Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 5–17 | Cite as

False positives in psychiatric diagnosis: implications for human freedom

  • Jerome C. Wakefield
Article

Abstract

Current symptom-based DSM and ICD diagnostic criteria for mental disorders are prone to yielding false positives because they ignore the context of symptoms. This is often seen as a benign flaw because problems of living and emotional suffering, even if not true disorders, may benefit from support and treatment. However, diagnosis of a disorder in our society has many ramifications not only for treatment choice but for broader social reactions to the diagnosed individual. In particular, mental disorders impose a sick role on individuals and place a burden upon them to change; thus, disorders decrease the level of respect and acceptance generally accorded to those with even annoying normal variations in traits and features. Thus, minimizing false positives is important to a pluralistic society. The harmful dysfunction analysis of disorder is used to diagnose the sources of likely false positives, and propose potential remedies to the current weaknesses in the validity of diagnostic criteria.

Keywords

Psychiatric diagnosis Misdiagnosis False positive diagnosis DSM Harmful dysfunction Ethics Evolutionary psychology Justice Function Philosophy of psychiatry 

References

  1. 1.
    Spitzer, Robert L., and Jerome C. Wakefield. 1999. DSM-IV diagnostic criterion for clinical significance: Does it help solve the false positives problem? American Journal of Psychiatry 156: 1856–1864.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization. 1994. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th ed. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kessler, Ronald C., Katherine A. McGonagle, Shanyang Zhao, Christopher B. Nelson, Michael Hughes, Suzann Eshleman, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, and Kenneth S. Kendler. 1994. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry 51: 8–19.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kessler, Ronald C., Patricia Berglund, Olga Demler, Robert Jin, and Ellen E. Walters. 2005. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62: 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kessler, Ronald C., and T. Bedirhan Üstun. 2004. The World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 13: 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horwitz, Allan V., and Jerome C. Wakefield. 2009. Should screening for depression among children and adolescents be demedicalized? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 48: 683–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1992. The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 47: 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1999. Evolutionary versus prototype analyses of the concept of disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108: 374–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klerman, Gerald, and G. Schecher. 1981. Ethical aspects of drug treatment. In Psychiatric ethics, ed. Sidney Bloch and Paul Chodoff, 117–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1988. Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work: I. Distributive justice as a conceptual framework for social work. Social Service Review 62: 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1988. Psychotherapy, distributive justice, and social work: II. Psychotherapy and the pursuit of justice. Social Service Review 62: 353–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaillant, George E. 2003. Mental health. American Journal of Psychiatry 160: 1373–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 2005. Vaillant on positive mental health. [In Italian.] Psicoterapia E Scienze Umane 39: 91–96.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horwitz, Allan V., and Jerome C. Wakefield. 2007. The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garb, Howard N. 1999. Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1992. Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III-R’s definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review 99: 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1993. Limits of operationalization: A critique of Spitzer and Endicott’s (1978) proposed operational criteria for mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 102: 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1999. Disorder as a black box essentialist concept. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108: 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wakefield, Jerome C. 2006. The concept of mental disorder: Diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry 6: 149–156.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wakefield, Jerome C., Kathleen J. Pottick, and Stuart A. Kirk. 2002. Should the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder consider social context? American Journal of Psychiatry 159: 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wakefield, Jerome C., Stuart A. Kirk, Kathleen J. Pottick, Xin Tian, and Derek K. Hsieh. 2006. The lay concept of conduct disorder: Do non-professionals use syndromal symptoms or internal dysfunction to distinguish disorder from delinquency? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 51: 210–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Silver School of Social Work and Department of PsychiatryNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations