Advertisement

A Two-Dimensional Theory of Health

  • Per-Anders Tengland
Article

Abstract

The starting point for the contemporary debate about theories of health should be the holistic theory of Lennart Nordenfelt, claims George Khushf, not the refuted theory of Christopher Boorse. The present paper is an attempt to challenge Nordenfelt and to present an alternative theory to his and other theories, including Boorse’s. The main problems with Nordenfelt’s theory are that it is relativistic, that it leads to counter-intuitive results as to what goals can count as healthy, that it focuses on the wrong kind of abilities, that it makes measuring health extra difficult, and that it does not give us a sufficient account of health, at most a necessary one. The alternative theory proposed is two-dimensional. First, health is to have developed the abilities and dispositions that members of one’s culture typically develop, and be able to use them, in acceptable circumstances; and second, health is to experience positive moods and sensations, the kinds that have internal causes. The theory solves the problems attached to Nordenfelt’s theory by not being individual relativistic, by eliminating the goals in the definition, by giving an alternative interpretation of “ability,” by making health easier to measure, and by adding the dimension of well-being that, together with health as ability, not only gives us a necessary, but also a sufficient, account of health.

Keywords

Ability basic ability environment goals health holistic theory suffering well-being 

References

  1. Boorse C. On the Distinction Between Disease and Illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1975): 49–68.Google Scholar
  2. Boorse C. What a Theory of Mental Health Should Be Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 6 (1976): 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boorse C. Health as a Theoretical Concept Philosophy of Science 44 (1977): 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boorse, C. “A Rebuttal on Health In What Is Disease?” Edited by J. Humber and R.␣Almeder. 3–34 (Totowa, NJ: Humeana Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  5. Bowling A. Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. Brülde B. Vad är hälsa? Några reflektioner kring hälsobegreppet. [What is Health? Some Reflections about the Concept of Health] Göteborg: Filosofiska institutionen, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Brülde B. On How to Define the Concept of Health: A Loose Comparative Approach Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2000): 305–308.Google Scholar
  8. Brülde B. More on the Looser Comparative Approach to Defining ‘Health’: A Reply to Nordenfelt’s Reply Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2000): 313–315.Google Scholar
  9. Brülde B., P-A.Tengland. Hälsa och Sjukdom: En begreppslig utredning [Health and Illness: A Conceptual Investigation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2003. .Google Scholar
  10. Canguilhem G. On the Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. Cannon W. Wisdom of the Body. New York: Norton, 1932.Google Scholar
  12. Culver C. M., B. Gert. Philosophy in Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Dubos R. Mirage of Health: Utopias, Progress, and Biological Change. New York: Harper and Row, 1959. .Google Scholar
  14. Freud S. Orientering i Psykoanalysen [Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Fulford K. W. M. Moral Theory and Medical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. Khushf, G. “What Is at Issue in the Debate about Concepts of Health and Disease? Framing the Problem of Demarcation for a Post-Positivist Era of Medicine.” In Health, Science, and Ordinary Language. Edited by L. Nordenfelt. 123–69 (Amsterdam: Rodopi Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  17. Khushf G. An Agenda for Future Debate on Concepts of Health and Disease Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10, no. 1 (2007): 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lilienfeld S.I., L. Marino. Mental Disorder as a Roschian Concept: A Critique of Wakefield’s ‘Harmful Dysfunction’ AnalysisJournal of Abnormal Psychology 104, no.3 (1995): 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDowell I, C. Newell. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford U P, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy D., R.L. Woolfolk. The Harmful Dysfunction Analysis of Mental Disorder Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 7, no. 4 (2000): 241–252.Google Scholar
  21. Murphy D., R.L. Woolfolk. Conceptual Analysis versus Scientific Understanding: An Assessment of Wakefield’s Folk Psychiatry Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 7, no. 4 (2000): 271–93.Google Scholar
  22. Nordenfelt L. Quality of Life, Health and Happiness. Avebury, Aldershot, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. Nordenfelt L. On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach, Second revised edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Nordenfelt, L. “On Ability, Opportunity and Competence: An Inquiry into People’s Possibility for Action In Contemporary Action Theory, Vol. I.” Edited by G.␣Holmström-Hintikka and E. Toumela. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. Nordenfelt L. Health, Science and Ordinary Language. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. Nordenfelt, L. “On the Evolutionary Concept of Health: Health as Natural Function In Dimensions of Health and Health Promotion.” Edited by L. Nordenfelt and P-E.␣Liss. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  27. Pestana M. Moral Virtue or Mental Health. Peter Lang Press, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  28. Pörn, I. “An Equilibrium Model of Health In Health, Disease and Causal Explanations in Medicine.” Edited by I. Lindahl and L. Nordenfelt. 3– (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984).Google Scholar
  29. Pörn I. Health and Adaptedness Theoretical Medicine 14 (1993): 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seedhouse D. Health. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.Google Scholar
  31. Tengland P-A. Mental Health: A Philosophical Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
  32. Tengland, P-A. Social hälsa, vad för slags hälsa är det?” [“Social Health: What Kind of Health is that?] In Hälsans sociala villkor [The Social Conditions for Health]. Edited by I. Kolfjord and L. Widding-Hedin.Lund: Bokbox Förlag, 2004.Google Scholar
  33. Tengland P-A. The Goals of Health Work: Quality of Life, Health and Welfare Philosophy, Medicine and Health Care: A European Journal 9, no. 2 (2006): 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wakefield J.C. The Concept of Mental Disorder: On the Boundary Between Biological Facts and Social Values American Psychologist 4, no. 3 (1992): 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wakefield J.C. Evolutionary Versus Prototype Analyses of the Concept of Disorder Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108 (1999): 374–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitbeck, C. “A Theory of Health in Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives.” Edited by S.L. Caplan, H.T. Engelhardt and J.J. McCartney. 611–26 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1981).Google Scholar
  37. WHO. Official Records of the World Health Organization, 2 (1948): 100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health and SocietyMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations