Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 329–365 | Cite as

Autonomy gone awry: a cross-cultural study of parents’ experiences in neonatal intensive care units

  • Kristina Orfali
  • Elisa Gordon


This paper examines parents’ experiences of medical decision-making and coping with having a critically ill baby in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) from a cross-cultural perspective (France vs. U.S.A.). Though parents’ experiences in the NICU were very similar despite cultural and institutional differences, each system addresses their needs in a different way. Interviews with parents show that French parents expressed overall higher satisfaction with the care of their babies and were better able to cope with the loss of their child than American parents. Central to the French parents’ perception of autonomy and their sense of satisfaction were the strong doctor–patient relationship, the emphasis on medical certainty in prognosis versus uncertainty in the American context, and the “sentimental work" provided by the team. The American setting, characterized by respect for parental autonomy, did not necessarily translate into full parental involvement in decision-making, and it limited the rapport between doctors and parents to the extent of parental isolation. This empirical comparative approach fosters a much-needed critique of philosophical principles by underscoring, from the parents’ perspective, the lack of “emotional work" involved in the practice of autonomy in the American unit compared to the paternalistic European context. Beyond theoretical and ethical arguments, we must reconsider the practice of autonomy in particularly stressful situations by providing more specific means to cope, translating the impersonal language of “rights" and decision-making into trusting, caring relationships, and sharing the responsibility for making tragic choices.

autonomy cross-cultural experience France Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) parental decision-making paternalism U.S. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anspach, R. Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive Care Nursery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Beaufils, F. and Bourillon. “L'e´ laboration d'une de´ cision d'ordre e´ thique en re´ animation pe´ diatrique. “Supple´ ment special, “Ethique et re´ animation du nouveau-ne´ et de l'enfant. “Archives Franc¸ aises de Pe´diatrie 43(1986): 571–574.Google Scholar
  3. Beaufils, F., V. Denizart, and M. Meric. “La de´ cision d'arrê t the´ rapeutique en re´ animation ne´ onatale. Rô le des familles et de l'e´ quipe soignante”. Annales me´dicales de Nancy et de l'Est, nume´ ro spe´ cial sur Les de´ cisions d'arrê t the´ rapeutique en re´ animation (adultes et nouveaux ne´ s). Journe´ es d'e´ thique me´ dicale, Abbaye des Pre´ montre´ s, Pont à Mousson 21–22 (juin 1991, 1992): 355–357.Google Scholar
  4. Benfield, D. G., S. A. Leib, and J. H. Vollman. “Grief Response of Parents to Neonatal Death and Parents Participation in Deciding Care. “Pediatrics 62(1978): 71–177.Google Scholar
  5. Bursztajn, H. J., R. I. Feinbloom, R. M. Hamm, A. Brodsky, and H. Putnam. Medical Choices, Medical Chances: How Patients, Families and Physicians Cope with Medical Uncertainty. New York: Delacorte Press/Seymour Laurence, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Caplan, A. and C. B. Cohen, eds. “Imperiled Newborns. “Hastings Center Review 17 (1987): 5–32.Google Scholar
  7. Cassell, E. J. “Informed Consent in Therapeutic Relationship. ”In Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Edited by W. T. Reich. 767–770. New York: Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Cousins, N. Anatomy of an Illness. New York: Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Cuttini, M., M. Kaminski, R. Sarraci, and U. de Vonderweid. “The EURONIC Project: A European Concerted Action on Information to Parents and Ethical Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care. “Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 11 (1997): 461–474.Google Scholar
  11. Cuttini, M., M. Reblagiato, P. Bortoli, G. Hansen, R. de Leeuw, S. Lenoir, J. Persson, M. E. Reid, M. Schroell, U. de Vonderweid, M. Kaminski, H. G. Lenard, M. Orzalesi, and R. Saracci. “Parental Visiting, Communication, and Participation in Ethical Decisions: A Comparison of Neonatal Unit Policies in Europe. “Archives of Diseases in Childhood, Fetal and Neonatal Edition 81(1999): F84–F91.Google Scholar
  12. Cuttini, M., M. Nadai, M. Kaminski, G. Hansen, R. de Leeuw, S. Lenoir, J. Persson, M. Reblagiato, M. E. Reid, U. de Vonderweid, H. G. Lenard, M. Orzalesi, and R. Saracci. “End-of-life Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care: Physician's Self Reported Practices in Seven European Countries. “Lancet 355(2000): 2112–2118.Google Scholar
  13. Cuttini, M., EURONIC Study Group. “The European Union Collaborative Project on Ethical Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care (EURONIC): Findings from 11 Countries. “The Journal of Clinical Ethics 12(2001): 290–296.Google Scholar
  14. Dehan, M. “Introduction'’ In Archives Franc¸ aises de Pe´diatrie 43 supple´ ment spe´ cial “Ethique et re´ animation du nouveau-ne´ et de l'enfant” (1986): 543–544.Google Scholar
  15. Dehan, M. “L'e´ thique et sa Pratique en Ne´ onatologie. ”In Philosophie, e´thique et droit de la me´decine. Edited by D. Folscheid, B. Feuillet-Le Mintier et J. –F. 375–390. Mattei. Paris: PUF, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. De Leeuw, R., M. Cuttini, M. Nadai, I. Berbik, G. Hansen, A. Kucinskas, S. Lenoir, A. Levin, J. Person, M. Rebagliato, M. Reid, M. Scroel, U. de Vonderweid, and other members of the EURONIC group. “Treatment Choices for Extremely Preterm Infants: An International Perspective. “The Journal of Pediatrics 37 (2000): 608–615.Google Scholar
  17. Dubet, F. Sociologie de l'expe´rience. Seuil: Paris, 1994.Google Scholar
  18. Duff, R. S., and A. G. M. Campbell. “Moral and Ethical Dilemmas in the Special Care Nursery. “New England Journal of Medicine 289(1973): 890–894.Google Scholar
  19. Englehardt, H. T. “Ethical Issues in Aiding the Death of Young Children. ”In Beneficient Euthanasia. Edited by M. Kohl. 180–192, New York: Prometheus Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  20. Fedson, A. “Mechanical Reproduction: Neonatal Intensive Care, Medical Ethics, and the Technology Imperative. “Ph. D. diss., University of Chicago, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrand, E., A. C. Bachoud-Levi, M. Rodrigues, S. Maggiore, C. Brun-Buisson, and F. Lemaire. “Decision Making Capacity and Surrogate Designation in French ICU Patients. “Intensive Care Medicine 27(2001): 1360–1364.Google Scholar
  22. Ferrand, E., R. Robert, P. Ingrand, and F. Lemaire, French LATAREA Group. “Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support in Intensive-Care Units in France: A Prospective Survey. “French LATAREA Group. Lancet 357(2001): 9–14.Google Scholar
  23. Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  24. Fost, N. “Ethics in Pediatric Care. ”In Textbook of Pediatrics, 15th edition, Edited by W. E. Nelson. 12–16. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 1996.Google Scholar
  25. Gold, F., M. H. Blond, and C. Herve´. “Pratiques Franc¸ aises Actuelles de L'arrê t The´ rapeutique en Pe´ riode Ne´ onatale. “Annales de Pe´diatrie 43(1996).Google Scholar
  26. Gold, F., and J. Laugier. “La De´ cision d'arrê t The´ rapeutique en Re´ animation Ne´ onatale. Prise en Compte et Prise en Charge Initiale du Handicap. “Archives Franc¸ aises de Pe´diatrie 49(1992): 5–7.Google Scholar
  27. Goold, S. D., B. Williams, and R. M. Arnold. “Conflicts Regarding Decisions to Limit Treatment. “Journal of the American Medical Association 283(2000): 909–914.Google Scholar
  28. Guillemin, J. H., and L. L. Holmstrom. Mixed Blessings: Intensive Care for Newborns. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  29. Hack, M., and G. H. Taylor “Perinatal Injury in Preterm Infants and Later Neurobehavioral Function. “Journal of the American Medical Association 2843(2000): 1939–1947.Google Scholar
  30. Hassenteufel, P. Les me´decins face à l'Etat. Paris: F. N. S. P., 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Heimer, C. A., and L. R. Staffen. For the Sake of Children: The Social Organization of Responsibility in the Hospital and in the Home. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, E. C. Men and Their Work. Glencoe: Free Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  33. Humes, Edward. Baby ER. New York: Simon and Schuster Trade, 2000.Google Scholar
  34. Jenks, C. “The Postmodern Child. ”In Children in Families: Research and Policy. Edited by J. Brannen and M. O'Brien. 13–25. London: Falmer Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  35. Lantos, J. D., W. L. Meadow, S. H. Miles, E. Ekwo, J. Paton, J. R. Hageman, and M. Siegler. “Providing and Forgoing Resuscitative Therapy for Babies of Very Low Birth Weight. “Journal of Clinical Ethics 3(1992): 283–287.Google Scholar
  36. Lantos, J. D. The Lazarus Case: Life and Death Issues in Neonatal Intensive Care. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2001. a]Life Magazine. “Born Too Soon: The High Tech, High Risk Drama of Keeping the Tiniest Babies Alive. “May (2000).Google Scholar
  37. Levin, B. W. “International Perspectives on Treatment Choice in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. “Social Science and Medicine 30, no. 8(1990): 901–912.Google Scholar
  38. Levin, B. W. “The Cultural Context of Decision Making for Catastrophically Ill Newborns: The Case of Baby Jane Doe. ”In Childbirth in America: Anthropological Perspectives. Edited by K. Michaelson. 178–193. South Hadley: Bergind Garvey Publishers Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
  39. Lupton, D., and J. Fenwick. “They've Forgotten the Mum: Constructing and Practicing Motherhood in Special Care Nurseries. “Social Science and Medicine 53 (2001): 1011–1021.Google Scholar
  40. McHaffie, H., I. A. Laing, M. Parker, and J. McMillan. “Deciding for Imperilled Newborns: Medical Authority or Parental Autonomy?” Journal of Clinical Ethics 27 (2001): 33–38.Google Scholar
  41. Meadow, W., T. Reimshisel, and J. D. Lantos. “Birth Weight-Specific Mortality for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Vanishes by Four Days of Life: Epidemiology and Ethics in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. “Pediatrics 97, no. 5(1996): 636–643.Google Scholar
  42. Ness, D. E., and J. Ende. “Denial in the Medical Interview: Recognition and Management. “Journal of the American Medical Association 272(1994): 1777–1781.Google Scholar
  43. Orfali, K. “L'hô pital ou la Critique de la Raison Instrumentale. “The` se de doctorat, EHESS, 1997.Google Scholar
  44. Orfali, K. “The French Paradoxes. ”In The Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology. Edited by W. Cockerham. 263–286. London: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
  45. Orfali, K. “Etude de cas: Une Comparaison sur l'expe´ rience et le Rô le de la Famille Dans la De´ cision Me´ dicale en Re´ animation Ne´ onatale” aux USA et en France, Rapport MIRE 2001: 225.Google Scholar
  46. Orfali, K. “L'inge´ rence Profane dans la De´ cision Me´ dicale: le Malade, la Famille et l'e´ thique Clinique” Revue franc¸ aise des Affaires socials, 3(2002) 103–124.Google Scholar
  47. Orfali, K. “Parental Role and Medical Decision Making: Fact or Fiction? A Comparative Study of French and American Practices in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. “Social Science and Medicine 58(2004): 2009–2022.Google Scholar
  48. Pinch, W. J., and M. L. Spielman. “Parental Voices in the Sea of Neonatal Ethical Dilemmas. “Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 12(1989): 423–435.Google Scholar
  49. Poets, F. C., and B. Sens. “Changes in Intubation Rates and Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Population Based Study. “Pediatrics 98(1996): 24–27.Google Scholar
  50. Richardson, D. Women, Mothering and Childrearing. Basingstoke, London: Macmillan, 1993.Google Scholar
  51. Saigal, S., B. Stoskopf, D. Feeny, W. Furlong, E. Burrows, P. Rosenbaum, and L. Hoult. “Differences in Preferences for Neonatal Outcomes Among Health Care Professionals, Parents and Adolesecents. “The Journal of the American Medical Association 281(1999): 1991–1997.Google Scholar
  52. Schneider, C. E. The Practice of Autonomy, Patients, Doctors and Medical Decision. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  53. Shaw, J. C. L. “Parenteral Nutrition in the Management of Sick Low Birth Weight Infants. “Pediatric Clinics of North America 20(1973): 333–358.Google Scholar
  54. Shelp, E. E. Born To Die? Deciding the Fate of Critically Ill Newborns. New York: The Free Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  55. Sowards, K. A. “Interfacing Realities: Medical Work in the Intensive Care Nursery”. Paper presented at the American Sociological Organization, 1998.Google Scholar
  56. Sprung, C. L., and L. A. Eidelman. “Worldwide Similarities and Differences in the Forgoing of Life Sustaining Treatments. “Intensive Care Medicine 22(1996): 1003–1005.Google Scholar
  57. Strauss, A., S. Fagerhaugh, B. Suczek, and C. Wiener. The Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985. The Journal Of Clinical Ethics. Special Issue 12 (2001).Google Scholar
  58. Vandvik, I. H., and R. Forde. “Ethical Issues in Parental Decision Making. An Interview Study of Mothers of Children with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. “Acta Paediatrica 89(2000): 1129–1133.Google Scholar
  59. Vincent, J. L. “Forgoing Life Support in Western European Intensive Care Units: The Results of an Ethical Questionnaire. “Critical Care Medicine 27(1999): 1626–1633.Google Scholar
  60. Wall, S. N., and J. C. Partridge. “Death in the Intensive CareNursery: Physician Practice of Withdrawing and Withholding Life Support. “Pediatrics 99(1997): 64–70.Google Scholar
  61. Wolpe P. R. “The Triumph of Autonomy in American Bioethics: A Sociological View. ”In Bioethics and Society: Constructing the Ethical Enterprise. Edited by Raymond DeVries and Janardan Subedi. 38–59. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1998.Google Scholar
  62. Zussman, R. Intensive Care. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina Orfali
    • 1
  • Elisa Gordon
    • 2
  1. 1.MacLean Center for Clinical Medical EthicsThe University of ChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Stritch School of Medicine Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics and Health PolicyLoyola University of ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations