Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 573–576 | Cite as

The self-fashioning of French Newtonianism

J. B. Shank: The Newton Wars and the beginning of the French Enlightenment. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2008, xv+571pp, $55.00 HB
  • Charles T. Wolfe
  • David Gilad
Book Review
  • 73 Downloads

J. B. Shank has written a major cultural history of Newtonianism in the French Enlightenment—or rather a study of how Newtonianism was constructed to serve the purposes of the “self-fashioning” of various key figures in the French Enlightenment. As straight history of ideas, it can be read as providing a French counterpart to works such as John Gascoigne’s masterful (1989) study of science and religion at Cambridge, or as a more detailed, more culturally and rhetorically sophisticated book-length extension of analyses such as Robert Schofield’s “taxonomy of eighteenth-century Newtonianisms” (Schofield 1978). But Shank is also interested in a different approach, a different form of analysis, which in fact challenges “the classic narrative produced by the Enlightenment philosophes” (21). He uses lots of language that harks back to the heyday of theory in the humanities—the book is “a critical genealogy of beginnings,” a “postmodern,” “post-Enlightenment” history of an event—but in fact...

References

  1. Brunet, Pierre. 1931. L’introduction des théories de Newton en France avant 1738 (reprint). Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Gascoigne, John. 1989. Cambridge in the age of the Enlightenment: Science, religion and politics from the Restoration to the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guédon, Jean-Claude. 1979. Chimie et matérialisme. La stratégie anti-newtonienne de Diderot. Dix-huitième siècle 11: 185–200.Google Scholar
  4. Schofield, R.E. 1978. An evolutionary taxonomy of eighteenth-century Newtonianisms. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 7: 175–192.Google Scholar
  5. Voltaire, F.M.A. 1877–1882. Œuvres complètes, ed. L. Moland, vol. 35, 54. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations