Can Homo erectus put an end to Chomsky’s mechanistic metaphysics?
- 86 Downloads
This should be a watershed book as it effectively demolishes the unwarranted assumptions that support the work of the major linguist of our times, Noam Chomsky. Instead of regarding language as predominantly computation and only secondarily as communication, as Chomsky insists, Daniel Everett offers convincing evidence that language’s main function is to communicate shared meanings within a cultural community, which allows for social learning and cultural creativity.
To demonstrate this, Everett attempts to trace the origin of symbol use, which he sees as the foundation of human language, and he finds it in the distant prehistoric past among the far-travelled species we designate as Homo erectus. In linguistic terminology, Everett defends the constitutive view of language over the designative, preferred by cognitive scientists. After years of refusing to discuss the origin of language, Chomsky in 2002 agreed with the metaphysical speculation that it must have begun as a lucky neural...
- Cassirer, E. 1944. An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Cassirer, E. 1953/1923. The philosophy of symbolic forms, vol 1: Language (trans. R. Manheim). Yale University Press. Original in German, 1923.Google Scholar
- Deacon, T.W. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. NY: Norton.Google Scholar
- de S. Paulo, F. 2009. “Ele virou um charlatão”, diz Chomsky. Cienza. São Paulo, domingo, 01 de fevereiro de 2009. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/ciencia/fe0102200904.htm.
- Everett, D.L. 2012. Language: The cultural tool. NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Everett, D.L. 2017. Dark matter of the mind: The culturally articulated unconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar