Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 355–362 | Cite as

Between complexity and harmony: Peter Harrison on science and religion

Peter Harrison: The territories of science and religion. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2015, xiii+300pp, $30 Cloth
  • Yiftach Fehige
Symposium

Among the most intriguing interdisciplinary endeavours today is the academic investigation into the intricacies of the relationship between science and religion. Dixon (2008, 13–17) was the first to call this collaborative enterprise a field in its own right, and this rightly so, given the remarkable developments in the scholarly discussion about the relationship between science and religion (Fehige 2016b, 1–29). For example, ethnographic studies provide reasons to doubt the narrative of a victorious secularism in the scientific laboratory (Thomas 2016). Furthermore, the biggest interest group of the once deeply anti-theological and overtly science-oriented school of analytic philosophy is the Society of Christian Philosophers (Schellenberg 2009). Moreover, among political thinkers the awareness is growing that a liberal state deprives itself of potential sources of normativity if it favours science over religion in the public sphere by admitting only arguments that satisfy the...

References

  1. Brooke, John H. 1991. Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brooke, John H. 2014. Living with theology and science: From past to present. Theology and Science 12: 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixon, Thomas. 2008. Science and religion: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fehige, Yiftach. 2016a. Dialogue? Not. Quite. Yet: The Second Vatican Council on Judaism—and Modern Science. Science et Esprit 68: 275–285.Google Scholar
  5. Fehige, Yiftach. 2016b. Science and religion: East and west. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, Michael. 2002. Kant, Kuhn, and the rationality of science. Philosophy of Science 69: 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Habermas, Juergen. 2008. Religion in the public sphere: Cognitive presuppositions for the ‘public use of reason’ by religious and secular citizens. In Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays, ed. Juergen Habermas, 114–147. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Harrison, Peter. 1998. The Bible, Protestantism, and the rise of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison, Peter. 2007. The fall of men and the foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrison, Peter. 2010. The cambridge companion to science and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrison. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kitcher, Philip. 2007. Living with Darwin: Evolution, design, and the future of faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nagel, Thomas. 2012. Mind and cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Numbers, Ronald L. 2010. Simplifying complexity: Patterns in the history of science and religion. In Science and religion: New perspectives on science and religion, ed. Thomas Dixon, et al., 263–288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plantinga, Alvin. 2008. Where the conflict really lies: Science, religion, and naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Putnam, Hilary. 1987. The many faces of realism. Open Court: LaSalle.Google Scholar
  17. Schellenberg, John L. 2009. Philosophy of religion: A state of the subject report. Toronto Journal of Theology 25: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scruton, Roger. 2014. The soul of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swinburne, Richard. 2010. Is there a God?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Revised Edition).Google Scholar
  20. Thomas, Renny. 2016. Being religious, being scientific: Science, religion and atheism in contemporary India. In Science and religion: East and west, ed. Yiftach Fehige, 140–157. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and TechnologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations