In the debate regarding the moral status of human embryos, the Embryo Rescue Case has been used to suggest that embryos are not rightholders. This case is premised on the idea that in a situation where one has a choice between saving some number of embryos or a child, it seems wrong to save the embryos and not the child. If so, it seems that embryos cannot be rightholders. In this paper, I argue that the Embryo Rescue Case does not independently show that embryos are not rightholders.
Keywordsembryo moral status persons potentiality rights time-relative interest
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Annas, G. “A French Homunculus in a Tennessee Court.” Hastings Center Report 19, 6. (1989): 20–22.Google Scholar
- Liao, S. Matthew. “Virtually all Human Beings as Rightholders: A Non-Speciesist Approach.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
- McMahan, J. 2002The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of LifeOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
- Sandel, M. 2005“The Ethical Implications of Human Cloning”Perspectives in Biology and Medicine4824147Google Scholar