medical Leave Act considered in light of the social organization of dependency work and gender equality. Hypatia 10(1): 8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kittay, E.F. 1997. Human dependency and Rawlsian equality. In Feminists rethink the self, ed. D.T. Meyers, 219–266. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: a reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war: when is life grievable?. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fineman, M.A. 2008. The vulnerable subject: anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1(20): 1–23.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fineman, M.A. 2010. The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal 60: 251–275.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers, W., C. Mackenzie, and S. Dodds. 2012. Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5(2): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackenzie, C., W. Rogers, and S. Dodds. 2014. Introduction. In Vulnerability: new essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers, and S. Dodds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Russell, J.S. 2015. Resilience. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 42(2): 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harper, D., and W. Speed. 2012. Uncovering recovery: the resistible rise of recovery and resilience. Studies in Social Justice 6(1): 9–25.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ho, S.M.Y. 2011. Resilience, growth, and distress after a traumatic experience. In Healing trauma: a professional guide, ed. K.K. Wu, C.S. Tang, and E.Y. Leung. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robertson, I., and C.L. Cooper. 2013. Editorial: resilience. Stress and Health 29: 175–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Youssef, C., and F. Luthans. 2007. Positive organizational behavior in the workplace. Journal of Management 33: 774–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haglund, M.E., P.S. Nestadt, N.S. Cooper, S.M. Southwick, and D.S. Charney. 2007. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience: relevance to prevention and treatment of stress-related psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology 19: 889–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robertson, I., and Cooper, C.L. 2015. I-Resilience tool. http://www.robertsoncooper.com/iresilience. Accessed April 8, 2015.
  17. 17.
    Lyons, D.M., and K.J. Parker. 2007. Stress inoculation-induced indications of resilience in monkeys. Journal of Traumatic Stress 20(4): 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meichenbaum, D. 1993. Stress inoculation training: a twenty year update. In Principles and practices of stress management, 2nd ed, ed. R.L. Woolfolk, and P.M. Lehrer, 373–406. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seery, M.D., E.A. Holman, and R.C. Silver. 2010. Whatever does not kill us: cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability, and resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99: 1025–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neff, L.A., and E.F. Broady. 2011. Stress resilience in early marriage: can practice make perfect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(5): 1050–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schnurr, P.P., S.D. Rosenberg, and M.J. Friedman. 1993. Change in MMPI scores from college to adulthood as a function of military service. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 102: 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Masten, A.S., and M.J. Reed. 2002. Resilience in development. In Handbook of positive psychology, ed. C.R. Snyder, and S.J. Lopez. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gunnar, M.R., K. Frenn, S.S. Wewerka, and M.J. van Ryzin. 2009. Moderate versus severe early life stress: associations with stress reactivity and regulation in 10–12-year-old children. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34: 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DiCorcia, J.A., and E. Tronick. 2011. Quotidian resilience: exploring mechanisms that drive resilience from a perspective of everyday stress and coping. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 35: 1593–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seery, M.D., R.J. Leo, S.P. Lupien, C.L. Kondrak, and J.L. Almonte. 2013. An upside to adversity? Moderate cumulative lifetime adversity is associated with resilient responses in the face of controlled stressors. Psychological Science 24: 1181–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hughes, V. 2012. The roots of resilience. Nature 11(490): 165–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirsch, P., C. Esslinger, Q. Chen, et al. 2005. Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 25(49): 11489–11493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morgan III, C.A., S. Southwick, G. Hazlett, et al. 2000. Plasma neuropeptide-Y concentrations in humans exposed to military survival training. Biological Psychiatry 47(10): 902–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Binder, E.B., R.G. Bradley, W. Liu, et al. 2008. Association of FKBP5 polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults. Journal of American Medical Association 299(11): 1291–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ponder, C.A., C.L. Kliethermes, M.R. Drew, et al. 2007. Selection for contextual fear conditioning affects anxiety-like behaviors and gene expression. Genes Brain and Behaviour 6: 736–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cooper, C.L., J. Flint-Taylor, and M. Pearn. 2014. Building Resilience for Success. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anderson, J. 2014. Vulnerability and autonomy entwined. In Vulnerability: new essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers, and S. Dodds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dodds, S. 2014. Dependency, care and vulnerability. In Vulnerability: new essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers, and S. Dodds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Howell, A., and J. Voronka. 2012. Introduction: the politics of resilience and recovery in mental health care. Studies in Social Justice 6(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smail, D. 2004. Psychotherapy and the making of subjectivity. In Between Psychotherapy and Philosophy, ed. P. Gordon, and R. Mayo. London & Philadelphia: Whurr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Building W6AMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations