Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 3–27 | Cite as

A new perspective on objectivity and conventionalism

Talal A. Debs, Michael L. G. Redhead: Objectivity, invariance and convention: symmetry in physical science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007, pp. ix + 194. £24.95, €34.00, US$39.35
  • Antigone M. Nounou
  • Mauro Dorato
  • Sebastian Lutz
  • Stephan Hartmann
  • Talal A. Debs
  • Michael L. G. Redhead
Book Symposium

Antigone M. Nounou

The main theme in Debs’ and Redhead’s book revolves around the question ‘How do symmetries displayed by different media relate to the notion of objective scientific representation?’ In a few words, their answer could be summarized as follows. Invariantism, the position stating that invariance under symmetry transformations is both necessary and sufficient for objectivity, is unattainable. Yet, in cases where only spatiotemporal symmetries are involved, symmetry transformations may be interpreted as changes of perspective. In such cases, invariance becomes synonymous with multi-subjective agreement and, consequently, it can provide necessary and sufficient conditions for objectivity. On the other hand, since invariance is associated with formal ambiguity and conventional choice, it turns out that invariance has to do with convention as much as it does with objectivity.

I am very sympathetic to the authors’ view. In fact, I am impressed by both the modesty with which...

References

  1. Bueno, O. 1997. Empirical adequacy: A partial structures approach. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 28: 585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Candlish, S., and G. Wrisley. 2007. Private language. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Zalta, E.N. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2007/entries/private-language/.
  3. Dorato, M., and L. Felline. 2010. Structural explanations in Minkowski spacetime: Which accounts of models? In Space, time, and spacetime—physical and philosophical implications of Minkowski's unification of space and time, ed. V. Petkov. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Janis, A.I. 1983. Simultaneity and conventionality. In Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis, ed. R.S. Cohen, and L. Laudan, 101–110. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  5. Redhead, M.L.G. 1993. The conventionality of simultaneity. In Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds: essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grunbaum, ed. J. Earman, A.I. Janis, G.J. Massey, and N. Rescher, 103–128. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  6. Redhead, M.L.G. 2001. The intelligibility of the universe. In Philosophy at the new millennium, ed. A. O’Hear, 73–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antigone M. Nounou
    • 1
  • Mauro Dorato
    • 2
  • Sebastian Lutz
    • 3
  • Stephan Hartmann
    • 4
  • Talal A. Debs
    • 5
  • Michael L. G. Redhead
    • 5
  1. 1.National Hellenic Research FoundationAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Rome 3RomeItaly
  3. 3.Theoretical Philosophy UnitUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Tilburg Center for Logic and Philosophy of ScienceTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, Lakatos BuildingLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations