Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 99–105 | Cite as

How not to write an introduction to relativism

Bernd Irlenborn: Relativismus. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016, 152pp, $35.00 PB
  • Markus Seidel
Review Essay
  • 137 Downloads

For some years now, De Gruyter has edited the series Grundthemen Philosophie, Basic Issues in Philosophy, which provides the German-speaking philosophical community with truly wonderful introductions to the most widely debated philosophical topics. The books in this series are usually written by those German-speaking philosophers who, without any doubt, are experts in the field they are writing about, and the books—as I can tell by experience—work great in seminars. Given these facts I was quite enthusiastic when I was contacted and asked by Metascience to write a review on the volume Relativismus(Relativism) written by Bernd Irlenborn, a theologian based at the University of Paderborn. Unfortunately, after reading the volume and using it as required reading in one of my seminars I was deeply disappointed: the book is unsuitable as an introduction to the issue of relativism and contains so many basic flaws that I have to wonder whether it went through a serious peer-review process....

References

  1. Baghramian, Maria. 2004. Relativism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Carter, Adam. 2016. Epistemology and relativism. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/epis-rel/. Accessed 18 August 2017.
  3. Seidel, Markus. 2014. Epistemic relativism. A constructive critique. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations