Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 101–115 | Cite as

Is there a duty to remain in ignorance?



Questions about information inform many debates in bioethics. One of the reasons for this is that at least some level of information is taken by many to be a prerequisite of valid consent. For others, autonomy in the widest sense presupposes information, because one cannot be in control of one’s life without at least some insight into what it could turn out to contain. Yet not everyone shares this view, and there is a debate about whether or not there is a right to remain in ignorance of one’s medical, and especially genetic, information. It is notable, though, that this debate leaves unexamined the assumption that, if a person wants information, he is entitled to it. This paper examines the assumption, specifically in relation to genetics, where learning facts about oneself may reveal facts about other people, particularly one’s close relatives. This may be taken as a violation of their privacy, and since privacy is something that we normally think should be respected, it is worth asking whether one ought to abjure the opportunity to obtain genetic information for the sake of privacy. In effect, there may be an argument to be made not just for a right to remain in ignorance, but for a duty to do so.


Genetic information Privacy Autonomy Duties Rights 


  1. 1.
    Peake, Mervyn. 1999. Titus Groan. Vol. 1 of The Gormenghast Trilogy. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris, John, and Kirsty Keywood. 2001. Ignorance, information and autonomy. Theoretical Medicine 22: 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takala, Tuija. 2001. Genetic ignorance and reasonable paternalism. Theoretical Medicine 22: 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takala, Tuija, and Heta Aleksandra Gylling. 2000. Who should know about our genetic makeup and why? Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asscher, Eva, and Bert-Japp Koops. 2010. The right not to know and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington’s disease. Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parker, Michael. 2001. Genetics and the interpersonal elaboration of ethics. Theoretical Medicine 22: 451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sommerville, Ann, and Veronica English. 1999. Genetic privacy: Orthodoxy or oxymoron? Journal of Medical Ethics 25: 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSEP/iSEI, School of LawUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations